Arthur James Posted October 3, 2016 Share Posted October 3, 2016 blame the jews again, sissyboy....I wonder if it is your feminist/princess education which poison the culture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted October 3, 2016 Share Posted October 3, 2016 An Australian citizen, in the Ecuadorian embassy, in the middle of London. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted October 3, 2016 Share Posted October 3, 2016 It may be sad but there are reasons why East Asian minorities do better than others. We should imprint the best possible spirit on the the people, the poor needing it most (who minorities often belong to). The opposite position that it was all magically the fault of the white man is just a cop out, the easy way out, and a cynical ploy to gain support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 I have noticed an inverse relationship to Nate Platinum's election forecast % and Roz's shitposting. Roz confirmed for Nate Platinum shill. -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. I bet Roz tried to figure out what the "BIG" announcement was...and it was NOTHING!!!! -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 When you win make them pay Donald. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Even the Clinton News Network has to admit that Pence won. Crooked Hillary's Kaine could not support her. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 (edited) Removed for Rule violations Approved by: Alex and Alice Edited October 7, 2016 by Alice Abernathy Rule Violations 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 Even the Clinton News Network has to admit that Pence won. Crooked Hillary's Kaine could not support her. Almost like an organization that tries to be unbiased huh? This will blow your mind when you figure it out. -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 New leaks are coming out so prepare yourselves folks, a sudden BLM riot is incoming no doubt as they strangely tend to when these events happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 New leaks are coming Better hope its a big one. Your Cuck is getting smashed. -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 Hillary Clinton has taken a lead in Arizona,by a margin of 44% to 42%. -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 Q3. If the 2016 presidential election were held today, who would you vote for…? Florida Likely Voters n= 661 Hillary Clinton, the Democrat 47% Donald Trump, the Republican 40% -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 http://archive.is/WdqNK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 How about adding substance to your posts? I see you fled the alt-right thread...again. I know its hard to defend your positions Roz. Maybe that should tell you something about your positions? -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozalia Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvrZlvIcqc0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guinevere Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvrZlvIcqc0 Not sure why this is a bad thing? Putin also is supportive of Donald Trump. Double Standard much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 In October of 1860, James Russell Lowell, the founding editor of The Atlantic, warned in these pages about the perishability of the great American democratic experiment if citizens (at the time, white, male citizens) were to cease taking seriously their franchise: In a society like ours, where every man may transmute his private thought into history and destiny by dropping it into the ballot-box, a peculiar responsibility rests upon the individual … For, though during its term of office the government be practically as independent of the popular will as that of Russia, yet every fourth year the people are called upon to pronounce upon the conduct of their affairs. Theoretically, at least, to give democracy any standing-ground for an argument with despotism or oligarchy, a majority of the men composing it should be statesmen and thinkers. One of the animating causes of this magazine at its founding, in 1857, was the abolition of slavery, and Lowell argued that the Republican Party, and the man who was its standard-bearer in 1860, represented the only reasonable pathway out of the existential crisis then facing the country. In his endorsement of Abraham Lincoln for president, Lowell wrote, on behalf of the magazine, “It is in a moral aversion to slavery as a great wrong that the chief strength of the Republican party lies.†He went on to declare that Abraham Lincoln “had experience enough in public affairs to make him a statesman, and not enough to make him a politician.†Perhaps because no subsequent candidate for the presidency was seen as Lincoln’s match, or perhaps because the stakes in ensuing elections were judged to be not quite so high as they were in 1860, it would be 104 years before The Atlantic would again make a presidential endorsement. In October of 1964, Edward Weeks, writing on behalf of the magazine, cited Lowell’s words before making an argument for the election of Lyndon B. Johnson. “We admire the President for the continuity with which he has maintained our foreign policy, a policy which became a worldwide responsibility at the time of the Marshall Plan,†the endorsement read. Johnson, The Atlantic believed, would bring “to the vexed problem of civil rights a power of conciliation which will prevent us from stumbling down the road taken by South Africa.