
dtc justice
Members-
Posts
215 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by dtc justice
-
I doubt more than 5 people fully read your 7 posts
-
Why would you expect to get answers about this on a forum? Your better off asking directly to those involved, but we all know they will ignore you as well.
-
This is a good change, not broken at all. Should implement this now so we can test it out in the global @Alex
-
Plane v plane is too weak currently. Ground kills more planes than a dogfight does
-
Make minimizing nation descriptions optional
dtc justice replied to Deborah Kobayashi's topic in Game Suggestions
I can see the benefit of having someone hide all nation descriptions, but to have it the way it is right now? Kind of defeats the purpose of people trying to make their profile purdy -
Excessively Tall Images Designed to Disrupt Normal Page Flow
dtc justice replied to a topic in Game Reports
Lolol what? These are by no means excessively long. The rule implemented i presume is for the nation's that have like 1000 lines of 1 letter per line -
Possible Conclusions on Global War 16's genesis and continuation
dtc justice replied to Phoenyx's topic in Orbis Central
@Alex At what point does Phoenyx become warned for spam? This is like topic 8 with the exact same topic re worded each time -
Imagine when he finds out that swamp was attacked by quack alongside HM, and that swamp is on the defensive and not the offensive. Can't even get his narrative right lol
-
Hes been told this many times
-
Does it count if 1k of them were exploited lol
-
This would be bad for the food. If you look at the data charts food climbs like crazy until war, and then the supply collapses. Rinse and repeat.
-
This was fun to read ngl
-
And those who wanted to buy the sat had to give up near 1bn, we had c20s that sacrificed 2 cities value to obtain the spy sat. With the cost of the project so high, it should be as strong as it is.
-
Congrats on 4 years! We may be enemies right now but I always liked you folks
-
During NPOLT, our side was outnumbered 10:1 in the spy front because of the two spheres having spies depleted from surfs up, and we flipped it. Its not all just purely who has the numbers. The mechanics themselves aren't broken. Lets say for example spy kills capped at 6, your rebuy is 3-4, and with that ratio you will never really be able to grind an alliance down enough to spy military. Lets also say you only kill 500 tanks per op, that basically makes spying irrelevant, so why bother? Reality is there has been long days assigning ops to put us ahead. It is amusing that its always people on the losing side that says x should be nerfed, its simply just the way we all are, we all complain when we shit the bed
-
Lol wow, rawr is salty af Reality is, our side did 5x++ more spy ops than your side in the first few days and they were ops strategically done. We put in the time and effort, and money for said spy sats, so yes it should be one sided for the spy game right now.
-
If spies killed 500 tanks maximum, and spy kills were max 5-6, then there would be 0 purpose for me to organize 500 spy ops for our coalition each day for the first 5 days to wipe your coalition, on average 5-10 hours per day organizing this. The issue here is the lack of a spy team on your side, not a broken mechanic. You're only complaining because you are losing heavily.
- 37 replies
-
- 13
-
-
-
Don't get confused with the ancient symbol and the nazi one, they do face different directions. If one is using the nation one specifically then they have poor intentions.
-
Yarr historically were all ex arrgh that retired, not sure if all of them followed that trend now though
-
Yarr has known to throw down once and a while. Also hai, your rng is broken lol
-
Alex has confirmed that if he made approval ratings have any mechanical purpose, that he would reset everyone's approval back to 0
-
In a lot of global wars the sphere that starts the war wins like half of the time. You need to have it set so that the aggressor has a far better chance of success.
-
During trial of tiers, bk sphere full blitzed us, specifically bk near slotted rose. We flipped the war on them within a day and we very clearly won the first round, we had less members than bk. I guess we're the 1%? The aggressor should have a clear advantage, with the chance of a defensive comeback through coordination and planning. If there isn't a clear advantage for the aggressor, there would never be any global wars. But im sure you would be happy with that coming from RnR. Also, you're saying I have a 9th grade education? Dude, you have crazy long run on sentences lolol.
-
The 24 turn clause is really the only thing that makes all these changes acceptable.