Don Juan Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 No Khmer Rouge love up in here?I'm surprised Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge aren't making the lists too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 (edited) In Malaysia we have the worse of !@#$ muslims extremist ....muslims who actually thinks that they owned ALLAH and those muslim all belongs to a !@#$ party called UMNO Edited March 27, 2015 by Vincent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 My favourite is UMNO because the real cause they are after is to enrich themselves and their families plus friends with all sort of ill gotten wealth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Brother Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 In my opinion authoritarian communism is the only kind. Communism is just a corrupted version of socialism, in the same way that corporatism is a corrupted version of capitalism. Most of the countries we see as communist (China, Cuba, etc) are not really communist. They are a mixture of socialism and capitalism which favors the state over private businesses, but still allows them. The USSR and North Korea were the only two major countries that were fully communist since they formed. No, there are no communist countries, because a truly communist society would be stateless, there would be no government at all, and thus no nations. This is why the communists consider a world revolution to be necessary before the kind of utopian communism that is sought can be fully accomplished, because it would be impossible for one nation to embrace statelessness when there are so many other nations that don't. A "fully communist country" is a contradictory statement, because there can be by definition no countries under communism. I think you're over-simplifying an ideology that includes an incredible amount of ideas, concepts and sub-ideologies. There are so many types of communists, and they often do not agree with each other. True communism is by nature democratic, more democratic than the democracies we cling to so dearly today. However, a lot of communists believe that in order to "safeguard the revolution", one has to establish the dictatorship of the proletariat, or worker's dictatorship, not only to strengthen and further pursue the revolution, but also to facilitate the massive changes that must take place, to educate the proletariat, and to prepare the people for the changes to come. It's in the dictatorship of the proletariat that the risk of corrupting factors occur, because power has a tendency to corrupt. To communists, authoritarianism is simply a means to achieve the end goal of communism, it has no more value to them than a hammer does to a carpenter. It's not the tool in itself that is the goal, it's the house it builds. I'm not a communist myself, but I think you're wrong, and even slanderous to go around stating truths about an ideology when your actual knowledge and understanding of it is rather limited. If anything, it speaks more about the nature of your own character, than of the things you are attempting to state anything about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Smith Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 My favorite Islamic extremist group is by far MILF. Are you referring to Moro Islamic Liberation Front, or different? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Fire Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 Let's make a list. 1. Hitler 2. Stalin 3. Mao 4. Imperial Japan 5. Genghis Khan Stalin is above Hitler. Though, I would label Judaism as #1. *waits for anti-semite comments.* Quote _________________________________________________________________ <Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line. --Foxburo Wiki-- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pol Pot Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 (edited) No Khmer Rouge love up in here? what is wrong with khmer rouge? Stalin is above Hitler. Though, I would label Judaism as #1. *waits for anti-semite comments.* the zionists are working with the bourgeoisie to opress the working class people of palastine. i think they should be one, capitalism as a whole should be 3. it go like this 1. Demonic Spirits which are the cause of a lot of the ill in the world today 2. The Illuminati/Satanists 3. Capitalists 4. Zionists 5. Nazis All of these people are linked together, so you might put them into one. Edited April 2, 2015 by Comrade Pol Pot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aisha Greyjoy Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 People should understand, Nazi's are just considered the worst of the worst, period. Presenting evidence to the contrary, truthful or not, only makes one look like a Nazi apologist. So, lets accept no Hitler, no Nazi's, no White Supremacists, no anti-semites, but pretty much everything else is ok. That's the world we live in. Arguing on a game message board isn't going to change squat. You know, except make people question if you're a closet Nazi. And if we did start drawing the line, as many above have said, its hard to be precise and fair. Easier to just say "no Nazi's, move along please" Quote Duke of House Greyjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elsuper Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 1. Demonic Spirits which are the cause of a lot of the ill in the world today 2. The Illuminati/Satanists 3. Capitalists 4. Zionists 5. Nazis People should understand, !@#$'s are just considered the worst of the worst, period. Presenting evidence to the contrary, truthful or not, only makes one look like a !@#$ apologist. So, lets accept no Hitler, no !@#$'s, no White Supremacists, no anti-semites, but pretty much everything else is ok. That's the world we live in. Arguing on a game message board isn't going to change squat. You know, except make people question if you're a closet !@#$. And if we did start drawing the line, as many above have said, its hard to be precise and fair. Easier to just say "no !@#$'s, move along please" I'm trying to figure out what the censored word is. I would have guessed "Nazis," but Pol Pot was able to say it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odin Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayayay Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 (edited) People should understand, !@#$'s are just considered the worst of the worst, period. Presenting evidence to the contrary, truthful or not, only makes one look like a !@#$ apologist. So, lets accept no Hitler, no !@#$'s, no White Supremacists, no anti-semites, but pretty much everything else is ok. That's the world we live in. Arguing on a game message board isn't going to change squat. You know, except make people question if you're a closet !@#$. And if we did start drawing the line, as many above have said, its hard to be precise and fair. Easier to just say "no !@#$'s, move along please" I disagree, !@#$'s are simply more talked about (due to our own Euro-Centrism) and receive more hate but there is no !@#$ way you can say what Imperial Japan did wasn't as bad, if not worse, than what the !@#$'s did. Imperial Japan killed just as many people than the !@#$'s did but the way they did it is what makes them worse. Rape of Nanking, Unit 731, etc. Actually, here's a quote about Nanking The seventh and last person in the first row was a pregnant woman. The soldier thought he might as well rape her before killing her, so he pulled her out of the group to a spot about ten meters away. As he was trying to rape her, the woman resisted fiercely ... The soldier abruptly stabbed her in the belly with a bayonet. She gave a final scream as her intestines spilled out. Then the soldier stabbed the fetus, with its umbilical cord clearly visible, and tossed it aside. I'm trying to figure out what the censored word is. I would have guessed "Nazis," but Pol Pot was able to say it.Nazis with the apostrophe is censored. If you don't include it it isn't. Edited April 2, 2015 by underlordgc Quote Orbis Wars | CSI: UPN | B I G O O F | PW Expert Has Nerve To Tell You How To Run Your Own Goddamn Alliance | Occupy Wall Street | Sheepy Sings TheNG - My favorite part is when Steve suggests DEIC might have done something remotely successful, then gets massively shit on for proposing such a stupid idea. On 1/4/2016 at 6:37 PM, Sheepy said: This was !@#$ing gold. 10/10 possibly my favorite post on these forums yet. Sheepy said: I'm retarded, you win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Fire Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 (edited) I'm trying to figure out what the censored word is. I would have guessed "Nazis," but Pol Pot was able to say it. This is exactly why you don't censor such a word. It's the dumbest !@#$ thing I've ever seen. Edited April 4, 2015 by Fox Fire Quote _________________________________________________________________ <Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line. --Foxburo Wiki-- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphelion Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 If we're going to ban any RP or references to Islamic extremism, then we should also go ahead ban any references to European/Western Imperialism too. Caused millions of deaths by conquest and exploitation. Totally offensive too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.