Jacob Knox

Welcome back.

You must have forgotten about it, but your bank records showed that you had made a deposit on April 10th, two days after the deposit you are referencing on April 8th. That's why it still wasn't letting you delete. Now that it has been three days since the 10th, it finally allowed you to delete. Just wanted to clarify this for any game staff that may later read it, so they don't think there's a bug. Have a good day!

Was looking at this nation because they're on Olive when I noticed their unique id had two other nations.

Y'all actually got me for a minute ngl. 😆😅

It looks like your last deposit was roughly 48 hours ago (2 days).

That is completely irrelevant to the topic of this post, and I can assure you almost nobody here can answer that for you. That would be a question you have to ask the alliance's government and if they refuse to answer, then that says more about them than you.

I wasn't liking where this was going, but then you introduced the negative effects and idk.. this might be something I could get behind.

It's all so glorious. You guys are amazing! Looking forward to what is to come.

I'm pretty sure that's intended functionality.

Congratulations on the merge. Like the name, but part of me thinks The Coal Empire would've been interesting too.

This works as intended. It is a part of the April Fool's update.

I'm so glad you asked, and thank you for contacting our SALEs Department. We sell flips through prompt guide all manner of trinkets, treaties, and merce- ha, whoops don't know why that's listed there. As I was saying, you can also choose from our wide selection of flips more human souls..? Hang on, I think I grabbed the wrong sales guide.. let me get back to you on this. click My bets are on the hydrogen bomb. Unless, of course, the coughing baby represents SALE. Then I am contractually obligated to place all bets on the coughing baby.

Welcome to Politics & War

No lol. It's a nice middle ground between MDoAP and ODoAP such that if your ally decides to attack someone that you decided not to attack with them (optional aggression clause and all), you can't be drug into the war by the mutual defense part if an ally of the alliance your ally hit attacks them. You are still obligated to protect your ally in the event of a direct, unprovoked attack.

A member of our prot, FSO, raided Minstero Rupublic (timeline here) and later had war declared by Republika of Ohio (timeline here) with the reason "NONE SHALL EVER DECLARE WAR ON MINSTERO RUPUBLIC!" Upon checking the multi-buster (here), I found they conveniently had a shared IP with a last access date lining up very closely with the other's last active time. Not very convincing information, but enough to raise red flags for me and warrant investigation.

I don't know about anyone else, but I can't see this channel lol Edit: Forgot about the darn browse channels thing

Back in my day we got along with Cata in a bloc called Clock. Now @BettaChecka bullies me sometimes and is friendly other times. It's very confusing.

Enter a negative amount to sell. If it doesn't let you or errors, please open a ticket in the official Discord server through the #support channel.

Welcome to the Forums, friend.

Epi thinks we want to fight Camelot? That's hilarious. I don't know about the rest of EVH gov, but Camelot is very low on my list of alliances I'd like to fight next (if they're even in that list).

I would assume it is for PV, MS, and IT. I have received confirmation in the past that it is from lost units on both sides, though, so in your example you should get 50 steel.

"You can also unlock one National Project slot once your nation has won or lost 100 wars." It only gives you one slot for the first 100 wars lost or won.

Get rid of baseball too by that logic. Leaderboards don't show stats of deleted nations Not opposed to this or raising the max bet, personally lol

It's not meant to have a purpose outside of mindless gambling to pass time and I'm pretty sure Alex kept the stakes low on purpose. Furthermore, I know at least two people have won the big jackpot and I know of someone who has lost a lifetime of $8 billion to keno. So... yeah. I don't think it needs to change.

I mean... the primary reason, in my eyes, that most alliances have Do Not Raid (DNR) policies is to avoid unnecessary escalations outside of when an alliance decides to formally declare war for whatever casus belli(s) they desire. Furthermore, it prevents the game, at least for these top alliances, from devolving into being primarily about war rather than involving politics as well. However, I do agree that NAPs are mostly bad for the game and this one was especially weird with the sub-c10 rule (in my opinion). Furthermore, I tend to like when alliances come to agreements about what types of raids are and are not allowed between their members as well as the terms of such agreements. For example, when I was MA and FA for Aurora, I had seen deals made where an overly inactive member could be raided so long as anything looted from the bank was returned and deals where we mutually agreed to allow applicant raiding under certain conditions. TL;DR: I like rules (DNR) and believe they have a specific purpose, but enjoy seeing alliances make raiding deals.