Is there any way to destroy another player's projects?

[Baumgilad]

For example, his capacity to build missiles and nukes?

[Areton Chashul]

no

[Peacity Peace]

no

 

But the question remains: Why?

[Andrezj Kolarov]

But the question remains: Why?

Because it would be ridiculously overpowered, NP's are very expensive and they and cities can only be built once every 10 days (real time). It would be like if you could destroy cities.

[AiOS]

They should at least be rendered useless when a player (for example) has cities at only 10 infra with no power. How can it be logical that they can continue to build weapons (like nukes) and fight in a condition like that? (I've seen a ridiculous example of it recently.)

Edited May 27, 2016 by Tyro Leif

[Baumgilad]

I don't really see the logic in a player having a missile platform or nuclear weapons lab that can't be bombed.

[Sailor Jerry]

Since NPs are just really big improvements and most improvements need power in order to function, I'd think that in a situation where if half or more of a nation's cities are without power, then the NPs would also loose power and therefore be temporarily nonfunctioning. Once power is restored to the majority (51%+) of the cities, then the NPs would be restored back to fully operational. They don't have to be destroyed, just rendered temporarily unavailable ue to loss of power.

[Prefontaine]

You can argue for an ability to do some form of an attack, spy op, or having some form of combination of controls ( air, ground, blockade ) that would prevent or weaken the ability to get hit by nukes from that nation. Such ideas have been tossed around in the past.

[Clarke]

I don't think it matters, it quickly becomes unaffordable in war to keep firing Nukes, missiles to a lesser extend but they can have difficultly as well. 

Edited May 27, 2016 by Lightning