Sir Scarfalot

Having fought Sawh a good 3 times so far, I've found that starting off with taking superiorities and blockading then tossing nukes is an alright way of doing appreciable damage to a turret. Superiorities to prevent them from double-buying and suiciding tanks, blockade for obvious benefits, and nuking in order to tear down improvements will *eventually* force them to rebuild infra to maintain turreting. Meanwhile, nukes are so slow to deal resistance damage that I can easily use naval or ground battles to beige if I'm ever in danger of actually getting beiged myself. I should probably be using missiles to eliminate their manufacturing instead of the indiscriminate damage from a nuke, but I don't have the guiding satellite project yet so I'm going for the more efficient improvement destruction.

Congrats ~

Noot noot

Gib dosh. Nao.

I agree, nuke turreting is fine. And I'm saying this as someone that's been on both sides of the issue. Counter-nuking and raid counters are good ways to counterplay against turrets, while not being so powerful as to invalidate a playstyle that is vitally important for the long-term health of the game. Without the possibility of turreting, there's no incentive for the winners of wars to stop holding down their rivals. That leaves open the possibility of IQ-style shenanigans, and I shouldn't need to elaborate on why we need to avoid that.

wat

You didn't? Well, now you know, because that's exactly where they are fought.

Log drop~ Log drop~ gib us the log drop~ For reals, great to see some drama, there wasn't any for way too long

For reference to new friends, there was once a hilarious glitch that put everyone in Rose for some reason. It was quite a while ago though

Yeah, spy deaths are way out of proportion to their build speed, that's needed an adjustment for a long time.

Ah, you have a point about the decomming thing. I've never heard of an alliance caring about the maintenance cost of units though.

Sigh.

Well, usually you want to have as much military as you can get, so there's no particular point in buying less than you can. If you want less, just build less military improvements and fill the unused infra slots with economic improvements.

The credit option is weak because this game is not supposed to be pay-to-win. I for one like games that make sure the deep pockets don't have a competitive advantage over regular people.

Welcome back~

I remember we did this before, fun times~

Peace? Booooo! Limited nuke use? Double booooooooo! Newbies should be raiding, not farming, that’s just a fact. 😛

A what?

Like I say on my nation description: beige is no defeat

Ah, the good old times of being a raider…. I still remember back when fortify was a thing and one really could wage a one-nation war against literally anyone and win, guaranteed. Enjoy your wars and stay low, friend ~

Boo. BOOOOOOOOOO. Just because y'all can't raid safely anymore doesn't mean peace should happen, show some backbone lol

Learn patience dude, every war ends. Even NPOLT ended, despite IQ’s efforts to the contrary. Also being ‘destroyed’ is hardly a problem, don’t be afraid of it.

War war war

#freeLysander~ no wait I’m on the other side #jailLysander there we go 😅

So, Idk if this has been asked before, but what do you think should happen when an NAP and an MDP come into conflict? Personally I don’t consider honoring an MDP to be ‘aggression’ and therefore war should happen, but I’d like community input