Arthur Wellington

What I dont get is this: IF coal. A says: 'we surrender', coal. B presents terms. IF coal. A then thinks: 'these terms are bonkers' then they can keep fighting. Why not try this? If the terms are bonkers, show them in the OWF and keep the moral high ground, if they are okay, then peace.

Have fun!

How about being able to hit planes with a new unit: The USS Enterprise! Map cost: 14 points. Dmg: 150% of total infra in target nation for 4/3 of its cities Bonus effect: the nation can never again ask for tanks with anti air

https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=180693 Offensive nation name

Lamenting CB's is a nice pass time, it however doesnt change much to the position orbis now is in. Why not formulate how to go on from here after stating once: 'hey! We didnt like that CB one bit!'. After that, consider what is best to do from this moment on? If the answer: lament some more, have fun!

Its a reaction to many summons to leave BK. And I believe TKR sucks?

Whats hidden about those costs?

Duke Arthur https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=174213

Dont mind a bit of offensive witty stuff but this is taking rping a bit far. https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=160467 *deleted the actual message

Thanks!

just joined the Black Knights and so should you!

Hi folks, Just joined, building up my new nation, reading up on current events like the world war. Hope to see you guys around!

Goodbye Stetonic, you've been an amazing MoD for us!

Yay TheNG, onwards for DEIC!

The morals of the western countries, so very narrowly and ignorant brought down to the us, uk and france allow you Ibrahim to talk right the wrongs of daesh. Daesh would not allow the same. In this insanely limited thought that do not deserve the name discussion, that means 'the west' is morally more right. Your historical arguments are flawed, one cannot use history to compare current events, not as a negative nor as a positive argument. One can use history to explain current events. For example how daesh is a reaction to the downfall of the middleeast.

I dont agree with the statement. You are trying to compare two things that are not comparable. A statement could be muslim world versus islamic world or something. But both are way to diverse to use in any analytical thesis. I as a resident from a western country am not responsible for my governments acts. Nor is a normal resident from IS territory. Following this you could then try to compare IS to a (not all!) Western government. Still, to vague and too generic. Based on your posts in this topic you want statements on how western lives are more important then Muslim (middle eastern) lives. I would tell you: no! This is not an important question, its an open invitation to flaming and trolling. If you are concerned about this topic you should try to bridge the gap between cultures, try to raise awarness for muslim citizens or something like that. Lives in the Middle East wont improve with more estrangement..

Atheisme argues against religion because of the negative effects of the tendency of theists to say: because my religion/god says so. Its stops trains of thought and often provides a null argument. The benefits of religion are not dependend on a god but on human communities. That being said: without religion no star wars

The biggest impact isnt found in the mid tier alliances, its found with the top 3 alliance leaders. Also, tC might have lost but leaders there started it all. Many of these names have to do with being heard. Its a list like americana having pop culture people in their congress talking nonsense so to assure the voters they are being heard through their popculture role models.

I for one had some fun but the missles and nukes hurt bad! Im happy with the peace and wish all parties involved the best!

this war has been great fun up to now, everybody had their laughs and its nearly (?!) over.. I think DEIC has payed the price for not winning in a very bad way, millions of cash had been lost in this war, many people left DEIC, our score has gone down the most of any alliance on Orbis and we are standing alone now.. Whatever you think of stetonic or Clarke is all silly.. I think demanding the same reps froM DEIC as from UPN is a sign of not being a nice group of winners. To be honest, I have no clue as to what the reps should be but lets not act that DEIC is the Empire and our enemies are the valliant Rebels.. anyways, have funsies with this thread!

Vivke

same problem for me

if the damned treaty was so important cody, and we were so very very close, why have I not once seen you post anything on our forums? why have you not once talked on the forums (here or at our place) prior to the military build up, why have you not posted something when the wars started happening a few days ago? Your cultivating this, even making your sig. about it... omfg.. and fyi, I think im the only Dutch guy in DEIC.. ;-)

CAPSLOCK IS THE TRUTH! because it suited both parties back then perhaps? besides, its not like 78 nations declared war on SK.. quit being a baby, accept the pixel dust and move on ffs..

as a relative new member to DEIC this seems total BS to me. What happend back then has nothing to with this current war. Re-read the DoW and stop making the attacks on SK seem like our complete roll on them.. This is the first war DEIC is in for the last 2 months (since I joined), many other alliances have been waging war while DEIC has kept peace and kept out of bullshit for a long time. Now ofcourse its great fun to root for the underdog (smaller alliances) but its just that, rooting default for the underdog. Spinning small events into major game changes are complete cluster!@#$s by an entire alliance (77 other people ffs) is just politics been played out and an easy point to score. Wage the freakin war and let the outcome speak for itself.