Dwemyrn Posted December 12, 2015 Share Posted December 12, 2015 Being that certain continents produce certain resource, why not give a small resource production bonus of the resources that can be dug up on that continent. i.e. +25% or something. And if a nation is on the same continent as the alliance is, they could get a +50% bonus to resources mining. idk if it's a good idea, but just throwing it out there. 1 Quote -removed by thor- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Alex Posted December 13, 2015 Administrators Share Posted December 13, 2015 Being that certain continents produce certain resource, why not give a small resource production bonus of the resources that can be dug up on that continent. i.e. +25% or something. And if a nation is on the same continent as the alliance is, they could get a +50% bonus to resources mining. idk if it's a good idea, but just throwing it out there. Don't you think that would just make "colony" alliances? Like GPA NA, GPA AF, GPA EU, etc. so everyone could get the bonuses while still having diversity? 5 Quote Is there a bug? Report It | Not understanding game mechanics? Ask About It | Got a good idea? Suggest ItForums Rules | Game Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ELPINCHAZO Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 NOPE,nope nope nope. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
---- Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 Don't you think that would just make "colony" alliances? Like GPA NA, GPA AF, GPA EU, etc. so everyone could get the bonuses while still having diversity? I absolutely agree that this would be the result of the proposed system. But what is so terrible about such a 'colonial' order? Are not some protected alliances similar to colonies? Considering the present state of some protectorates, I think that the proposed change would add more geographic realism to the already existing system. Plus, a squabble over geographic control would offer a far more realistic casus belli than the present-day emotionally-driven wars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiki Mod Dr Rush Posted December 13, 2015 Wiki Mod Share Posted December 13, 2015 NOPE,nope nope nope. Quote 23:38 Skable that's why we don't want Rose involved, so we can take the m all for ourselves 23:39 [] but Mensa is the cute girl at the school dance and she's only dancing with us right now to get our friend jealous 23:39 [] If Rose comes in and gives Mensa what she wants, she'll just toss us aside and forget we ever existed 23:39 zombie_lanae yeah I do hope we can keep having them all to ourselves 23:40 zombie_lanae I know it's selfish but I want all their love 6:55 PM <+Isolatar> Praise Dio Pubstomper|BNC [20:01:55] Rose wouldn't plan a hit on Mensa because it would be !@#$ing stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lelouch Vi Britannia Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 I absolutely agree that this would be the result of the proposed system. But what is so terrible about such a 'colonial' order? Are not some protected alliances similar to colonies? Considering the present state of some protectorates, I think that the proposed change would add more geographic realism to the already existing system. Plus, a squabble over geographic control would offer a far more realistic casus belli than the present-day emotionally-driven wars. Enough reason here to implement this DO IT Quote Ex-Archduke of Defence for BK 3 minutes ago, Buorhann said: @Lelouch Vi Britannia - BK needs you, but they really don't deserve you. Thanks for the dankness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacob Hanson Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 (edited) Don't you think that would just make "colony" alliances? Like GPA NA, GPA AF, GPA EU, etc. so everyone could get the bonuses while still having diversity? It most certainly could, but hasnt half the goal of the color bonus switch ups to change the game and attempt to create war? Couldn't making alliances do this create an interesting variety? Im sure it would be difficult for some alliances to exist on 4-5 different AA's themselves. Also with the recent flat rate color stock bonus change, there would be no incentive for the GPA to have 5 alliances on green rather then 1. I absolutely agree that this would be the result of the proposed system. But what is so terrible about such a 'colonial' order? Are not some protected alliances similar to colonies? Considering the present state of some protectorates, I think that the proposed change would add more geographic realism to the already existing system. Plus, a squabble over geographic control would offer a far more realistic casus belli than the present-day emotionally-driven wars. This. It could work like color stock bonus Total nations/alliance nations = continent bonus? Ideally OOC certain powers hold more claims to certain resources then other through pure political clout. I think that could be applicable to this formula. Oo the formula is bs btw Hopefully it conveys my point, have fun writing a real one Edited December 13, 2015 by Jacob Hanson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwemyrn Posted December 13, 2015 Author Share Posted December 13, 2015 Maybe some kind of bonus just for location. Each continent has their own? There is a timer on alliance location change, hence why I've brought about a suggestion otherwise there is no real reason for the timer... Quote -removed by thor- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwemyrn Posted December 13, 2015 Author Share Posted December 13, 2015 Maybe North America Reduces city cost (Yes that is a subtle native america genocide reference), while South America Increases resource production (Reference to the rainforests and shit.), Africa lowers the cost of military (Africans have civil wars often I've read about) Europe would lower the cost of nation projects (In reference to their many great monuments such as the Eiffle Tower, Leaning tower of Pisa) Australia would give a revenue bonus of like 2%, (Reference to them being the #4 nation in terms of economics.) Quote -removed by thor- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacob Hanson Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 Maybe North America Reduces city cost (Yes that is a subtle native america genocide reference), while South America Increases resource production (Reference to the rainforests and shit.), Africa lowers the cost of military (Africans have civil wars often I've read about) Europe would lower the cost of nation projects (In reference to their many great monuments such as the Eiffle Tower, Leaning tower of Pisa) Australia would give a revenue bonus of like 2%, (Reference to them being the #4 nation in terms of economics.) Naaa I like your original proposal. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.