Jump to content

Aerys Targaryen

Members
  • Posts

    526
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Aerys Targaryen

  1. I'm not mad because you don't stop, it's simply that it's irritating to read a few comments And I doubt you can defend against some decent blitz with your membership, not to mention it's impossible for 300 nations to attack you.
  2. Where are all the signatures? Anyway congrats on the peace
  3. Do you realize it's not that hard to attack you guys? Even if the attackers get nukes, they will outperform damage several times by just airstriking you nation as you have a very high infra for someone who is playing this style of attrition. One of your another nation with 2500+ infra went to vacation mode immediately after three of our nations attacked it. I wouldn't mind playing this game of attrition if you are going to have high infra cities like the one you have now, not to mention, you send us all to beige (which is a bonus lol) As far as TEst is concerned, they are not as easy as NK or Alpha is, they use some actual military, so don't compare yourself with any other alliances and use that as an opportunity to shit on our coalition
  4. To push us back? erhmm... to beige? Ok thanks anyway
  5. Oh hello Jaguar I'm quite because I'm tired of arguing and not that active in forums
  6. Who would've guessed Alpha would just decommission their military lol?
  7. As far as our involvement with OoS is concerned, it's not really planned. We just went for it
  8. A continuous supply of juicy cities will be available to you. Our alliance expresses it's happiness towards you being 'glad'
  9. Actually we are not that chola The alliance is named after a ddynasty in south India; link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chola_dynasty
  10. We declare war on Alpha, looking forward to your nukes <Curufinwe> where everything is warm and safe and slightly radioactive
  11. Really? Ok whatever lol Yeah sure, sorry about that.
  12. You mean, $2,000,000. Ok, I sent you a message just now, reply there
  13. I like this deal, how about I pay you more than Rahl, you just have to build more nukes, then launch it on our alliance members when I tell you to
  14. If no.2 is not any alliance given above, then I guess it's Sparta.
  15. Good luck guys ! They will have light bulbs fixed everywhere under the clouds
  16. Good luck guys Cornerstone o/ Election results o/
  17. Irrespective of whether we consider nations or alliances, it's a open system. Because number of nations increases, old nations can go inactive, new nations keep joining. Same with alliances, so it's not applicable You're welcome
  18. No, Entropy in a closed system can increase or decrease. Though according to the second law, an increase in entropy means an event is spontaneous, it leaves a conflict with first law which states decrease in enthalpy is spontaneous. Conflict occurs in systems which undergo decrease in entropy and decrease in enthalpy (in which case, according to Ist law, it's spontaneous and according to second law it's not spontaneous). That's where the third law comes in. According to third law, when entropy decreases, that event can be spontaneous as long as (change in enthalpy) > ( Temperature times change in entropy). The second law also states entropy of the universe, which is the sum of entropy of the system and entropy of the surroundings will always increase no matter what. So if we apply thermodynamics to our situation in hand, VE/Rose/NPO/UPN etc.., (previous allies of VE/Rose) = system Every other alliance = surroundings Orbis = Universe. Enthalpy equivalent = none (but can be taken as nation score or military as well, though it won't be accurate) With respect to the system here, less treaties and so more possible ways alliance politics can evolve in future. So entropy increases. With respect to the surroundings, people are still signing treaties. Entropy decreases. LordRahl said (which I agree to), every world ends up with two extreme poles. It's also unlikely that we see more paperless alliances or more break up of treaties, especially because here it's more than just a physical system of gases or molecules. A treaty once formed, takes extreme scenario to break up. Comparatively, it's rather easy to form treaties than to break it. So I don't think Entropy as a concept is applicable here.
  19. This is all a conspiracy by Ogaden to get more comments in this post.
  20. 2nd law of thermodynamics defines what entropy is. Is there any other entropy that I'm unaware of? I was talking about this entropy, S = kb ln(Ω)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.