Popular Post MonkeyDLegend Posted September 13, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted September 13, 2019 (edited) I was thinking about how you need to delete and repost the trades on market eachtime you want to change the amount & price. It would be nice if you could edit both of them in real time, instead of deleting the offer and reposting it. Something like this: Edited September 13, 2019 by MonkeyDLegend 6 17 Quote Former Manager t$ and Director of R&D Former Director of Finance, Security in e$ Founder of The Prate Syndicate(test server) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meh Imperfect Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 Agree. This is so so inconvenient....and annoying. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pasky Darkfire Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 It's small QoL improvements like this that are just as awesome as large scale ones. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyDLegend Posted September 14, 2019 Author Share Posted September 14, 2019 Agree Quote Former Manager t$ and Director of R&D Former Director of Finance, Security in e$ Founder of The Prate Syndicate(test server) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micchan Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 Also if you're blockaded the trade offer disappears and you have to make another one after the blockade, they should only be invisible and become active again after the blockade 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Elijah Mikaelson Posted September 15, 2019 Share Posted September 15, 2019 (edited) I personally think we need to revamp the whole trade system, Mainly due to the people who list the same 50,000 food like 10 times and there should also be a cost to placing it on the market say 5% so you would have to work that in to the cost as well, there's so many things that can be done. Once someone list 50,000 it is taken from their nation until a buyer is found, if no buyer is found within 168 hours they lose the 5% it would have cost them to try and sell it. so if you are listing 1m ad something crazy like 5000 ppu, that's 5 billion so 5% would be 250m this would also stop people from trying to hide resources on the market. This would first of all make people think more carefully about market trades and how they price them, it will also stop people listing the same 50,000 ten times just to try and be the lowest. Edited September 15, 2019 by Elijah Mikaelson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyDLegend Posted September 15, 2019 Author Share Posted September 15, 2019 12 hours ago, Micchan said: Also if you're blockaded the trade offer disappears and you have to make another one after the blockade, they should only be invisible and become active again after the blockade :100: 13 minutes ago, Elijah Mikaelson said: I personally think we need to revamp the whole trade system, Mainly due to the people who list the same 50,000 food like 10 times and there should also be a cost to placing it on the market say 5% so you would have to work that in to the cost as well, there's so many things that can be done. Once someone list 50,000 it is taken from their nation until a buyer is found, if no buyer is found within 168 hours they lose the 5% it would have cost them to try and sell it. so if you are listing 1m ad something crazy like 5000 ppu, that's 5 billion so 5% would be 250m this would also stop people from trying to hide resources on the market. This would first of all make people think more carefully about market trades and how they price them, it will also stop people listing the same 50,000 ten times just to try and be the lowest. What if they just delete the offer before 168h and then repost it ? Quote Former Manager t$ and Director of R&D Former Director of Finance, Security in e$ Founder of The Prate Syndicate(test server) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marlboro lalo Posted September 15, 2019 Share Posted September 15, 2019 Agreed. Sooo annoying to have to delete the trade and then go and create an offer again. Sometimes you also get that captcha in between so it's doubly annoying >,< 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Elijah Mikaelson Posted September 15, 2019 Share Posted September 15, 2019 7 minutes ago, MonkeyDLegend said: What if they just delete the offer before 168h and then repost it ? Well if they delete it they lose the 5%, everything but a sale will lose you the 5% even if someone tries to buy it and you do not have it on hand you will lose the 5% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyDLegend Posted September 15, 2019 Author Share Posted September 15, 2019 12 minutes ago, Elijah Mikaelson said: Well if they delete it they lose the 5%, everything but a sale will lose you the 5% even if someone tries to buy it and you do not have it on hand you will lose the 5% Thats kinda huge, also i'm not sure, we do need to lower the amounts but it can be done by other means than this one. 1 Quote Former Manager t$ and Director of R&D Former Director of Finance, Security in e$ Founder of The Prate Syndicate(test server) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Elijah Mikaelson Posted September 15, 2019 Share Posted September 15, 2019 5 minutes ago, MonkeyDLegend said: Thats kinda huge, also i'm not sure, we do need to lower the amounts but it can be done by other means than this one. Well when its free to post trades people do so willingly, most games i play it cost to place trades Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyDLegend Posted September 15, 2019 Author Share Posted September 15, 2019 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Elijah Mikaelson said: Well when its free to post trades people do so willingly, most games i play it cost to place trades I mean trasportation of goods has a cost, it's something that should be added but not 5% of it, that's too huge. Edited September 15, 2019 by MonkeyDLegend Quote Former Manager t$ and Director of R&D Former Director of Finance, Security in e$ Founder of The Prate Syndicate(test server) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Elijah Mikaelson Posted September 15, 2019 Share Posted September 15, 2019 39 minutes ago, MonkeyDLegend said: I mean trasportation of goods has a cost, it's something that should be added but not 5% of it, that's too huge. 5% was just a number, could be lower. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandystalin Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 Seems like it would drive down prices. Nobody would want to lose their 5% so everyone would undercut their oppo. I mean this happens now to a degree, hence the desire behind the original suggestion, but effectively fining players for being undercut can only increase it 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonkeyDLegend Posted September 17, 2019 Author Share Posted September 17, 2019 On 9/16/2019 at 7:10 AM, Mandystalin said: Seems like it would drive down prices. Nobody would want to lose their 5% so everyone would undercut their oppo. I mean this happens now to a degree, hence the desire behind the original suggestion, but effectively fining players for being undercut can only increase it Could just increase the % of the cost each time you edit/ undercut someone and cap it at 5%. Quote Former Manager t$ and Director of R&D Former Director of Finance, Security in e$ Founder of The Prate Syndicate(test server) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greene Posted September 21, 2019 Share Posted September 21, 2019 On 9/15/2019 at 6:32 AM, Elijah Mikaelson said: Well if they delete it they lose the 5%, everything but a sale will lose you the 5% even if someone tries to buy it and you do not have it on hand you will lose the 5% So as I understand it, your suggestion is to have [if trade is unsuccessful, charge 5%] right? If we're going for a full revamp, I'd love to also see something implemented where you could also lose an extra 10% to have the source be kept secret. So like no one knows who listed the trade, just that it's listed. And that 10% would come out time of trade creation, and be tacked on in addition to the 5% penalty for having a trade fail after n hours timer or being cancelled. Quote Formerly known as Grealind of Resvernas (28 October 2014-29 August 2017) and Greene of Japan (29 August 2017-28 Septmber 2017) 7th Caretaker of Duat, the Deity Thoth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Elijah Mikaelson Posted September 21, 2019 Share Posted September 21, 2019 17 minutes ago, Greene said: So as I understand it, your suggestion is to have [if trade is unsuccessful, charge 5%] right? If we're going for a full revamp, I'd love to also see something implemented where you could also lose an extra 10% to have the source be kept secret. So like no one knows who listed the trade, just that it's listed. And that 10% would come out time of trade creation, and be tacked on in addition to the 5% penalty for having a trade fail after n hours timer or being cancelled. that would be cool also Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.