Clarke

Know what you are. Fragile masculinity? You have no masculinity.

Giving out to many alliances that have seen defeat more often than not and that they're ruining the game is illogical.

How many wars has IQ won?

I doubt anyone cared about it which is why most probably voted abstain.

Heavy metal

Its good to be into memes however don't go full retard.

We are and we aren't, he's trying to make it about her being a woman and focusing on just that aspect.

Consent is an odd word to use for this situation. I'm not disagreeing with you but you have it from slightly the wrong angle. The same people who support "consent" and "women doing whatever they want with their bodies" are the ones who harassed her to death. She broke the "rules" for avoiding interaction with a minority group, sex is an interaction. Her "consent" and control over her body at that point was irrelevant to them.

They shouldn't obviously and its not just refusing to have sex with a person in a minority group, if you do anything to avoid interaction with a minority group you will be harassed. That is the fact..

She was harassed because the person she declined to have sex with was in a minority group.

A bit trivial seeing how she had sex with blacks and they have high STD levels.

This is primarily about European countries and other western countries, not solely the US. Also Trump shouldn't have needed the voting power of white women, the fact it is required to win is also the fault of white women.

Sounds like you want voting to be on easy mode...

I wasn't going to spend a huge amount of time on something that might not be allowed. Yes that alone is enough reason not to be making decisions. There is a darker side to it as well where they're subconsciously trying to test the males in society by creating conflict.

They're taking out as much as they're putting into the economy today because of the welfare state which they primarily helped build, they may not if they don't have kids but that's another problem. Rather than been dependent on their man, today they're dependent on the government while also using the man for extra resources. A lot of women aren't very good workers either. In the past a family could survive on a single income, dual income is necessary today as the value of workers is less because of women entering the workforce. Children are of the utmost importance and women aren't having them in sufficient numbers so they need to be removed from the work force to give birth and take care of the kids.

Thanks and don't be worried about women fleeing these sorts of games, most have no interest in playing games like these. Free speech is definitely not a reason as the moderators here are quite strict on speech so women should feel comfortable here.

Not a very low opinion, from an evolutionary standpoint I have an idea of how they think subconsciously which may come across as a low opinion but its not. Stupid men is basically the same thing if you think about it. All men on the left and a lot of men on the right, the right might not be as bad but its still catering. Not every policy the left pushes is to benefit women directly but every policy is what women want which likely won't benefit men. I certainly agree it seems feeble minded from the outside even to me but then humans aren't beyond their biology as much as we think we're. We're now essentially killing our societies trying to fight against our nature hence the tanking birthrate.

Yes it was simplified greatly, most men who support those policies subconsciously/deliberately do it to try to win favor with women in hopes the women will breed/mate with them. Being the nice guy. Red pill won't work as its not in their interest, if you're giving all this free stuff to women they won't give it up willingly.

There's some interesting talk going on around the internet on various platforms about what is wrong with the western world and its decline. I only recently discovered people talking about the idea of removing women's right to vote and they make an interesting case. Do you think women's right to vote should be revoked?

1) WTF is this? I'll click on it to find out. (They don't read the small print, if they did they wouldn't click) 2) Gib Me Moniez 3) I'm at a lost 4) I'm too lazy to make my own stuff 5) ODN in P&W? I'll check them out

Attraction doesn't make one race better than another, people were ranking who they were more attracted to. You line up ten girls of the same race and you pick your favorite two, it doesn't mean you think the rest are inferior. They're just not your taste. Same principle. Obviously the Roz's thread was satire as well because we can't have 4 wives and there is no way in hell we ever will. He definitely wasn't promoting it, if anything it was satire aimed at a barbaric religion.

The problem with this is that this is the internet, not some college campus or workplace environment where you can label someone a racist and ruin them. People generally see through the nonsense that it is not racist. Anyone who thinks its racist has no clue and can't form a coherent argument as to why it is. They just say its racist and stop debate from happening, what one deems as racism is an opinion and with everyone wanting to be a victim then they deem everything is racist. Who I want to have sex with is not racism.

This "game" (in the post) uses men as objects to be coveted and possessed, which is not only wrong and demeaning to men, but also dangerous for our younger players (of whom there are many) who are developing their beliefs and understanding of how the world and interpersonal relations works. This post could be interpreted as against the rules from trolling (deliberately provocative posting with the aim of inciting an angry response) to the promotion of illegal activity (polygamy is illegal in the United States, where the game is based, as well as the majority of jurisdictions where players come from.)