Jump to content

Clarke

VIP
  • Posts

    2505
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Clarke

  1. To be fair these players only exist to be a nuisance that must be conquered.
  2. We mostly defeated Ivan now, now to drive him away for good.. with constant war.
  3. That's close to my thoughts, an alliance of people largely inactive is not much of an alliance.
  4. Not impossible to continue, difficult? Mostly. 2 Government members is better than just 1.
  5. I wasn't sure if I cared initially about him being attacked and perhaps felt sorry for him but he is bad for business for everyone and I quickly wanted him gone from sight on the market. We only ever had one incident, we were both selling Aluminium for the lowest amounts on the market having a small battle, but I didn't care too much since I usually sell Aluminum in hundreds of units and he only sold in 15 units or a bit more. Which was fine until he sent me a personal trade to buy all my hundreds of units for 400 PPU less than what could be gotten on the market while we were both the lowest sellers.
  6. Yes but wording is incorrect as it was never an order if we're going by the definition, by comparison Guardian actually ordered an embargo. Another piece of incorrect wording would be in the OP where is says "but the most Kangaroo received were attempts from DEIC members to make money of the situation", the plural use of member is incorrect. I'm not trying to spin, it's just the thread has a lot of misused terms that need to be cleared up regarding the embargo.
  7. Let's be fair I'm consistent, I didn't give an order to impose embargoes and I didn't give an order to remove the embargoes, hence embargoes still being in place.
  8. You're assuming we take embargoes seriously and I would actually care if members did not follow my recommendation on embargoing a nation. If it was serious at all I would have made an announcement on these forums like Guardian did for the embargoes they ordered.
  9. Why would I care if I was liable or not for the embargo, the only reason I mention it is because our members were not ordered to do so, they had free will and could have chosen not to if they did not approve of the recommendation of which there would have being no negative feedback towards them because it was not an order for them to carry out. You have a bad example, but none the less it is still a choice and not an order.
  10. It was a recommendation to all members to embargo said nation with listed reasons, after that it was an automated recommendation to new members. Members didn't have to embargo and no effort was made to check if they did embargo, naturally most would embargo.
  11. To clarify it was never an order from the government of VoC, some members may have misinterpreted it as such though.
  12. To be honest it was a different period, going into reset without fighting is kinda sad.
  13. Resources are glitched so they're negative so you lost all the resources for the % taxed.
  14. You have a screenshot of my trades in the OP, they go back to the 9th of November. Yours stretched from the 28th of October to the 4th of November, that's more than 2 days obviously Yours at one point were $10 apart from each other, hows that any different? .
  15. Aamir just reminded me of horrible trading method people did back in Alpha, I wouldn't be surprised if he played Alpha too. By people I probably mean just me.
  16. A non-VoC member showing you're a hypocrite isn't VoC making you look bad. But it does provide some insight, you left your offers running for just over a week and mine are running for a couple of days(not over a week) as they mostly started on the 9th(2 days ago). Lucky I realized I had so many now and will get around to removing them.
  17. Yeah it's a real problem, thought it was fixed in Alpha or at least limited to 5 as suggest some time ago. Some people don't have the time to delete old trades so they can start to pile up, perhaps the less value trades should expire automatically once a limit is reached.
  18. Yeah good idea, at the moment it only works for gradual embargoes over a long period.
  19. Funny post, hopefully I can put an end to this navy before it starts.
  20. There is a limit because at the later stages nations could be built up to have 5 cities or more instantly.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.