Jump to content
Mutsuo Toi

GOOD! Commies Threaten To Leave America IF Trump Elected!

Recommended Posts

Mongolian soldier is a military, not an immigrant in fact back in the era when the mongol invade China there was a corruption.

 
 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGBdEb1_dL4

 

Does this look good to you fam? :^)

The point is that the wall, like all walls, failed because they are useless without every inch being constantly manned. There is already a massive steel fence along the border and people climb right over it. So unless Trump plans to permanently place the military along the entire length of the border, it's a complete waste of everyone's time and money.  

 

As for the migrant crisis in Europe, it's the wests fault for exploiting the middle east for a century. It wouldn't even be a bad thing if not for just that, which lead to the rise of Salafism and the ideological war we have now. The problems in Europe are only being worsened by nationalist ideologies. Mass migrations always come with problems, but the situation in Europe is different than the situation in the US. Our migrants aren't caught in the middle of a culture war, which is the problem with the European migrant crisis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problems in Europe are only being worsened by nationalist ideologies. 

So basically you wanted to say that we should tolerant to the refugees rapist who rape our child? If not, what else we could solve European problem instead nationalism since our government gone full of cuckoldry? You got any better ideas to save your own country from those bloodthirsty that supposed to be a bigoted, homophobic refugees instead waste people time and money? That's some kind of treason in here.

 

Wise man had said "If you want peace, prepare for war.", I'll said Trump militarize idea is dump but is worth every single coin.

Edited by lizard noob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically you wanted to say that we should tolerant to the refugees rapist who rape our child? If not, what else we could solve European problem instead nationalism since our government gone full of cuckoldry? You got any better ideas to save your own country from those bloodthirsty that supposed to be a bigoted, homophobic refugees instead waste people time and money? That's some kind of treason in here.

You heard it here folks. Immigrants of all kinds are child rapists....  :rolleyes:

Listen buddy, there is a whole hell of a lot more crime being committed in any given place by the citizens themselves than by their immigrants. In response to your BS video, secularism and Atheism is the fastest growing religious ideology in Europe, even if you include a few million Muslim migrants. Pew Research predicts that Muslims will make up about 8% of Europe's population by 2030 and about 10% by 2050. Further more, the Muslim fertility rate is expected to drop while the non Muslim fertility rate is expected to slightly increase. Other research also suggests that about 1/3 of people raised Muslim in Europe no longer embrace Islam as adults. 

(All of this data is from pre-migrant crisis, however, 2 million refugees is nothing when compared with a population of 742 million people. It's like trying to taste a drop of orange juice in an Olympic sized swimming pool.)

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tis indeed.

 

 

Our southern immigration problem can be solved by simply reforming our migration policies to actually be reasonable. I can assure you that a wall will do nothing. It's funny how he cites the Great Wall of China. Does he realize that wall was a failure? That no matter how tall or strong it was, people could just..... Go right over it? And did?......

Globalization is good. In fact, it's the only future humanity has. The world needs more unity not nationalism. I enjoy how the worlds economy is so interdependent. It creates a world where people must work together rather than kill each other for ridiculous things like nationalism, land, race, or ideology.

 

They ain't comparable in the scenario you're speaking of. China's great wall is often summed up as a failure due to not stopping the Mongols when you know, it was around for a long time and helped against many raiders/tribes. It's reason for failure wasn't because people could climb over it either, but because it could be attacked with enough force by a military power. Illegal immigrants aren't a military power and even the cartels as armed as they are wouldn't dare such a thing. 

 

I think in truth one wall is not something that'll work as effectively as possible, it'll stop some people and hopefully help tackle the drugs too... but two walls... now that would really nail it. 

 

Globalisation stopping war is in the same realm as the EU stopping war in Europe, a pat on their back fantasy, or propaganda as it should be called. Tell me how Globalisation stopped America's many incursions over the years. Tell me how it stopped Russia. How did it stop what happened in the Balkans. What happens in Africa. So on. I suppose it stopped war between Western European countries, they are ultimately ruled by the same puppet masters after all. 

 

I'd argue you've got it the wrong way round. When people talk of such concerns they ain't concerned about a foreign state, they're concerned about foreign people, people who don't integrate, who become a nation within a nation, a fifth column. That you see is division, not unity as you put it. People must integrate for unity and that is what those against immigration, globalisation, and so forth want... integration which is the sensible path to follow. It won't end well otherwise. Nationalism is unity, multiculturalism is disunity.

