Lycanthoer Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 (edited) Having overseen three alliance mergers so far, I propose a "merger" offer button. Clarification EDIT: Originating with the leader, accepted individually by members. Edited March 2, 2016 by Lycan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magicboyd25 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Seems like some issues would come of this if someone would go rogue. Imagine a rogue Rose gov member merging Rose into Mensa (watch out Keegoz Kurdanak is just waiting to coup you). I'd say only do this if the in game alliance leader can use this function and that the other alliance needs to accept. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ayayay Posted March 1, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted March 1, 2016 lolno. It's up to the members of the alliance as to whether they want to merge or not, not the government. 8 Quote Orbis Wars | CSI: UPN | B I G O O F | PW Expert Has Nerve To Tell You How To Run Your Own Goddamn Alliance | Occupy Wall Street | Sheepy Sings TheNG - My favorite part is when Steve suggests DEIC might have done something remotely successful, then gets massively shit on for proposing such a stupid idea. On 1/4/2016 at 6:37 PM, Sheepy said: This was !@#$ing gold. 10/10 possibly my favorite post on these forums yet. Sheepy said: I'm retarded, you win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Livius Clades Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 lolno. It's up to the members of the alliance as to whether they want to merge or not, not the government. The thing is if the Members are merged into an alliance they don't want to be apart of they can simple leave the Alliance and go elsewhere. I think a merger system is a good Idea. It just has to be a system that can't be abused. And of course bother organizations would have to agree to it. Quote Fire is nice eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiki Mod Dr Rush Posted March 1, 2016 Wiki Mod Share Posted March 1, 2016 lolno. It's up to the members of the alliance as to whether they want to merge or not, not the government. This. Also such a system would allow mergers to keep their tax farms, which I personally am not a fan of. It's also very low on the list of things that Dev time should be spent on. 2 Quote 23:38 Skable that's why we don't want Rose involved, so we can take the m all for ourselves 23:39 [] but Mensa is the cute girl at the school dance and she's only dancing with us right now to get our friend jealous 23:39 [] If Rose comes in and gives Mensa what she wants, she'll just toss us aside and forget we ever existed 23:39 zombie_lanae yeah I do hope we can keep having them all to ourselves 23:40 zombie_lanae I know it's selfish but I want all their love 6:55 PM <+Isolatar> Praise Dio Pubstomper|BNC [20:01:55] Rose wouldn't plan a hit on Mensa because it would be !@#$ing stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrezj Kolarov Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 PW is a game about nation simulation, nations can form alliances between each other but nations should always be the ones in control. 2 Quote People's Republic of Velika: National Information Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doktor Avalanche Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 lolno. It's up to the members of the alliance as to whether they want to merge or not, not the government. PW is a game about nation simulation, nations can form alliances between each other but nations should always be the ones in control. ^^^These. Leave it up to the individuals to make the effort and not the morons in charge. Quote Beer. Damn Good Beer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lycanthoer Posted March 2, 2016 Author Share Posted March 2, 2016 (edited) ? I'm talking about a button (similar to invitation) that allows them to accept mergers, individually. Originated by the alliance leader. 90% of the replies should reconsider with that clarifying knowledge. And...it wouldn't be implemented soon regardless. It's a new feature suggestion. Edited March 2, 2016 by Lycan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doktor Avalanche Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 ? I'm talking about a button (similar to invitation) that allows them to accept mergers, individually. Originated by the alliance leader. 90% of the replies should reconsider with that clarifying knowledge. And...it wouldn't be implemented soon regardless. It's a new feature suggestion. So an Alliance leader sends a merger request to another Alliance leader, correct? Then, an Alliance Merger button is pressed by the Alliance leader who thus accepts the other Alliance into their Alliance, still following here? The end result is the Alliance leader who submitted the merger request now has their alliance merged into the submitted Alliance leaders alliance? Is this the correct assumption? No need for clarification. Nations should still submit on their own to an Alliance and not have the leadership do it for them. its a part of the game to lose membership when mergers occur. Quote Beer. Damn Good Beer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurdanak Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 (edited) Clarification EDIT: Originating with the leader, accepted individually by members.Isn't that practically the same as each member leaving the alliance and joining the other manually? I see what you're getting at, I think, I just don't see it as necessary. With that said, though, I do appreciate seeing a newer member of the community thinking up suggestions. Edited March 2, 2016 by Kurdanak 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lycanthoer Posted March 3, 2016 Author Share Posted March 3, 2016 (edited) @ Kurdanak, and some others - thanks for taking the time, to understand what I was saying. Disagreement from there I can respect. Especially as at the end of the day "I don't see it as necessary". @ Lord Asmodeus, clarified to address this, short answer - no, a misunderstanding. Think of "invitation offer" but, "merger offer" (individually, each nation accept/reject), signed by both alliance leaders. Past that, the comments generally have nothing to do with misunderstanding... And... I agree with Kurdanak - Mods feel free to shut this one down. But not the party: mods, chill dudes, admin, Sheepy - all non-haters PARTAY AT THE GOAT HOUSE haters will harsh the mellow Edited March 3, 2016 by Lycan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.