greatkitteh

The maximum DPRK missle range can hit well into Alaska, and Proven DPRK range can hit South korea. The richer China is annoyed ,but isnt as much as to let the USA and South korea at the Chinese border. Plus, diessent cannot happen in North Korea until the people get poorer, in which case the oppisite is happening. The millitary cant hold an candle to the leader as Kim Jong Un has regularly disposed of his uncle, the former leader of the Korean army with all of the generals in Kim jong Ils reign. And the generals wont be helped as the millitary in pyongyang like the peoples guard, are loyal to the goverment. Hitler could have one world war two of he listened to his generals.

One Sheepy, Just because you lost the other game

Honestly, embargoes wont actually matter on a nation.

Posting this to get on the last page.

One

Edited the alliances thing since you guys #@$% about it so much.

I like how the same person who ran away at the alliance now complains about the alliance. Well done.

OOC IRL Dictators can do much worse than what Preiffer might do in Mensa. Do you vote for the "gRand admiral?"

Watch all of Mensa vote dio

Im pretty sure I can grave dig here.

The goverment can generally make a decision in a day unless they want a offensive though. My point is though, Democratic alliances are more welcoming and have a positive attitue towards any voice in the millitary. Napoleon and Lenin can be both officers. Most dictatorial alliances seem to be more picky and refined. I belive this ruins the whole point of an alliance, which is seeking an active but also sociable community over orbis politics. I do see both points though, and I am probably biased over the fact I was never in Mensa or Arrgh with their stalinist command structure and "Dear Leaders". Also, that was quick responce time :0.

What are the most or most relevant democratic and dictatorial alliances you can have in mind? Do you belive a democratic or dictatorial system is better for an alliance? For me -UPN,BOC, and some others are the most "Democratic" alliances in the high tier. I acknowledge there are other medium alliances have democratic systems with some probably more free. -Mensa HQ is the Most dictatorial Alliance in top of my head with their "Dear Leader Preiffer, the protector of all Mensacans". Rose and BK would come close but Preiffer definately got the closest to Kim Jong Un rank. (I didn't start a flamewar ;~ Which system is better? -Democratic alliances are Priefferible prefrable to dictatorial ones in that members are more welcomed in general than in Dictatorial ones. -Also, it does pressure goverments to do more then in dictatorial goverments. Fortunately, UPN, Boc, or Rose doesnt have a two party system -Lastly, it simply feels welcoming to have a variety of members and leaders. I'm pretty sure Mensa or Arrgh won't execute you but goverments are pressured in trying to welcome as many potentional voters as possible compared to a guranteed win.

That is partially true, however the biggest mass allainces VE and UPN are democratic so sending everyone to the death isnt a very good idea. Mass members can simply outlast the organized nation, UPN and VE probably collects tons more than Mensa or Arrgh might be able airstrike.

I am good with the current Upn stlye Mass alliances where we get an academy and basically filter out the one time logging ins. Also, Ten slackers too one Aenir is an alright deal. Sure, we risk pixel huggers, but fortunately UPN is a democracy and thus anyone with importance will get the ranks. Also, it wont matter if Mensa can have 10 out of 20 people lead an alliance properly, Preiffer rules as the dear leader. If an incompetent tries to run for an office in UPN, He'll or she'll be voted out.

I

.

This is actually civil then I thought it would be.

.

.

.

I choose to be the best I can and you know, NOT go full Obama. Dont go full obama. Never go full obama.