Tuxedo

I am no MA guru and it was just a shower thought. "planes > ships > grounds " - This is still going to be hard to counter. the MAP to RES ratio still favours the aggressor.

Hmm. Maybe there be a new tactic to zero ships then planes?

@SketchyI disagree on your first point. I think the current MAP cost will make the wars more dynamic. If increase it will minimize the power of a counter offensive. We wanted to make wars more interesting here the answer! The way to counter this is having Naval. Let's say we increase the MAPs to 6. Scenario beginning of a blitz: Nation A has 12 MAPs, Nation B has has AS over Nation A, Nation A has more boats than Nation B, but the same amount of ground force as nation B. Nation A can do a naval and remove the AS. Cost 6 MAPs, 6 MAPs left. This allows Nation A to do only 2 ground attacks, when they have no advantage over Nation B on ground attacks. If we leave it at 4 this would allow nation A to try and do a third attack after TC. It be interesting to see counterattacks especially with double buys. There is one change I would make: You shouldn't be able to blockade if you remove GC or AS. Also in the Naval Attacks make it default to Target Ships, like it is with airstrike.

It's more like 1.144 billion

I drink everyday to make me forget my time in HS.

This is a win for Rose.

That's hysterical. What happens if they just remove Camelot from the list and just continue the vote after the war. I mean this is giving cash to arrgh.

How hard is it to add up votes.

Arrgh not late, they just keeping us in suspense!

Go here and create a ticket: https://discord.com/channels/216800987002699787/670462900917370908

I am still relative new to the game so this may have been answered before but why don't we use city count instead of instead of score for up declare and down declare limits?

Give him a chance.

Hello Rose

There will be plenty of time to sleep when you're dead

You slept for 48 hours, must have been a late night.