George

@Alex plz add this like yesterday

yes, defo having units on tht screen would be amazing and a link i guess

Great Cause, shared with BK!

Damn it, no one in your alliance is in my range!

From my understanding of it, either 1. Someone in Camalot without banking perms (aka no power) did it. 2. Someone is trying to use past ... differences to their advantages to spark a conflict The reason I come to this conclusion is for a few factors. Firstly why would you dox someone and make them send the money to your own alliance bank so it would get you caught and prob banned? Next the money was returned, so the player who did it was either not in Camalot or did not have banking perms to intercept the money... aka non gov. Not to mention the talks ive had with a few people, Creed himself stating he thinks Camalot had nothing to do with it. However if it turns out they did for whatever reason, im sure the leader of Camalot would be happy to deal with the issue, providing there is proof, additionally im sure BK would never stand for actions like this by our protectorates... @Thanosis free to reply if he wishes, but im sure he will say about the same thing I am now. On a side note, its not impossible someone is trying to use this to start a larger war, T$ and BK have already shown we are willing to stand by our protectorates and throw down if needed. The idea could have been to frame Camalot, get them hit and cause BK counters so T$ would have to counter our counters.

For the record since ive gotten 30 dms already regarding Camelot and BK protection... I have verified with Camelot and Creed that Camelot are NOT the ones who did it (In fact Creed said that), in fact Camelot even returned the 50mil that was sent to them. Any further question please pm our head of FA or leo, cause ill just point u to this post

I think your lacking the basic ability to see ya'll are loosing, we can impose whatever we want tbch. In fact you should be happy the people making the terms are fair people. Dont like it fight us at a later time to reverse the terms. Lets not forget ..... <was going to be a ss of your alliance's great net damages but down for maintenance>

Went to reply, saw Pre's response... enough said for that La Mafia guy. Now on the topic of that term, I saw someone say "TKR will give the money back if you draw art" or something like that. While they do sometimes allow that to happen, it is not always the case. For example i once messed up a 100mil trade, and within the time i could get to the trade screen it was accepted by TKR, i made a pic and got it back. However i also had a friend on here mess up a sizable trade, get taken and refused to be returned. it would be one thing if TKR's members were simply lucky picking up the trades but thats not the case, there using a bot that constantly checks for mistakes to happen for the sole reason of making a profit. This term does not just help IQ or our colo for that matter, it helps every nation that made a mistake. As for the meme terms, In fact i like some of the meme terms, sure they may not be "needed" in a IC sense but it adds a bit of fun to the game. When i first saw the terms I actually thought that there more than fair and TKR & Co would immediately accept them, turns out I was wrong. but why shouldn't people have some fun in the terms, its a game after all.... We won this one and get to make the terms but the next one we may not, as long as the terms are not absurd in nature who cares? VM nation term is more than acceptable, history has shown that not all war dodgers will be punished by their alliances simply because they can be taxed and help rebuild the alliance at a fast pace. i use punished for a lack of good wording, they are not being punished at all, their just being forced to take the same damage their alliance mates have already taken, the alliance can then choose to punish them by refusing rebuild aid or kicking them. Allowing these nations to skate by and help tkr and co rebuild fast would be counter productive to the entire war, so this term is more than acceptable imo.

Still waiting to hear back on my segment where i shit on alliances drunk af for 5 mins

I complain to leo daily

What? I have not personally stated or have not seen anyone else state "Alexio was the leak", i simply stated i think he was aware of the leaks based on current actions and past. The Ask Alexio meme is more or less us saying Alexio knows BC is leaking and thats why they got hit. Im not seeing where the confusion comes in, the CB is "Bad Company leaking intel" and i mean Alexio has outright come and and admitted that BC has been leaking

Ask alexio?

Quite frankly Alexio, i dont believe it was one person, i think your using this time to toss who ever you can under the bus and try to walk away hands clean. For months now your high gov has been aggressive to IQ, and its been obvious, so unless your just a utterly clueless leader; than you were aware of it and did not give a flying FRICK. This mixed with the months worth of leaks from VG that pointed to be coming from BC? Your party line of "It was Cynic" is not believable to me, I think multiple people in BC leaked and you were aware of it and choice to overlook it. However this specific case i do believe it was Cynic, it was just unlucky for you that we caught yall this time...Like i said just my opinion. So basically this whole thread is "booohooo we got caught leaking"

So the issue here lies in perspective, the Intel leaked was joint VG & IQ Intel that was given to BC in confidence. The fact that BC and IQ dont have a direct intel clause or treaty for that matter is not even a valid argumentative point here, the intel would have been covered under the VG intel clause. Sure you can argue that VG should be the ones to declare on BC and that route was even discussed, but we did not see the point since IQ was already in a good position to declare without making our allies arm up. IQ had a reason for hitting BC from the start, the intel leaked was leaked to maliciously hurt IQ. Additionally why should we care who leaked the intel? It has always been a ideal that the leader and alliance are responsible for their high gov and the actions of their high government. The fact that BC cant run a simple "background" check is not our issue, hopefully they learn from this moving forward. Not to mention the blatantly aggressive and anti-IQ stances the government of BC has made recently.

Press Release from the office of The True Princess of TGH These allegation are false and I Take great offense to them, please see image one. Image 1:

Im sorry you dont meet the 5% threshold for a recount

Firstly i would like to thank those who believed in me early on. Your support has given me a light at the end of the tunnel. Roq had once told me id never win anything and today I proved him wrong with all my amazing supporters. Next i would like to thank Ricky for telling me about this on Kev and Charlies show, giving me the opportunity to run in a election i had no clue existed. Additionally I would like to thank TGH and its members for giving me this amazing opportunity, chances are ill fail, but at least i tried. Finally i would like to name @Kevanovia as my handmaiden, I have no clue if i can do this but i can try at least

Baby don't hurt me, don't hurt me

Don't hurt me

Ask Alexio!

Woh good bank, great place to invest yea this bank is shit, why you would want to own shares in the first place is questionable

Ill have to ask alexio if its funny

Ask Alexio!