Pasky Darkfire

These are the types of Quality Petty Sass posts I live for. If I hadn't wasted all my reactions today, I'd give you 5 of them. Auto-tipping would be cool. I typically only play away games and these kids are apparently stingy millennials. All in all, As someone who plays like 400 games every two weeks, I like these changes.

Do I?

I'm sure we could keep it going forever regardless because its And that's how it plays

I feel this version fits better with the "Circular argument" we're having. Now back to the more important part of that post. The Second part. You didn't give me an answer.

I love circular arguments. Lets keep this going, aye. There are, by your admission and definition, Nazis on both sides, but it's okay if they're hiding behind anime girls, Right? Only if you surrender first, bb. Surrender your ❤️ to my undying love.

Hey. I'm fricking beautiful thank you very much.

*Looks at price of nuke, looks at bounty, now back to the price of nuke now back to the bounty.* Not even worth the dec.

I don't work with them. I was one of the most vocal about not working with them, and I'm still pissed, after 4 months, about the situation. So. Go shove your deflection somewhere else.

"It's okay to be directly treatied with cheating Nazis, but only as long as they are pretending to be Anime girls" is the other statement here. jfc This last page and a half is a mess.

The fact that Your Leader Name isn't Rusty Shackleford Is disappoint.

Ahh. Well. Also agreed.

I mean. I don't assume anyone is 100% malicious. And I don't believe everyone is 100% innocence. It's just that in this instance, to me personally, your grey is a lot darker than the other greys on the palette. And this:

If it wasn't for the "noway connected to this platform" bit in there, I had something snarky to say. But I reread it. But the rest of it brought it back. Telling Roq to not live in the past is... ironic to say the least When his entire CB for entering the war was ALL about the wrongs done to him in the past. Or Some logs. OR because interests. It changes by day. But the past stays pretty constant.

Fun fact. While it is spelled Beetlejuice on the box art for the cover. The tombstone in the movie actually spells it as betelgeuse. Edit: It is also spelled the second way on the coffin when they dig up the grave. just remembered that. Pic for reference:

As I've presented my evidence, until furthermore comes to light, I'll just leave this one to Kev then. Also, You can throw that image around all you like, mate. It's not going to stop me from saying what I need to say.

I'm aiding in evidence that your self interest trumps your actual care for the rules in regards to this situation and that this is a frivolous report at best against someone in the community. Discrediting your reason for reporting isn't really analysis, It just using what you've said here as further evidence on why this report shouldn't be taken seriously.

Banter between individuals in threads is bound to happen. He made a direct line at you, you returned it, and then it ended UNTIL: You directly told him you had reported him. Which continued your derailment of the topic and assisted in verging the topic off more than Kev ever did with his one post. You did. And you did it twice, while continuing to derail the topic further while you said you would not derail it further. I'd also like to submit this as an admission of Guilt to the Moderators. Along with: Obviously. I'd also thrust this forward as evidence that Inst does not have the best interest of the community in mind when he makes these reports. His means to an end here is nothing more than threats and his admitting that he'd much rather see everyone banned than anyone post anything, and I quote again, he finds "objectionable in your(kev's) coalition's posting" makes it clear he only has his interests at heart.

As a Witness to this supposed "derailment" of the topic, I'd like to put forth that Inst has chosen it only fitting to report Kev because he made a direct post/line of questioning at inst and did not report others, some of which are on/in/around his side, who actually made derailments. Inst instead of taking discourse has decided to report the the one post directed against him. Which then instead of leaving it at a blind report for the moderators discretion to make a judgement, he chooses to continue in a mocking tone inform Kev he's been reported, furthering this "derailment" he take such offense to. He then furthers this along by making a Forum Report thread and tagging Kev in it. I feel this is an attempt to use the moderation as a weapon especially when he opens his second post with: As if his own "Coalition" is immune.

Fraggle, You are the salt of the earth. Where would we be without your steadfast guidance in these troubling times?

Ohoo! Well Played. lmao. Good strategy. So this is just one thing I noticed a lot of. NPO gov has lambasted and blasted TKR, CHaoS as a whole, and Kettogg for maintaining miniscule-civil relations with one another without having paper ties. I've had a couple NPO people tell me that "If you have such good relations with someone, you should just have a treaty and get it over with." When I brought up "Then why didn't you just say screw everyone else and keep your paper tie to BK?" I get downvoted. And I never got a real response, I feel. I think the response I got was somewhere along the lines of "We had a backroom deal with people to prevent yada yada yada." What they're shitting on others for is exactly what they are doing/did. NPO maintained good relations with BK, so good, in fact, that they were willing to come to their defense when they thought BK was going to lose the war, without any actual paper ties. The original t$ thing is another one, and then the new t$ thing is I guess an extension of the first one but still technically a new one. And I'm with you on not dredging the OWF. If I want to read the same circular argument over and over again, I'll just go make another thread and title it something along the lines of "NPO <Insert generic question here>"

That doesn't make any sense in the context of the conversation going on. But I'll bite. Please inform me of an alliance who has said one thing and then done another as much as NPO has in the last 3-4 months. I mean. Definitely nothing against you personally. Your banter is entertaining and makes me laugh. Probably could be good friends when this is over. But your government makes me question if they understand the words coming out of their own mouths most of the time.

Coming from an NPO Prawn, that's hilarious.