 

As for the migrant crisis in Europe, it's the wests fault for exploiting the middle east for a century. It wouldn't even be a bad thing if not for just that, which lead to the rise of Salafism and the ideological war we have now. The problems in Europe are only being worsened by nationalist ideologies. Mass migrations always come with problems, but the situation in Europe is different than the situation in the US. Our migrants aren't caught in the middle of a culture war, which is the problem with the European migrant crisis.

 

Well no. The migrant crisis if we're talking the current one is down to Germany, Sweden, and those lot in pushing for all those migrants to come leading to the current situation. In regards to what happened 100 years ago we can't change that, if they hate us for it and always will then oh well nothing we can do, surrendering everything to them certainly won't matter to them. However we can stop them from entering if necessary. We can rip down what causes them to hate us if they decide to come over here. All these problems ultimately exist because lets face it, western governments subscribe to the religion of globalisation and so have their hands tied behind their backs on the matter, nothing must get in the way of cheap labour, profits, and capitalism. 

 

You heard it here folks. Immigrants of all kinds are child rapists....  :rolleyes:

Listen buddy, there is a whole hell of a lot more crime being committed in any given place by the citizens themselves than by their immigrants. In response to your BS video, secularism and Atheism is the fastest growing religious ideology in Europe, even if you include a few million Muslim migrants. Pew Research predicts that Muslims will make up about 8% of Europe's population by 2030 and about 10% by 2050. Further more, the Muslim fertility rate is expected to drop while the non Muslim fertility rate is expected to slightly increase. Other research also suggests that about 1/3 of people raised Muslim in Europe no longer embrace Islam as adults. 

(All of this data is from pre-migrant crisis, however, 2 million refugees is nothing when compared with a population of 742 million people. It's like trying to taste a drop of orange juice in an Olympic sized swimming pool.)

 

France's prisons are 70% Muslim for one. People who are not integrated are going to naturally be more criminal I'd say, they don't have any unity with the rest of the nation. 

 

They keep importing more of them, their birth rates are high, in a generation there are more of them again with high birth rates (even if they drop a bit as said), and still more will no doubt be imported. These people are not integrated, in fact non-integration is instead seemingly championed... non integrated people aren't going to leave behind those mad hateful beliefs. 

What I'll tell you is that it won't end pretty. What is seen as nasty today will be kid's stuff compared to what people will want in the future if this keeps going as it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(All of this data is from pre-migrant crisis, however, 2 million refugees is nothing when compared with a population of 742 million people. It's like trying to taste a drop of orange juice in an Olympic sized swimming pool.)

Its closer to a 'splash' of orange juice in a bird bath in your scenario.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They ain't comparable in the scenario you're speaking of. China's great wall is often summed up as a failure due to not stopping the Mongols when you know, it was around for a long time and helped against many raiders/tribes. It's reason for failure wasn't because people could climb over it either, but because it could be attacked with enough force by a military power. Illegal immigrants aren't a military power and even the cartels as armed as they are wouldn't dare such a thing. 

 

I think in truth one wall is not something that'll work as effectively as possible, it'll stop some people and hopefully help tackle the drugs too... but two walls... now that would really nail it. 

 

Globalisation stopping war is in the same realm as the EU stopping war in Europe, a pat on their back fantasy, or propaganda as it should be called. Tell me how Globalisation stopped America's many incursions over the years. Tell me how it stopped Russia. How did it stop what happened in the Balkans. What happens in Africa. So on. I suppose it stopped war between Western European countries, they are ultimately ruled by the same puppet masters after all. 

 

I'd argue you've got it the wrong way round. When people talk of such concerns they ain't concerned about a foreign state, they're concerned about foreign people, people who don't integrate, who become a nation within a nation, a fifth column. That you see is division, not unity as you put it. People must integrate for unity and that is what those against immigration, globalisation, and so forth want... integration which is the sensible path to follow. It won't end well otherwise. Nationalism is unity, multiculturalism is disunity.

 

 

Well no. The migrant crisis if we're talking the current one is down to Germany, Sweden, and those lot in pushing for all those migrants to come leading to the current situation. In regards to what happened 100 years ago we can't change that, if they hate us for it and always will then oh well nothing we can do, surrendering everything to them certainly won't matter to them. However we can stop them from entering if necessary. We can rip down what causes them to hate us if they decide to come over here. All these problems ultimately exist because lets face it, western governments subscribe to the religion of globalisation and so have their hands tied behind their backs on the matter, nothing must get in the way of cheap labour, profits, and capitalism. 

