SleepingNinja

So pinging me in your public news server was easier than just sending a DM my way? It would have been just as easy so that's pretty disingenuous at best. I have every reason to believe that you wished to publicly embarrass me. Secondly it was on topic of the conversation at hand within the given thread, perhaps a sub-topic of the actual topic at hand but it was in no way derailing towards the thread at hand. Given that I do have reason to believe that there was at least a bit of a personal stake in it. Given you & probably most of the users in DNN have no idea who I am and vice versa there's ample reason to believe you wished to pull me into a situation which would be uncomfortable for myself. Secondly, I brought this up because of posts like this By this point in the thread the only person working at RON that posted was Monti, and he didn't say anything worthy of making this comment, so please elaborate on why you've been taking these kinds of potshots at RON every other post you make when RON literally has nothing to do with any of the subject matter in at the very least that thread there. Unless for some reason your associating myself with RON since I was more or less the only one as you would say 'instigating' in that thread, so anyone in CTO = RON? Now I'm not saying you haven't tried in respects but your also guilty of what you've said about me, your content in this post added absolutely nothing in an alliance affairs thread that had nothing to do with RON and was completely off-topic. Which is odd since you'll ping me over when you think we're derailing a thread that wasn't really all that off topic then jump into another one and do exactly that? Do you see why I decided to engage now? Now that all being said I'll agree with you on a few points, firstly I absolutely despise news servers. But I'm also forced to participate if I wish to be an active member of the PnW community. Your also correct about not engaging in the first place and walking away as well but if I just did that then you wouldn't see anything wrong with your own behavior since nobody else will ever tell you otherwise. The real difference between us, your respected and known throughout the community, since I've joined I have always found myself or the alliance I'm in being shit on by the community at large.. The other difference being as we can see clearly in the screenshot posted by KindaEpic, my writing skills are simply not on the level of those of other alliance leaders or players of influence [Skill issue?] while on the other hand yours are. You are in a position to set the example while I am not. So it's disappointing seeing you flip-flop on this. I do apologize for the 'Clique' comment though, but the fact is your friends are more than happy to step in and defend you as evidenced here, and those screens KindaEpic dropped for us all to read, even though you clearly don't need it.

Luckily I had a reasonable explanation, but the intention was the point. 🤷‍♂️ Either way why not just post on the forums where the conversation itself was going on in the first place, what other reason would there be?

Screw it, fine I'll bite. How is this entirely RON's fault? Really please explain how your news server is any different than RON? I'm in both and the way I see it the same garbage goes on in both servers. And your hypocritical ass contributes to it just as much. Remember this post? Instead of continuing the discussion you went out of your way to ping me in DNN just so you could have your whole clique jump on me along with yourself instead of just continuing the public discussion in public. Give your head a shake hidude, how you can point the finger and not realize your also part of the problem IS THE EXACT PROBLEM WITH THIS GAME. Read that again, but slowly before you reply.🤷‍♂️ Edit : Just for clarities sake your damn right I'm also part of that issue, I simply matched the energy that's given out everywhere I look. It's a shame but the other option is to be a nameless player that never contributes at all, which might be the better choice frankly.

I dunno. I didn't really think that through to be honest. I'm prepared to eat the mass downvote, it's probably a bad idea. @Prefontaine yeah your right. Probably one of my worst ideas. please ignore my foolishness lol

Alternatively how would you guys feel about a 12 turn timer, IT's will work but no superiorities until after a full 12 turns has passed? Or perhaps 6 instead. Might be worth considering.

So starting a global at the start of July = not summer but starting a war at the end of August = summer. Okay then.🤔

PENIS

I am here to assure you that orange man still bad. Good day.❤️

This mostly but wanted to add that if the point of the new beige system is to allow nations time to rebuild military then we should at least give them a day for their alliance to have the opportunity to try and organize a counter-blitz. 6 days is necessary in that regard.

Nation links in question https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=448325 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=439983 Sorry about the confetti getting in the way. Also going to include war timelines showing similar log-in times for attacks https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=1401914 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=1401920

Thanks for taking the time to read my thread and I appreciate the response. I'd love to DM you and discuss this further however it seems I am not allowed to DM you nor add your account as a friend. Please feel free to DM me whenever you get a chance as I don't have restrictions on who can DM me. Have a good day friend.🙂

No. Fix the game first.

