Jump to content

Cypher

Members
  • Posts

    558
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Cypher

  1. TEst vs Guardian, Alpha, tC That's literally an upper tier clash made in heaven.
  2. >is from BK >claims others don't have autonomy kek
  3. Giving up already? Is it because I proved you wrong? Awww. Fingers crossed your whole alliance gets rolled next war because of what you did etc etc
  4. I didn't realise getting banned by the admin for having multis and then lying to your alliance about who owned the other nation constituted as leaving the game. The more you know. ...and I said hated and are you really nitpicking over me saying "everyone" rather than "by almost everyone"? Final thing, if we're going to judge an alliance just because of their name, then we may as well call everyone who's in MI6 Holton.
  5. That nation count ratio is far off. Oh and don't forget that we have no allies that can help us out in this situation, unlike what you had when you had over 200 nations in direct allies not involved. But don't let me stop you; keep grasping at straws about how you came out of a high chance of failure and won. Maybe you'll get one right. Maybe not.
  6. I was more talking about if tS were to attack an alliance in PnW because of (That terrible game that is totally irrelevant and I shouldn't be bringing it up anyways) that it would be Alpha rather than NPO. Is this a jab at me or Alpha? Because I just want to make this clear, I'm not in NG and I have no plans on joining them anytime soon. Edit: Oh and that isn't true Ivan and you know it isn't. If they were hated by everyone, why would they be in a game ending bloc and not getting rolled by it every 3 months?
  7. No because the majority of the effort would be on Alpha because of the hatred between NG and MI6. It's possibly the most toxic relationship I've seen in recent (That terrible game that is totally irrelevant and I shouldn't be bringing it up anyways) history.
  8. You've fought in a "20 vs 150" situation and won? Please, do tell me when that was and against who. I'm sure I'm not the only one who would love to see the spin of this.
  9. You mean a nation in an alliance that hasn't really been attacked has a larger military than an alliance that has been targeted by a grouping of over 150 nations? Im shocked!
  10. We've taken 5b in damage, sure but you're forgetting we're still outdamaging all the alliances we're fighting combined. Try not to spin anything we all have access to, k?
  11. A) these logs have been posted quite a few times both on the OWF and Discord. If this is the first time you've seen them then tell your cat's dog's sister to get off their nation so you can start looking at your own PC. These logs were shown to prove TLF to be /liars/. To help remove the "false narrative" TLF may have painted in several nation rulers. Isn't that the same thing tS and Partisan claimed to do when Alpha and tS broke up?
  12. I'm talking more about member count rather than percentage increase.
  13. "We've got gov members in this organisation but it's definitely not sponsored by Mensa. Oh and we might defend those gov members because they're in my AA."
  14. Accepting new members =\= competency. By that logic, TEst should be utter shit and Rose should be better.
  15. Okay so the majority of the members aren't from Mensa but there's a decent amount of government members from Mensa participating in it. Got it. edit: clarification
  16. I'll wait for you to be in a 20 man alliance to prove me wrong.
  17. You'd have to extremely dense to believe a 20 man alliance could take a coordinated blitz to the face, zeroing their entire military, and leaving behind pure econ score and still remain in the top 20.
  18. As long as micros and small nations are starving, we shall continue nuking people!
  19. But that's not how chaining treaties work. UPN attacked BK, x and y counters, TLF is now obligated by their treaty with UPN to attack x and/or y, depending on if it is necessary or not. If UPN said they don't mind TLF not defending them because they don't want to get involved then that's fine. What isn't fine is TLF then entering in on an ODP on the other side.
  20. You mean when we told them not to come? I'd thought you of all people would know that after the several beat downs you received in the other universe.
  21. Thanks for having our backs NK! May the nuclear gods bless you on this fine day!
  22. No one is complaining about TLF not joining in on the offensive, it's just their unwillingness to respect the piece of paper that said they will defend UPN.
  23. In case you're wondering, we defended our MDP partner (I'm not going into the whole attacking SK thing).
  24. itc we have alliances opting to go in on an ODP rather than an MDP. (Yes I know this post was a recognition of hostilities)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.