 

 

France's prisons are 70% Muslim for one. People who are not integrated are going to naturally be more criminal I'd say, they don't have any unity with the rest of the nation. 

 

They keep importing more of them, their birth rates are high, in a generation there are more of them again with high birth rates (even if they drop a bit as said), and still more will no doubt be imported. These people are not integrated, in fact non-integration is instead seemingly championed... non integrated people aren't going to leave behind those mad hateful beliefs. 

What I'll tell you is that it won't end pretty. What is seen as nasty today will be kid's stuff compared to what people will want in the future if this keeps going as it is.

1. Not one wall, but two? Even though the massive steel fence doesn't even work? I mean what exactly is the significant difference between a wall, and the fence that's already there? 

Globalization has promoted world peace and international cooperation. The idea of a New World Order is more sincere and less diabolical than you think. Multiculturalism is the foundation of the United States of America. This nation was founded by immigrants, for immigrant so that people could be free to believe what they want and practice what cultures they want. This in and of itself creates the greater American culture. You're just a xenophobe. 

 

2. All these problems exist because of western exploitation. It's not something that happened 100 years ago. It's something that's been happening for nearly 100 years and continues to this day. It's the opposite of globalization that is the foundation of this problem. The foundation of this problem is division. 

 

3. France is becoming more anti-Muslim by the day and of course these people aren't going to integrate when they're greeted by a welcoming committee of white supremacist protesters. It's like expecting Vietnam vets to be proud to come back home when they're greeted with "baby killer". You want people to integrate? You have to stop alienating them first. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.Even though the massive steel fence doesn't even work? I mean what exactly is the significant difference between a wall, and the fence that's already there? 

>>iirc that fence you are referring to doesnt stretch the whole border, only small portions of it, so comparing it to a big beautiful wall is more complicated than you're downplaying it as.

 

The idea of a New World Order is more sincere and less diabolical than you think.

>>you're part of why many older people dislike the newer generations

 

Multiculturalism is the foundation of the United States of America. This nation was founded by immigrants, for immigrant so that people could be free to believe what they want and practice what cultures they want. This in and of itself creates the greater American culture.

>>Its closer to a tossed salad than a melting pot, but there are numerous people who name 'American' as their culture and not 'x-country natives who happen to be in america' so... it can contribute to what is seen as the american culture, but that does not mean all cultures are beneficial or welcomed. accepting everything means accepting everything, and nobody in their right mind would want everything that is out there. You'd literally have to be !@#$balls insane.

 

You're just a xenophobe. 

>>roz is a xenophobe

 

It's the opposite of globalization that is the foundation of this problem. The foundation of this problem is division. 

>>just try to force me to do what you want me to do and see what happens

 

You want people to integrate? You have to stop alienating them first. 

>>stop scaring the shit out of the local populace and you've got a deal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1.Even though the massive steel fence doesn't even work? I mean what exactly is the significant difference between a wall, and the fence that's already there? 

>>iirc that fence you are referring to doesnt stretch the whole border, only small portions of it, so comparing it to a big beautiful wall is more complicated than you're downplaying it as.

 

The idea of a New World Order is more sincere and less diabolical than you think.

>>you're part of why many older people dislike the newer generations

 

Multiculturalism is the foundation of the United States of America. This nation was founded by immigrants, for immigrant so that people could be free to believe what they want and practice what cultures they want. This in and of itself creates the greater American culture.

>>Its closer to a tossed salad than a melting pot, but there are numerous people who name 'American' as their culture and not 'x-country natives who happen to be in america' so... it can contribute to what is seen as the american culture, but that does not mean all cultures are beneficial or welcomed. accepting everything means accepting everything, and nobody in their right mind would want everything that is out there. You'd literally have to be [email protected]#$balls insane.

 

You're just a xenophobe. 

>>roz is a xenophobe

 

It's the opposite of globalization that is the foundation of this problem. The foundation of this problem is division. 

>>just try to force me to do what you want me to do and see what happens

 

You want people to integrate? You have to stop alienating them first. 

>>stop scaring the shit out of the local populace and you've got a deal

 

1. That doesn't explain what the significant difference would be. The fence actually covers quite a bit of the border in various forms.

https://law.utexas.edu/humanrights/borderwall/maps/final_border_fence_locations_oct_2013.pdf

Regardless, people still go right over it because walls are not unscalable. So what is the difference between the wall that's already there and can't even be finished and the one that Trump is proposing which would be even more unrealistic than the already unrealistic fence? 

