Insert Name Here

I'm sure they were unaware of peas, since they don't talk with AIM for sure. Have fun in your bandwagoning, SK!

Hm, weird considering you guys had switched to your war flag when CoS DoWd you, then switched back to the peace flag after peace with CoS, and just a while ago (right after the HS / CKD blitz on Emoyrea and your 1st wars on them) you switched back to the war flag. So if AIM was still at war with Empyrea and according to you, SK would hit anyone still at war with AIM, I find it odd that you just wouldn't keep the war flag till the dust settled. Seems to me that you guys fancied your chances way more against Empyrea when you saw someone else hit them, which is fair enough. Btw, I hope you've been well. Haven't talked to you since we were both in Arrgh.

Oh, ancient history from when I wasn't even playing the game? Thanks for clarifying!

Eh?

You can talk tough because you have your handlers (TKR and Guardian) always there to protect you. Hell, you probably still have that "We're big nations who can take care of ourselves" quote in your bio even after you had to cry to Partisan so Hogwarts could save your asses from Sparta.

I know, fam. EDIT: too bad they don't have the balls to hit us.

Lmao, even SK is bandwagoning now.

They don't really need any tho. If they're countered they're gonna have t$ and Guardian defend them plus they have nations from those 2 alliances ghosting them. I like both HS and Empyrea, so I hope both have fun.

LPS, is that you?

I for one have seen it all. You guys do have some serious leakage issues.

Ye, opsecs is a tricky matter. You gotta be careful with that.

o7 AIM o/ Pre's toes

?

You're playing it wrong: you're supposed to be pissing millions away, not making money. What a newb!

He had nothing to do with us hitting SA. Originally we were supposed to hit AIM on our own, but since AIM was too low for most of our members, I suggested we hit an alliance that wouldn't leave our biggest nations blueballed.

I can respect declaring a bunch of wars to inflict as much damage as possible even if it means losing more infra. I hope you guys get some satisfaction out of nuking us as much as you can.

You hear that, @Prefonteen?

I got it: Terminal Jest!

You forgot to mention the New Radiant Order doe.

You heard the spontaneous speech - we're not working with CoS.

Uncle Chaunce can grope me any time. How can you possibly know that, does he even have any experience?

I just love how this irrelevant thread about some shitty micro, who's gonna get raided raw (if they haven't disbanded by then) by KT / ET once their war with TKR and co is over, is bumping the CoS DoW thread down.

Hitting Rose would be a breath of fresh air since a bunch of CoS members are former t$. And when has t$ ever fought Rose?

Inb4 Seb downdeclares on all the P&W whales with his 100 cities and 9k aircraft and wins the game.

It really depends on the alliance. For alliances like NPO or BK, command economy makes sense. For alliances like TEst for instance, it doesn't make much sense. TEst, however, is far from selfish. We've ran 5 100% income tax days since reforming (and those of us who have commented on it were willing to have run more of them). We've been boosting our 2 small nations and will continue to do so till they reach the 18 city mark. Several of our members also give interest free loans and make hefty donations to alliance colleagues on a regular basis. I agree with the sentiment that low tax alliances tend to attract selfish players. But it depends on how you run the alliance. If you encourage selfishness it'll obviously be a recurrent issue. But if you foster team spirit, it won't be an issue. Even better is knowing the people you recruit and that they're willing to put the alliance's interests above theirs.