No. There is a reason why you can only be in one continent at a time
Could be cool but kinda pointless
No. This game is politics and WAR you can't just pay money to not be declared on. We already got enough pixel huggers, we don't need more.
Ehh could be useful but it's not really needed. People already have naps as RP and for other reasons.
Can't say much on this. Would be a nice QoL but I think having unlimited polygons would probably effect the server in some wa that's why it's that way. Idk coding do this is just speculation.
Nice QoL. But it only takes a minute to go in then change it yourself after creating onem.
Nothing to say here since I oppose transcontinental nations.
Could be funny for the first few days when big members aa try to write Smth funny on others trade bloc. but it'll probably get annoying quickly.
No. This would completely ruin the balance of the game. Imagine people making projects which cost next to nothing and give you a 50% discount on cities.
I think the commerce improvements and systems are good as the way they are. We don't need to change them if they work.
Tell me you are below 16 cities without telling me you're below 16 cities. This is stupid broken.
Same thing as the last one. Stupid broken.
Tell me you know nothing about alliance wars without telling me you know nothing about alliance wars. This project would be a must buy and it would make soldiers too op and tanks kinda obsolete, since you only get 15% bonus for tanks but you more than triple soldiers.
This could be a good idea if implemented right.
Uhm, you know that actual people are trading resources right? This would make no sense! People who want to sell their resources would have to buy them without their control!