Phiney

It's what he'd do

Sigh. Missed the part where a TEst member left for ts ey. Hense making the score graph look like we demilled and ts bulked more.

DOFA

... Pretty easily to be honest

Nut up or shut up Ron. And this was all very entertaining good show chaps much more interesting than the recent treaty fests.

Your lack of belief is all the credibility we need mate

Cmon son. Something can be compelling until proven otherwise, I was compelled and now ogaden has shown that to not be true. There's no need to be a bit of a dick about this I'm not saying the points ogaden is making now are wrong, I'm just pointing out it voids another argument being concurrently made by others.

Don't worry I entirely understand the point you're making, I'm just pointing out you're also making an unintended point which goes against what a few people have been saying on the other side of things. Both points against the current score system cannot be true as they are opposites.

Memph made the most compelling argument against the change I heard here https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/10936-changing-the-score-formula/page-8# and there's also a thread In the cdg saying the same thing from others. Edit: also your too big with full mil theory was debunked thoroughly ages ago by seabass when he did the maths showing that the vast majority of people that are at the top now have more people that can hit them not less.

I have a strong feeling Sheepy is playing really badly if you are keeping him down with this setup. Bare in mind this is the exact opposite argument others are making about why this change is bad when they say a large nation with no military is basically immune from war as the only people that can attack them have much less cities, so whilst you may be proving yourself right here in this scenario where it's definitely not a big problem just a very niche one, you're making great evidence for why the change isn't bad at the top like some are claiming.

Judging from them deciding to specify a time limit on when they will allow arrgh to go back to raiding them, combined with stating a long enough time for some people to view the terms as harsh, id say not. Not great positioning. Gooooooo groupthink!!

For anyone having a jolly good time reading /rereading this, the war ended by our terms being met and Hereno stepping down.

Could at least take daylight savings into account, it's 2am for most of Europe now, definitely worse than it was for European players.

It's been removed

Wait, he had only 1 more city than you and half your infra. I fail to see how he was "unbeatable". That seems like a completely normal scenario for a 1v1 war. You either failed to have allies that could help you (a big part of this game is working with others and using co-ordination) or you just got beat fair and square. Seabass already proved he hit you and then bought the tanks, so the numbers aren't flawed at all. If you were going to stop people declaring on people with a single city less than them the amount of available targets would be rediculous.

Hereno just admit your point completely failed. You've been proved wrong repeatedly, if anything the only point you made was in favour of the change, good work.

Terminus Est supports our protectorate and hereby enters any wars we bloody well want to.

Sorry seabass Hereno is completely unable to see himself as anything but a shining light of factual correctness. Thankyou for these conclusions and interesting statistics In general though, shines a lot of light on the situation.

By hit me I clearly don't mean in game I refer to hit me with your rebuttal of the post I referenced which you've now twice avoided whilst still replying.

Who is to say the war wasn't declared when you were in range and would have been in range even with the changes, just you lost military and they gained military since. Most wars end with the two parties no longer being in range.

But has 0 military so would get stomped by literally everyone? as soon as he builds up he's in range of the big guys. Makes sense to me. Using your scenario, declares on a 9 city nation and then builds up putting him with little military and in range of people with much more military than him. Easy counter.

Glad to see our strong history with Hereno being revived here. Another convincing post you've made here mate.

hit me

did you even read seabass' reply to your post? it completely debunks your bullshit

I actually like that one ship can blockade, it forces people to use slots on stuff other than the main three units forces decisions and variety. Just FYI ships are about to get a buff in terms of destroying improvements but I like number 1, just stealing a little bit of income as a nice little buff.