Ogaden

I actually view nationalism as a disease and excuse giant corporations use to arbitrage labor prices and state regulations against tariffs. We live in a giant worldwide Apartheid South Africa, with manufacturing bantustans of cheap labor on one side of the planet, and gated community first world terrified of the world outside the gates on the other side. All nations should be abolished and all states dissolved. There should be one law and one government, global international socialism.

You make this claim but there's nothing supporting it, you do only care about people getting killed or deported or oppressed when they're white and christian. In every other instance you have explained in detail how you believe that oppression, deaths and deportations are not just ok but good, because apparently that's the only way to ensure white and christian lives are saved. I mean you have the first paragraph here claiming you think minorities (important point here, white and christian minorities) shouldn't be deported in ALL circumstances. If they're white and christian they should be protected at all cost for instance. Then in your second paragraph you say how you need to ethnically homogenize your country. If that's the case then why on earth are you critical of Mugabe, who's agenda is literally to create a Shona ethnic nation state and kick out all the Zulus and white people? If ethnic homogeneity is the goal of a stable nation state, where is your Mugabe love? He was doing this before it was cool

Ironically South Africa and Zimbabwe are being criticized for essentially following an ethnic nationalist agenda with a special hatred for minorities and immigrants. You just don't like it because the minorities and immigrants are white. Trump isn't the antithesis of Mugabe, Trump IS Mugabe. The lesson to be learned from Zimbabwe and South Africa is that a tiny minority ruling over a majority where the majority are given no rights or any slice of the economic pie is unsustainable and dangerous, and also that ethnic nationalist politics inevitably leads to violence. I don't agree with Mugabe and the South Africans looking to emulate him, I don't think they should kill people, but at the same time I understand how they got like that, the same way how I understand why rural angry hillbillies in Trump country are also stockpiling guns and talking about a final solution to the darkie problem. If you blame your problems on a minority and stoke populist politics where everything is the fault of "Group X" then this is what happens, in every country, in every time in history. You can ironically see how this is bad in South Africa and Zimbabwe, but support these policies in your own country. I wonder why, what's the subtle difference?

Whenever it's the !@#$ who's fricked everyone for decades, centuries or even millennia finally gets their comeuppance the whining always starts, what did we ever do to deserve this? Someone compiles list as long as your arm, oh well that's all in the past! Meanwhile someone tries to make a mosque or some shit in midtown Manhattan and "it's all in the past" suddenly goes out the window and the same people whining about white genocide and "ancient history" start bringing up the Ummayads or some shit with "Victory Mosques". I too would love to live in a world of tolerance where ancient grudges aren't brought up when it's convenient, but we don't live in that world. We live in a shitty world full of shitty people who enjoy the suffering of others, and the only discrimination they don't like is when it's against them. So no, frick white colonial settlers, they can go frick themselves. They made this bed now they can sleep in it.

Justice would be white south Africans being placed under apartheid for 60 years. They're getting off easy

We're living in the zone dude, people have lowered expectations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_traumatic_encephalopathy

Buorhann is the hero Orbis needs, but not the hero Orbis deserves

I like this guy, I think he has the right stuff to be leader of TKR

I don't see the irony, that's a different war?

I don't really feel like playing anymore to be honest, this will wipe out the last vestiges of fun this game had. Maybe I'll take a month off and see how things are in April

Here are some meaningful things you could add for a nation losing a war: Plant Anti-Personnel Mines: Plant mines between your army and an opposing army, enemy soldiers take 15% casualties regardless of odds, costs 4 action points, can be done as many times as you like for additional damage to attacking forces, but one opposing ground attack clears your minefield. Costs 10 munitions per city. Plant Anti-Tank Mines: Plant mines between your army and an opposing army, enemy tanks take 10% casualties regardless of odds, costs 4 action points, can be done as many times as you like for additional damage to attacking forces, but one opposing ground attack clears your minefield. Costs 10 munitions per city. Deploy Air Defences: Deploy ground to air missile systems and anti-air guns, attacking enemy aircraft take 10% casualties regardless of odds, can be done as many times as you like for additional damage to attacking airplanes, but one opposing air attack clears your defences. Costs 10 munitions, 10 aluminum and 10 gas per city. Lay Sea Defences: Your mine laying ships lay sea mines around strategic sea lanes and harbours and anti-ship missiles are deployed to coastal areas. Enemy attacking ships suffer 10% casualties, can be done as many times as you like for additional damage to attacking forces, but one opposing naval attack clears your mines and defences. Costs 10 munitions, 10 aluminum and 10 gas per city.

Boyce is a victim of his own success, mounds of gold and nowhere to stash it

Why would we complain, Arrgh gets hit while asleep more than anyone else on the planet

Lordship is a fine gentleman

Or hey, how about meaningful actions someone can take if they can't get a victory of any kind other than fortify?

You didn't win papers please, we never surrendered. We never will either, you will inevitably lose this conflict as well.

I think Partisan starts wars so he can make Taylor Swift videos

Ironically there are fewer wars against tkr than usual. Some war this is

Azaghul join Arrgh

Raiding inactive nations is just common sense, no hostility there really

Well you guys stopped being Enemies of Arrgh, hell I think after that we ended up doing several billion in treasure sales

I always preferred adding people to my Enemies of Arrgh list, so you have time to get around to everybody

Haha are they going back to that well? DYNAMISM! I can picture the discussions: "Hmm well NPO are the only alliance that really poses a meaningful threat to us long term" "Alliance with NPO it is!"