Lu Xun

I prefer Epi's the clusterf- coalition. But then again, this coalition seems to have f-ed its way to virginity, hasn't it?

Dryad's alliance has been busy getting crushed by e$/t$ for the past few months. They finally agreed to a ceasefire, then one of their raiders started it again a while back. So Dryad does have reason to care about the subject.

I was looking for snake hand puppets, but this seemed more amusing.

Oh, the last comment wasn't directed at you, excuse me.

Didn't we have an epistemology argument a long time back? I'd argue it's more dishonest and hostile to claim you own the facts, although definitely, there are things I believe to be true and not in your favor. Personally, given my experience, I am way too familiar with spin, narrative control, and PR bombing as a way of manipulating situations to your advantage. It deserves some admiration, but also some contempt.

Is this the server where NPO is allowed or the server where TKR is allowed?

Congratulations. Cash Value: $4,242,479,757.00 $313,921,195.00 in food $28,872,312.00 in coal $95,069,888.00 in oil $176,941,325.00 in Uranium $19,584,162.00 in Lead $184,339,992.00 in Iron $424,179,795.00 in Gasoline $22,773,660.00 in Munitions $217,427,072.00 in Aluminum Total Value: $5,702,815,498 Estimating remaining segment of Guardian bank on Synthesis: 20.7bn. Inb4 NPO war stats updates.

We can't actually prove you did it on purpose, and in my opinion, it's just as likely that it's an accident. Right now, my compendium tracks 3 t$ e$ having been advantaged by the glitch, one Typhon accused of having been advantaged by the glitch, one Empyrea member having been advantaged by the glitch, and two GOONS members who have been advantaged by the glitch, one involving an alliance on their own sphere and involving a war that was quickly peaced out. The best response for all involved right now would be for Alex to announce the glitch, as well as that he's tracking the glitch, and that further incidents would be considered intentional and be punished by a nation strike. This should be reiterated on the naval attack page, or alternately, that naval attacks involve a pop-up that issues the glitch warning about the update. === The odd thing I would put, however, is that House Stark and so on have been encouraging naval-intensive warfare on nations that have been deprived of their infra, which would create an increased incidence of the glitch. I'd also point out that this glitch was reported a few updates ago, yet we had further incidents of this by t$/e$. It could be just the inability for information to trickle down to alliance members, but it would have been better if t$/e$ had avoided glitching or used "safe" wars involving members of their own coalition testing features.

Incidents involving this nation: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=177033 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=512705 Incidents involving this nation: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=177128 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=519929

Incidents involving this nation: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=152918 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=515429 Incidents Involving This Nation: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=117574 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=519153 see MAP count discussion below.

Incidents involving this nation: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=24625 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=518448 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=519531

In the interests of full disclosure and fair play, I'm asking that we list all wars that have been affected by naval glitching here. These nations may or may not have self-reported. Incidents involving this nation: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=133181 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=518305 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=518171 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=518305 Incidents involving this nation: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=132794 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=518157 (see Oct 4th, 12:04) https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=520090 https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=520159 (see Oct 5th, 12:04)

Could you please have you or one of your members put up a full documentation of t$-e$ naval glitching into the "bug reports" section? We don't have an idea of the extent of glitch incidence. The apparent incidence rate is with this coming out of two t$-e$ nations so far. This is worth investigation, but does not indicate foul play. If it's significantly more extensive it will require a more critical investigation.

reverted yet, at the last check of the war timeline. Will they be reverted? What about the recent ones by the t$ nation?

This game probably doesn't even know what a Thucydides trap is.

The wording is telling, isn't it? Forced. Like, it'd be against your nature to argue for your former treaty partner. Why have a treaty in the first place, then?

Treaty already cancelled. So will you hit Interstellar?

Treaty's gone. Took them long enough.

You're asking NPO to spam credits? You're asking NPO to spam credits? You're lucky they don't.

Baseball with its sunk costs and repetitive cow-clicker mechanics is a means of player retention. I can support limiting baseball to a certain "sane" number of games per day, then decreasing baseball earnings as populations get baseball fatigue. But killing baseball altogether is a bad idea.

2 trililon? How about 2.5 trillion? You know it's the REAL Knightfall when damages exceed 2x "Knightfall".

I'm aware of your current policy; just thought we'd get closer to 24 hours before the thing closed.

It wouldn't be pragmatic to do so, would it?

@Micchan

Wasn't expecting your auction to end so quickly, so might as well just get this competitor out of the way.