Not really my concern. My concern is with players who aren't as interested in the game that might answer a ping to declare following orders and forgets about the game for the next 3 days. I guess in a sense that proves the point but it doesn't seem right either to punish them for inactivity. Well in any of the current cases you posted that scenario doesn't exist so it wouldn't apply to the now anyways.

I was honestly just concerned to see if I was doing it but going by the last global I was in that's not the case for me. I know I ignored wars but looking back they were all defensive slots.

Is.. is it against the rules to fish for beige time? I could have sworn it wasn't. Not tryin to be troll I'm actually a bit confused on this atm. Edit : nvm, pablo's reply wasn't on my screen when i posted this.

that emoji seems to have left a misunderstanding. That was more of a "i don't !@#$in know" as it seems pretty pointless from where I'm standing too, that was simply the only logical reason I could think of if you would call it logical.

It's almost like Celestial might actually know this and are declaring attrition wars just to be annoying and spiteful. Kinda like how they're probably annoyed you "sided" with HW in the opening rounds.🤷‍♂️

Alex friend.. you are making a mountain out of a molehill and frankly there are much bigger issues right now that need your attention. Let the players worry about moderating actual slot filling and the like. If hollywood players thought there was an issue they'd make a game report.

Why did Alex hire a mod that doesn't understand how the rules work..? 🤔

Just gonna leave that there since apparently there's a bug that doesn't register air superiority? Also ha I've done 7 GA's in a row before, which costs 21 MAPs. 20 MAPs is rookie numbers in this racket!

dnn

TKR was used an an example because they were at the top, nothing more. Individual timers per nation as well as blockading should keep things from getting too out of control. I don't think the numbers I used are something that should be set in stone either as Monti pointed out we can adjust how much an alliance can hold on them in terms of balance as needed. Lets say for example these past 2 globals (yes yes, GW24 is not real, not big enough blah blah) of Hw vs Celestial and Clock vs BR as examples and assume each alliance was full up on their reserves. The HW-Celestial war would be going down way different for a few reasons ; 1st would be that Celestial could have saved their first round since they weren't running 5/5/5/3 however if this were actually a thing HW would also know that they could/would do it and than initiate blockades to prevent it. This would also have a slowing effect on the blitz since they'd have to allocate MAPs that would initially be used for GAs / Airstrikes into Naval's that would prevent reinforcements and fighting them at full military which would give Celestial more time to decide a course of action and members to login & rebuy. At the same time if they ignored blockading then Celestial would get free reign to re-up at their leisure. Now would this change the outcome of the HW-Celestial war? Maybe, maybe not. It'd be a hell of a lot more interesting to see. On the flip side if BR tried to do it against Clock in that war it simply wouldn't have worked out and it would turn into a waste of resources, that said I'm probably overlooking some fun new strategies that could have come with having the options. But it would have been wasteful for the most part for BR to try using it. Basically Tiering and numbers still matter. It's up to the individual alliances to decide if it's worth using them or not. These reserve forces are protected so nothing can actually destroy them, which the point being is it wouldn't really change anything from the now of turtling after the 1st round in a lost war. But in cases like this HW-Celestial war where Celestial actually outnumbers HW in some of the higher tiers it gives unique opportunities.

Yes that's sorta the idea by way of the nation builds needing the military improvements to receive soldiers and yeah, blockading + 5 day cooldowns on anyone that did receive reserve troops, even if it's only 1 soldier or ship. I'm sure we could also add in a required log-in like if someone is red or purple diamond they cannot receive troops until they log in even if they meet the improvements required. So nation X is inactive for 5 days but is running 5/5/5/3 however nation X's military on hand is only 0/2/5/0, because nation X has a red diamond nation X cannot receive reserves until he logs in and the diamond changes.👍

The nation in question can only receive the number of troops according to their improvements. So if they're running 0/2/5/0 the amount of soldiers an alliance can send will still be 0 until that nation switch's their build. Also as I mentioned if you blockade said nation they cannot receive any reinforcements & furthermore as I mentioned I was thinking there should be a 5 day cooldown for individual nations after being sent reinforcements.