†The Atlantic has endorsed only three presidential candidates in 159 years. Abraham Lincoln (1860) and Lyndon B. Johnson (1964) were the first two. (Alexander Gardner / Getty; ullstein bild / Getty) But The Atlantic’s endorsement of Johnson was focused less on his positive attributes than on the flaws of his opponent, Barry Goldwater, the junior senator from Arizona. Of Goldwater, Weeks wrote, “His proposal to let field commanders have their choice of the smaller nuclear weapons would rupture a fundamental belief that has existed from Abraham Lincoln to today: the belief that in times of crisis the civilian authority must have control over the military.†And the magazine noted that Goldwater’s “preference to let states like Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia enforce civil rights within their own borders has attracted the allegiance of Governor George Wallace, the Ku Klux Klan, and the John Birchers.†Goldwater’s limited capacity for prudence and reasonableness was what particularly worried The Atlantic. We think it unfortunate that Barry Goldwater takes criticism as a personal affront; we think it poisonous when his anger betrays him into denouncing what he calls the “radical†press by bracketing the New York Times, the Washington Post, and Izvestia. There speaks not the reason of the Southwest but the voice of Joseph McCarthy. We do not impugn Senator Goldwater’s honesty. We sincerely distrust his factionalism and his capacity for judgment. Today, our position is similar to the one in which The Atlantic’s editors found themselves in 1964. We are impressed by many of the qualities of the Democratic Party’s nominee for president, even as we are exasperated by others, but we are mainly concerned with the Republican Party’s nominee, Donald J. Trump, who might be the most ostentatiously unqualified major-party candidate in the 227-year history of the American presidency. These concerns compel us, for the third time since the magazine’s founding, to endorse a candidate for president. Hillary Rodham Clinton has more than earned, through her service to the country as first lady, as a senator from New York, and as secretary of state, the right to be taken seriously as a White House contender. She has flaws (some legitimately troubling, some exaggerated by her opponents), but she is among the most prepared candidates ever to seek the presidency. We are confident that she understands the role of the United States in the world; we have no doubt that she will apply herself assiduously to the problems confronting this country; and she has demonstrated an aptitude for analysis and hard work. Donald Trump, on the other hand, has no record of public service and no qualifications for public office. His affect is that of an infomercial huckster; he traffics in conspiracy theories and racist invective; he is appallingly sexist; he is erratic, secretive, and xenophobic; he expresses admiration for authoritarian rulers, and evinces authoritarian tendencies himself. He is easily goaded, a poor quality for someone seeking control of America’s nuclear arsenal. He is an enemy of fact-based discourse; he is ignorant of, and indifferent to, the Constitution; he appears not to read. This judgment is not limited to the editors of The Atlantic. A large number—in fact, a number unparalleled since Goldwater’s 1964 campaign—of prominent policy makers and officeholders from the candidate’s own party have publicly renounced him. Trump disqualified himself from public service long before he declared his presidential candidacy. In one of the more sordid episodes in modern American politics, Trump made himself the face of the so-called birther movement, which had as its immediate goal the demonization of the country’s first African American president. Trump’s larger goal, it seemed, was to stoke fear among white Americans of dark-skinned foreigners. He succeeded wildly in this; the fear he has aroused has brought him one step away from the presidency. Our endorsement of Clinton, and rejection of Trump, is not a blanket dismissal of the many Trump supporters who are motivated by legitimate anxieties about their future and their place in the American economy. But Trump has seized on these anxieties and inflamed and racialized them, without proposing realistic policies to address them. In its founding statement, The Atlantic promised that it would be “the organ of no party or clique,†and our interest here is not to advance the prospects of the Democratic Party, nor to damage those of the Republican Party. If Hillary Clinton were facing Mitt Romney, or John McCain, or George W. Bush, or, for that matter, any of the leading candidates Trump vanquished in the Republican primaries, we would not have contemplated making this endorsement. We believe in American democracy, in which individuals from various parties of different ideological stripes can advance their ideas and compete for the affection of voters. But Trump is not a man of ideas. He is a demagogue, a xenophobe, a sexist, a know-nothing, and a liar. He is spectacularly unfit for office, and voters—the statesmen and thinkers of the ballot box—should act in defense of American democracy and elect his opponent. -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts