TimbitsNCoffee

God I hope this convinces you that you are a horrible person and changes you.

cough someone's short on cash

Why?

Jesus. Took you two rounds before you finally concisely said something. Sweden took a massive influx of refugees, uncontrolled and without proper vetting. Law of Averages says a good 5% of them will commit crimes, number may be higher considering what Sweden considers a "crime". The fact that the media look at every single crime to pounce on it and say every single Muslim is bad is a dangerous generalization. Many of these people are second-generation Muslims who are no better than the neighborhood Crips and/or Bloods. I disparage these actions as a bunch of fakes who simply paint refugees in bad paint. Most of the refugees are women, children, families and minorities that had to flee because they were the most targeted. Using this example not to admit properly-vetted refugees is simply logically flawed. The US has some of the harshest conditions when it comes to vetting, and the no of people that will be admitted as refugees that will commit crimes will be close to zero. There will always be opposition to thing, and immigration is one of the most hotly-debated things. The US really has very little to argue when it comes to refugees, considering they're one of the few groups of people that are actually properly vetted before being admitted. Populist/right wing politics have had a huge surge in Europe, just like Liberalism did in the early millennia, and this will probably go back and forth through generations. Both sides have positives and negatives, and this can be debated a whole bunch. I wouldn't be surprised if Geert Wilders formed coalition in The Netherlands, or Marine Le Pen managed to squeeze a coalition between FN and Les Republicains. It's how the whole "political wave" concept works.

more poetry lol. I don't understand you trying to emphasize a point by using some old-English writing style. Once you start actually voicing opinions without the excessive use of subtle metaphors and excessive figurative devices I may consider properly responding to your arguments. Also, don't take this as me giving up. I have a lot more I can argue.

yakedi yak yak yak, adjectives and pronouns and fancy writing with no actual point. Someone really enjoys virtual political debate ego boosts. Don't compliment yourself too much . You said Multiculturalism was bad and wrong and yet, here in Canada, we're perfectly fine and enjoying ourselves. So much for "I have been right on all such things thus far"

...who tf does that?

what are you on about? All Muslims would have been banned from wearing the niqab.

Muslim.

b-b-but he didn't know it was wrong!!! Legit tho, huh? tf was he thinking?

Political RP? lulz

Immigration = controlled and screened flow of foreigners into the country, with proper documentation. Refugees = undocumented and unscreened mass-flow of foreigners into a country, usually stressing the government's systems. Sweden is a country that has very broad definitions of what constitutes crime. Example: Sexual harrasment includes staring and sexual innuendos sent via any cyber message. Rape constitutes unwanted advances If you were to adjust the laws to US standards, you'll notice that the rates are hella lower than the US, and actually barely moved. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/07/11/are-migrants-really-raping-swedish-women.html

Islamic Arabs were the predominately targeted group bruv. But then again, who am I to forget the 5 Jewish Arabs in Montreal amirite?

T-t-Tana Mongeau? Is that You???

Alright, I really need to toss in my two cents here, since all the shit I'm reading here is ad hominems and tu quoques. A lot of people don't quite understand the background for this. The main motivation for the attack was not Trump, it was not neo-nazism but it was the Quebec Charter of "Values". The Charter of Values was a bill drafted by the Parti Quebecois in 2013, whose main idea was to ban conspicuous religious wear from public servants and/or banning conspicuous wear when using any form of public service. The whole reason the shit hit the fan was because of the fact that the bill opened up room to discrimination based on race, and opened up a debate on when to draw the line of "Religion:State". Long story short, just about everyone sane realized that it was too vague/too risky in terms of reasonable accommodation, and it died. Thank !@#$ing god it did. Bissonette was a pretty big fan of white nationalism and he didn't entertain anyone other than WASP's coming into Quebec. He adorned Marine Le Pen and dismissed many Canadian Conservatives as too moderate. He thought white people will be marginalized by everyone else. He was bullied. He was introverted. His lack of social life turned him into a mental vegetable.

О чем Ñ‚Ñ‹ говоришь Ñ Ð½Ðµ фашиÑÑ‚ *laughs nervously* вÑе Хайль Ленин

Some Analogy after studying the candidates' positions a bit: Le Pen: Nigel Farage. I would call him Trump, but Trump is very tame on legal immigration compared to her. Creeps me out for some reason. Fillion: Nothing really similar to any American. He is fiscally liberal and conservative at the same time, and is socially unbalanced just as much. Also apparently investigated for corruption. Hamon: Bernie Sanders. Flat out identical. Wants to implement a basic income system, legalize weed n stuff, cares about the environment somewhat and wants to reduce the workweek. Name also means "ham" in Spanish. Lol. Melanchon: Retarded brother of Gary Johnson. Liberal Nationalist. Hates NATO, globalization and the EU. Loves welfare, gay marriage and weed. Not sure how to balance a budget with all his social reforms. Flat-out pisshead. Macron: Bill Clinton/Tony Blair. Third-wave kinda guy. Utopian ideas, but sound quite Merkel-esque. Dunno what he's trying to achieve. If I was French I'd probably vote for him.

Libertarian Socialist. -35, -52. You support light restrictions on cultural freedom and heavy restrictions on economic freedom. You oppose most private property rights as well as the abolition of the state. Bleh.

[8:05 PM] TimbitsNCoffee: welp [8:06 PM] TimbitsNCoffee: USRGC signed with Lordaeron [8:06 PM] TimbitsNCoffee: In other more important news [8:06 PM] TimbitsNCoffee: I clipped my toenails right to left today

Micro Drama

BEST OF LUCK TO EVERYONE

That's exactly what I was hoping wouldn't happen. Trump's always positioned himself as "anti-establishment". The establishment gets juicy weapons orders from Saudi Arabia, they don't want to risk business. At what cost?

Can't tell if serious or LSD

Cuz money. Not even joking.