 

2. Orlly? Because I'm pretty sure it was the older generations that established things like the Bilderberg group and the foundations of a new world order. In fact, my generation seems more opposed to groups like this than any previous generation. And I'm not too fond of the older generations myself so I couldn't care less how they feel. The world turns.

 

3. Obviously there are things out there that are almost universally loathed, like Nazism. A Mexican looking for a decent life is not one of those things. 

 

4. Indeed.

 

5. Salafism. That's what happens. 

 

6. I'm not the one promoting xenophobia here.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Not one wall, but two? Even though the massive steel fence doesn't even work? I mean what exactly is the significant difference between a wall, and the fence that's already there? 

Globalization has promoted world peace and international cooperation. The idea of a New World Order is more sincere and less diabolical than you think. Multiculturalism is the foundation of the United States of America. This nation was founded by immigrants, for immigrant so that people could be free to believe what they want and practice what cultures they want. This in and of itself creates the greater American culture. You're just a xenophobe. 

 

2. All these problems exist because of western exploitation. It's not something that happened 100 years ago. It's something that's been happening for nearly 100 years and continues to this day. It's the opposite of globalization that is the foundation of this problem. The foundation of this problem is division. 

 

3. France is becoming more anti-Muslim by the day and of course these people aren't going to integrate when they're greeted by a welcoming committee of white supremacist protesters. It's like expecting Vietnam vets to be proud to come back home when they're greeted with "baby killer". You want people to integrate? You have to stop alienating them first. 

 

1: The "fence" is nothing compared to the "wall". The wall will be larger, longer, and more manned naturally. If they build two (one of them can be significantly cheaper due to how it'd work) than you get a patch of land between the walls that they can control comfortably. Of course this means even more border guards, but that'd mean more jobs created and the increased effectiveness tackling illegal immigration and the drug trade would be well worth it I'm sure.

 

Well actually all instances of multiculturism as far as I know, even the so called "bring me your poor" was ultimately an excuse to import cheap labour. In regards to America they also had a lot of land to fill with people, it was after all the "New World". It's not so new anymore and situations change, just because a country was X does not mean it must remain that way forever. 

 

You've drank down that propaganda I'd say. I gave you the reasons they push mass immigration and multiculturalism and it ain't for "world peace", "love", or anything else. It's pure greed at work, uncaring greed that causes harm but they do not care for they will not suffer. They have their money, their large homes away from immigrants, and of course their bodyguards. 

 

I'm a Nationalist, a cultural one specifically. If that is synonymous with Xenophobe because thats another word they've rendered meaningless by it's application to anyone who dares question immigration then so be it.  

 

2: So you agree with me? The exploitation is mass immigration, it is globalisation, so on. You're for all that exploitation and then argue that those who are against such exploitation are for exploitation? It's all very odd to me. I don't want to take advantage of cheap laborers being imported. I don't want children working as slaves to make some cheap tat on the other side of the world. Why are you for it? Because if you support globalisation, sadly but ultimately you support such things. Remember who guides globalisation along. 

 

3: That won't pass the test with anybody at this point. The way people see it is such people have been protected greatly, with any who have dared attack them being made to lose their jobs, be attacked in the media, jailed, and other such things. A long time that went on and they never integrated... giving them a soft hand will not cause integration, especially not when multiculturalism is championed. "Haven't integrated and formed a gtetto where the people see themselves as more X than Y? Thats cool, we'll be so diverse, how lovely".

 

Like I said a firm hand is needed at this point as otherwise you'll see much worse in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1: The "fence" is nothing compared to the "wall". The wall will be larger, longer, and more manned naturally. If they build two (one of them can be significantly cheaper due to how it'd work) than you get a patch of land between the walls that they can control comfortably. Of course this means even more border guards, but that'd mean more jobs created and the increased effectiveness tackling illegal immigration and the drug trade would be well worth it I'm sure.

 

Well actually all instances of multiculturism as far as I know, even the so called "bring me your poor" was ultimately an excuse to import cheap labour. In regards to America they also had a lot of land to fill with people, it was after all the "New World". It's not so new anymore and situations change, just because a country was X does not mean it must remain that way forever. 

 

You've drank down that propaganda I'd say. I gave you the reasons they push mass immigration and multiculturalism and it ain't for "world peace", "love", or anything else. It's pure greed at work, uncaring greed that causes harm but they do not care for they will not suffer. They have their money, their large homes away from immigrants, and of course their bodyguards. 

