Ukunaka

i was wondering if a nation has not reached its 10 city count and builds a project will they have to wait 10 days to build another city even though the first 10 cities don't normally have a timer or would they only have to wait for building another project until they reach 10 cities?

ITT: i upvote everyone who downvotes the OP

i was the 13th downvote, can confirm that this too was actually and underestimation. it should be around 2,681,999 downvotes by the 21st

So what exactly are the powers that Leaders & Moderators have? and what difference in powers do Owners & Leaders have?

I, The Direct Blood Descendant of Batu Kahn, Approve this message

Lets say you are currently in an ordinary offensive war with a nation and then someone places a 5mil Ordinary war bounty on the nation your attacking before you win it but after you declared war. will you be able to collect the bounty or can you only collect bounties placed before the war declaration.

well i do think that the away team should make some cash but not at the expense of the home teams ticket sales because its all about investment, if you play home invest in the stadium, if you play away invest in the players. i haven't really had any problems getting home games within around 5 minutes and the few times i do i clear all the away games even though my players have had much less investment than my stadium so i lose most of them

actually i meant to bring in cash not to remove it, and it could done by betting half of what the blockaded nation has, yes its a gamble but it could still be a way to bring in alot more cash than simply playing regular games especially if you just get someone in your alliance with a weak team to play against you, if it goes the wrong way you just keep playing until you ended up with more. of course not everyone has a strong baseball team which is why this problem hasn't really been addressed before. and yes i did mean blockaded.

You should profit more from home games, the host is the one getting paid for ticket sales. it also would decrease the incentive to even bother with upgrading your stadium.

i get where you're coming from with this but i do not agree with it EXCEPT when it comes to challenge games that could be exploited. Remove Challenge Games for blockaded nations.

i agree with this and also with being able to filter it to see only your alliance's treaty web to a specified degree. IE: 1degree shows your alliance's treaties and their treaties with eachother, 2nd degree adds their treated alliances with no treaty with your alliance, 3rd shows their treaties not in 1st or 2nd degree...and so on

not only is it beneficial for learning the ropes and better formulating how to setup your government but also a good way to maybe establish some good diplomatic ties for your new alliance , such as becoming a protectorate of your first alliance or them even helping to fund your new alliance's growth.

I agree with both of these, definitely the nuke aspect

am i reading this wrong somehow? are you saying that its not possible for a new player to build a city in less than 10 days? cause i had 5 cities on my tenth day without credits or any kind of loan or grant and i didn't play for 3 of those days.

i like this idea actually more so than my 1.5x | 2x cost; i was thinking a little too simple on that matter to be honest, and your idea gets to the root of balancing against wealthier nations alot better than my general flat rate.

a bit of an overreaction don't you think?

Here is our 2 degree Treaty web ~*Severely outdated

to be fair I downvoted like 1, maybe two posts before they posted on my profile whining that i was "downvoting them for attacking an ally", which wasn't even my reason, and then when i told them i downvoted them for making DOW's when they didn't attack anyone and have no control over their alliance's foreign policy they downvoted me, so i declared a forum war against them.

The mircos' numbers have continued to rise ~•The Dawn of the Planet of the Micros•~ is now upon us, the age of the whale is coming to an end.

if this seems too extreme to some, i also suggest a possible reduction of the minimum bounties to around 500k (~750k). this also would open up the dynamics of bounties especially to nanos and lower tier micros while simultaneously alleviating some of the reduction of bounties' effectiveness.

I think it would be cool if there was a way to remove bounties from yourself by paying 1.5x or 2x the bounty amount. • 14 days (or 10) must pass before you can pay off your bounty and doing so will notify the nation that placed a bounty on you, however they will not get their money back. • You may not be in any wars (defensive or offensive) when paying off a bounty • You may only pay off bounties on yourself • (if possible) while in vacation mode days are not removed from the timer required to pay off I Think with the way the current bounty system works, defending against continuous bounty hunters and defeating them can quickly become more expensive than just letting the first bounty hunter biege you and claim the bounty, this provides an option to get rid of older bounties and Incentivises Defending against bounty hunters instead of just taking the loss to get rid of the bounty. with the 14 day period required it also allows enough time for some bounty hunters to have the opportunity to claim the bounty.

•Don't worry you can be our Vassal in the new world•

~•Treaties and Foreign affairs•~ For Diplomatic relations, Market sharing & Treaty Talks contact The Grand War Chief or The Emperor Non-chaining Mutual Defense Pact - United Hoods Non-chaining Mutual Defense Pact - United Nations of Culture Non-chaining Mutual Defense Pact - The Federation Peace Intel & Trade Treaty - Omega Peace Intel & Trade Treaty - Celestia •Protectorates, Vassals & Independent Warbands• The White Horde - Standard Protectorate •Temporary NAPs• Diplomatic - none Peace agreements - Blackstone Legion (expires august 1st) •Trade Networks• The Silk Road ** - all treaty information and web is correct as of july 15th, 5am UTC (12am CST|EDT / 1am CDT / 7am Egypt & Cush time / 12pm Qin Imperial Standard Time / 1pm Ulaanbaatar & beijing time / 2pm Tokyo time)

Eat chips you squid

well considering that a "3rd" world war would be "a" world war your point is pointless. that on top of the fact that there have been 9 global conflicts (5+ continent) and 6 conflicts with higher death tolls than world war 1 the term 3rd is highly incorrect anyways