Caecus

At least Pence is sane.

I may have no skin in this game, but it looks like I'm just an Grumpy Old Bastard.

Oh, I'm over that. I just wanted to point out the fact that only Sparta's leadership would be stupid enough to make the same mistakes and suicide themselves twice. Everyone else here learned that you shouldn't treaty with Sparta the first time you decided to run yourselves in the ground, only Sparta seems to have a hard time with learning from their past mistakes. When you all inevitably reform your broken alliance with the same incompetent leadership 6 months from now, I'm hoping that some members of Sparta (those that don't deserve Sparta's poor leadership) will remember that you guys can't learn from your own stupid mistakes.

Blame the game, not the players. Can't say I haven't heard that one before. And I love seeing you pretend like you have any leadership skills! Why Sparta exists in the first place is beyond me. You would think that even the most stupid and incompetent people wouldn't make the same damn mistake twice, yet here we are: me predicting that you would epically fail, and you proving my prediction correct. Also, nobody answered my question yet! Does Sparta even have allies?

You are missing the last part of that sentence. Since you have such a hard time reading, I've left it here: "...only that it's not going to exist for very long." But please, by all means, prove me wrong. Not that I really expect anything from Sparta, but it would be quite an achievement for yourselves that you find your alliance intact after this war.

Oh, no, I'm not talking about this fight (though depending on who you talk to, it is also a short-sighted move). I'm talking about the time when Sparta suicided itself because one incompetent leader wanted to join TEst and hoped that half of the alliance would join, and the other half would !@#$ off. "Cutting the fat" is what they called it, if memory serves. Again, I have no skin in this game. You guys want to go out on a suicide run, it's entirely irrelevant to me. Just don't pretend like you guys were all ready to disband your alliance again when the war doesn't go in your favor. Oh my, already talking about a "fun fight?" Frankly, your rhetoric here sounds a bit defeatist. Have you guys already lost the war that fast, or does your leadership plan on ditching half of its members and screwing its allies again? Does Sparta even have allies? I honestly don't know jack shit about the new Sparta, only that it's not going to exist for very long.

Ah, then you must have not been in Sparta during that time. Otherwise, you would have known that Sparta was a shit ally, and that it's kind of their fault. Also, Sparta disbanded after the fiasco, so technically, the current Sparta today wasn't the exact same turd it was then, the original Sparta isn't technically still around. I'm just arguing that the only thing you guys did was reform the exact same alliance with the same poor leadership and a different flag after getting your asses handed to you by the Syndisphere during the paperless phase. Perhaps you are right. Who the hell am I to say anything about this war or Spartan leadership? I don't give a damn about either side. I'm not even sure if either side is allied to my alliance. Hell, I'm not even in leadership! I guess the only reason why I think I have any right to interject here is because I (a lowly, obscure member of the infamous Alpha with no saying in its government or politics, let alone on the world stage) have more foresight than at least one of your leaders.

Spoken like true Spartan leadership. Bravo.

You should know your Spartan history before you make such a bold statement. Might I recommend the wiki? Specifically, the section where Spartan leadership deliberately suicided and ran itself into the ground. Sparta as a collective whole might be smart, but it's leadership certainly isn't. Assuming that we agree foresight and competence are characteristics of the "smart."

From my understanding, the alliance is quite strong collectively, but suffers from poor leadership. Sparta seemed to always had poor leadership. The sheer lack of foresight, combined with stupid, self-destructive actions has left it disbanded and scattered on the fan. I'm calling it now, Sparta will disband and break up after this war. It's leadership is simply too incompetent for it to exist.

Sounds like someone hates co-ed schools. Is this analysis coming from personal experience? Also, east Asia is gearing up for war, millions are about to lose healthcare, the president has gone mad to the point where even members of his own party are calling him a !@#$ing moron and are potentially planning for the president's removal, the American economy has lost 75 thousand jobs last month, and the GOP tax plan is about to eliminate the estate tax which is practically the only legal means to level the playing field against the top 0.1% that also conveniently applies to all of Trump's estate, and! AND! Sparta just suicided itself again for the second time in a row. Boy Scouts are very low on most people's priority list.

Are you saying that Tillerson, with a lower IQ score, is somehow smarter? Go Trump yourself! Only the DJT has the highest IQ score because he's the smartest.

"Occupy Whale Street"

"Dog shit?" Don't flatter yourselves. Your comparison of your alliance is an insult to steamy canine turds everywhere. I'm surprised that Sparta even exists, given the long, well-documented history of running yourselves into the ground.

That, and that Trump is better at being corrupt than Hillary. He totally duped a shit ton of people into thinking he's going to drain the swamp.

!@#$ Tillerson, he can't beat the Trump. Nobody is smarter than Trump. That's why he's the president.

Trump is soooooo much smarter than Tillerson. Who agrees? I think Trump has a higher IQ than Tillerson.

I'm a little disappointed this wasn't a sassy DoW from, say, sassy pirates or cutthroat capitalists. Like, "Happy Birthday Pan, eat shit and die" or something. But happy birthday anyway!

This is about 700 years too early -.-

DEDITIO, FUTURE GAULIC SLAVES! Wait, whut. Double-headed eagle? You guys are too far down the timeline for me. -.-

Not sure if the "CANADIAN BABE" would have been interested in you though, Mr. "Habsburg." Let me guess, you have the opposite of a protruding jaw, and you're from the West Virginia equivalent of Canada.

I'm starting to notice a trend about the Trump administration and those who support it: hypocrisy. Unfettered hypocrisy. I wonder if Hillary Clinton took a 35 minute private flight on the tax payer's dime to go have lunch with her daughter?

To be entirely fair, Italians look somewhat fondly upon Mussolini. As much as he took Italy into a war that they couldn't win and killed thousands of his own people alone, at least he made the trains run on time! Correct me if I'm wrong. Maybe it's just all my Italian friends are crazy.

Ah, sorry that wasn't clear. I was assuming you were trying to make a point on behalf of Fuk guy. Obviously not, thus the reply wasn't for you. I'm against infringing on property rights, even those of the lowest, baseless pieces of shit of our society. Out of curiosity, are you for property rights as well? I would imagine that is an area with potential conflict of interest if that's the case.

Ok. So a random private citizen mortgaged his house to buy a useless piece of bronze from a dying Soviet republic and put it on his own private property. What's the difference between that and a Hitler statue on the private property of some neo-Nazi dipshit? This isn't equivalent to statues of Lee. Statues of Lee were bought using tax payer money and displayed on public property (also paid and maintained by the taxpayers). Individual private citizens can be dipshits, just look at our president. But it is an entirely different thing when the state puts them up in city hall. So let me rephrase my question. Where is the state-sponsored taxpayer-funded statue on public property that depicts a mass-murdering psychopath besides the ones of Lee in the southern states?