 

I'm a Nationalist, a cultural one specifically. If that is synonymous with Xenophobe because thats another word they've rendered meaningless by it's application to anyone who dares question immigration then so be it.  

 

2: So you agree with me? The exploitation is mass immigration, it is globalisation, so on. You're for all that exploitation and then argue that those who are against such exploitation are for exploitation? It's all very odd to me. I don't want to take advantage of cheap laborers being imported. I don't want children working as slaves to make some cheap tat on the other side of the world. Why are you for it? Because if you support globalisation, sadly but ultimately you support such things. Remember who guides globalisation along. 

 

3: That won't pass the test with anybody at this point. The way people see it is such people have been protected greatly, with any who have dared attack them being made to lose their jobs, be attacked in the media, jailed, and other such things. A long time that went on and they never integrated... giving them a soft hand will not cause integration, especially not when multiculturalism is championed. "Haven't integrated and formed a gtetto where the people see themselves as more X than Y? Thats cool, we'll be so diverse, how lovely".

 

Like I said a firm hand is needed at this point as otherwise you'll see much worse in the future.

1. So basically there is no difference at all other than a shit ton of wasted tax payer dollars? Because I mean, Operation Jump Start cost over a billion dollars, still didn't solve anything and that was but a fraction of what Trump is proposing.

Multiculturalism is the foundation of the United States. Mexicans already live here and have made massive contributions to American culture already. They're as American as you and me and allowing them to move here is not going to destroy America considering they are already an inherent part of our culture. Nationalism is stupid, but you're beyond nationalist. 

 

2. I was referring the the exploitation of middle eastern nations. And I don't want slave labor in the US either, which is exactly why I think a wall is a stupid idea. Want to end illegal immigration in the US? Want to end slave labor in the US? Then end the war on drugs and reform our immigration process so that people can move here legally. 

 

3. Statistics say that you're wrong with growing secularism in Europe, including within the European Muslim community. The social divide is fueled by xenophobia, not innocent people looking for a better life. But it's because of all the xenophobia in Europe, that I think those Muslim migrants are better off going just about anywhere else. The ghettos formed in Europe for these migrants were not built by the migrants out of intention. Nobody moves to a new country and wants to be hated and stuffed in a camp. You accuse migrants of not integrating while refusing them any chance to. That's what I'd call xenophobia. Unfortunately, it's this cultural conflict that feeds the ideology known as Salafism. The more you express hatred for Islam the more Muslims are inspired to hate the west. Do you not see the self feeding cycle here? Continuing the cycle will only produce the same cyclical results. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. So basically there is no difference at all other than a shit ton of wasted tax payer dollars? Because I mean, Operation Jump Start cost over a billion dollars, still didn't solve anything and that was but a fraction of what Trump is proposing.

Multiculturalism is the foundation of the United States. Mexicans already live here and have made massive contributions to American culture already. They're as American as you and me and allowing them to move here is not going to destroy America considering they are already an inherent part of our culture. Nationalism is stupid, but you're beyond nationalist. 

 

2. I was referring the the exploitation of middle eastern nations. And I don't want slave labor in the US either, which is exactly why I think a wall is a stupid idea. Want to end illegal immigration in the US? Want to end slave labor in the US? Then end the war on drugs and reform our immigration process so that people can move here legally. 

 

3. Statistics say that you're wrong with growing secularism in Europe, including within the European Muslim community. The social divide is fueled by xenophobia, not innocent people looking for a better life. But it's because of all the xenophobia in Europe, that I think those Muslim migrants are better off going just about anywhere else. The ghettos formed in Europe for these migrants were not built by the migrants out of intention. Nobody moves to a new country and wants to be hated and stuffed in a camp. You accuse migrants of not integrating while refusing them any chance to. That's what I'd call xenophobia. Unfortunately, it's this cultural conflict that feeds the ideology known as Salafism. The more you express hatred for Islam the more Muslims are inspired to hate the west. Do you not see the self feeding cycle here? Continuing the cycle will only produce the same cyclical results. 

 

1: Where exactly did I say such a thing exactly. The absolutism asked with the wall staggers me considering how weak it all is. Can you guarantee it will stop 100% of the people? You can't guarantee 100%? Then it's a waste and doesn't work. So you think, so you think, but look how many hyphened nationalities exist. Even many who consider themselves as part of a people still feel separate enough that they will accept and label themselves with a hyphen. I personally despise the idea as you either are... or you ain't. As far as I'm concerned it's another trick where supporters say it represents unity when in reality it represents disunity. 

 

Again, you've been taken in by that propaganda they've spread to help push their globalisation. Nationalism has many forms but they'd have you believe they're all invasive, that they're jackboots on the streets, killing minorities, or whatever other lie they've spread. In reality Nationalism can also be defensive, the only reason a people are able to unite and resist an oppressor. Is that Nationalism that gives people hope and allows them to resist oppressors stupid? Should they have just rolled over and let their land be stolen instead because "borders are stupid, so is Nationalism, and the land doesn't really belong to them anyway"? I disagree with such propaganda completely. Nationalism can be a force for good and it's the only way we will be able to overthrow globalisation, and the plagues of mass immigration, multiculturalism, and political correctness it brings with it. 

 

2: Trump has said the wall will help tackle the drug trade, and that he wants the process to bringing people legally into the country to be expedited. In regards to Marijuana to legalise it for medical purposes and leave it up to the states for recreational. He wants illegal workers to be replaced by legal ones, and I keep missing why that is such a bad thing. Borders are important, knowing whose in the country is important, among many other reasons. Plenty of people go to countries legally, it takes time, it takes effort, in some countries it can take a great deal of money... why should illegals just get a free pass? I mean would you let known terrorists in your country? You for border controls then? Or are you completely absolutist on the matter?

 

3: You're completely incorrect. I've been called names like you're calling me now on this very forum for saying that the ghettos need to be broken and people distributed across the country (as should be done everywhere). So what it amounts to is if I want the ghettos gone I'm a Xenophobe/Racist. If I were to say leave 'em then I'm a Xenophobe/Racist. It really doesn't matter what I say on such matters, I and anyone else for that matter is a Xenophobe/Racist if they oppose immigration. However to inform you on the matter I am extremely against ghettos, absolutely despise the concept. Just another thing that helps kill integration.

 

Your statics are ultimately meaningless. If I were to play the game of dueling statics you'd call mine worthless and I'd do the same for yours, it's not a difficult game to play. Islam is not very forgiving of those who leave the faith, as the cases of apostates I've brought up which not surprising nobody cared about, in fact it was the Muslims (the criminals in such matters) who were defended. The message to the mad dogs in Islam with such things is they really can do as they like. As long as you coddle them and let the crazy ones keep the power they will make sure that population of theirs develops into a nice solid fifth column. 

 

"Don't you see fighting them is what the terrorists want" is what that amounts to. Empty platitudes of "Je Suis Paris" are meaningless, you need real solutions. If their faith is the source of their strength, of their transformation... then you break it. Disperse them from their ghettos. Make clear that apostates, homosexuals, women, and whatever other group will be protected (a few cases of Muslims being arrested for hate crimes on the news will soon send the message). Ban their faith schools. Ban their usage of "Islamic dress". Hold the family responsible for their family member's Islamic radicalisation (they should have made sure their family member didn't go down the wrong path). Deport any possible. Dismantle their mass immigration... and things will be fixed very quickly I assure you. Such methods work unlike whatever you think should be done which amounts to all of nothing as far as I'm aware. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How has the west exploited the Middle East?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How has the west exploited the Middle East?

 

How is it this even a question? It would be easier to ask "which parts of the world haven't been exploited by the West?".

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is it this even a question? It would be easier to ask "which parts of the world haven't been exploited by the West?".

I dont think you've been exploited enough. You need more democracy. READY THE DRONES

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Big Brother is a disgusting person and he is big on guilt, to put it bluntly the west should be selling emasculated men like him as slaves to those it supposedly exploited. I say sell as well because slaves aren't cheap and the Americas had to pay for their slaves that Africans (Muslims) sold to them. He's a real mess. Sad. 

Edited by Clarke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Big Brother is a disgusting person and he is big on guilt, to put it bluntly the west should be selling emasculated men like him as slaves to those it supposedly exploited. I say sell as well because slaves aren't cheap and the Americas had to pay for their slaves that Africans (Muslims) sold to them. He's a real mess. Sad.

You know you dont have a life when Clarke is telling you this :P

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this kind of like when millions of people said they were going to move to canada if Obama got reelected and

they didn't?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Big Brother is a big fat mess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Commies are too broke to leave the states!  :lol: Dump Trump. He's a torture-loving, billionaire celebrity, NSA apologist. Screw that guy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.