Sketchy

Yer wtf Juan, the CIA did some bad stuff. But even tho it doesn't count unless you kill 1 million people, the CIA is American and American = Evil so you round the 73 people up to 1 million. Maths yo. Fidel Castro dindu nuffin

Protectorates are generally a larger alliance protecting a smaller alliance from raiders/war in return for closer relations. Its essentially grooming future allies. Forced protectorates via war are not the same thing. Chola is a Trident protector, Paragon is just some alliance you forced to fight your battles for you basically. The two are very different.

Yer wtf Juan, Castro only killed thousands of people not millions like Hitler did. Everyone knows it doesn't count unless you kill at least 1 million people. Fidel Castro dindu nuffin.

Yo sheepy, can you add the total tally of each improvement a nation owns, and their average total commerce, to the nations api?

Um.... how did Rose go up 4k score and 20 cities exactly? Yer some of these figures are way off, we have 272k tanks not 390, and alot of the figures that should have went down, went up for some reason.

Yo sheepy, when you doin the Tax Brackets? You know its a good idea, stop stalling.

I suggested something similar to a "Military Management" page all the way back in the beta because I argued that all the shit should be on one page. Sheepy knocked it down for some reason I can't remember and here we are. "What I had an issue with was the reposting of an idea, implying it was your brilliant idea, with no attribution or reference of the previous suggestion. This in real life is called plagiarism." I thought it was obvious I was being intentionally facetious but apparently the bold step by step text, and trump pictures didn't do it for you. Outside of that I didn't "imply it was my brilliant idea". Seems like your just looking for things to whine about. I don't see the original poster of the idea who replied to the thread whining about it.

Huh I missed this part the first read through. So your line of reasoning is, because someone suggested it before, noone else can resuggest it? I knew exactly who suggested it before me (he replied in this thread), I only re-suggested, because it hasn't been added yet. I reposted it, because incase you haven't noticed while you were busing trying to seem smarter than you are, but lots of suggestions go unnoticed and unreplied to. It might make sense if you thought it was a bad suggestion, but the fact you agree with it and still have a problem with me posting, really illustrates how much of a moron you are. Have a nice day tho.

"Maybe I should expel you all and renew the government as Rose did" hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha 10/10

I see The Empire Earth Space Defense Settlement Defense Front has changed their name again.

All I see is an idiot getting himself rolled.

This is a stupid counter-argument. If his design was good in the first place this wouldn't be a problem. This game is full of tedious navigation between pages that just shouldn't exist. This isn't the only example of this either, the sites full of it. Good design = making the use of your website as intuitive and simple to navigate as possible. Bad design = having to click 4 times to do something you should be able to do in one.

No comment.

Super Helpful Tip #1: Add a "max all troops" button on the military page. Stop making people click through all these pages you fascist. Innovative Idea #2: Add a "max troop" and "decom all" troop button on the military page for each unit type. Creative Solution #3: Add the ability to purchase infra in every city to X infra. No pictures because the sheer brilliance of this idea requires no illustration. /thread

Man, and I thought Avansies were bad. Everytime I think I've seen the worst, a bigger moron like Tbomb here pops outta the bushes and starts having a seizure all over the forums. Orbis World Forums: The gift that keeps on giving.

I feel like 1/stdev(cities) would be more accurate.

Yes that is all we wanted ayy.

I think you deserve props for actually building your alliance up a bit and being around for 123 days before posting a DoE. Too many of these little micros make a DoE day one and then die 2 days later.

That flag tho top notch

Formula. Formula. Formula. Formula. Formula. Formula. Formula. Formula. Formula. Formula. Formula. Formula. Formula. Formula. Formula

Fortify should be removed. Using rock paper scissors as the example: Soldiers Beat Ships (Soldiers should be able to execute a "boarding", killing some ships, and if an immense triumph, giving a penalty to navy effectiveness.) Ships Beat Planes (Reduced infrastructure damage, instead have naval attacks shell air bases killing some planes) Planes Beat Tanks (Air Superiority) Tanks Beat Soldiers (Normal Ground Attack) Tanks Beat Planes (Ground Superiority) Soldiers Beat Planes (Ground Superiority) Planes Beat infra. (lol) Additionally, ships should have a "Naval Raid" option, that costs 4 maps, and loots similar to ground attacks and a higher rate, but does no infrastructure damage.

You'll never be able to prevent bank hiding, not completely, unless you outlaw it completely. The issue is bank looting as a concept in itself. Wasn't bank looting added as a way to stop people from hiding their shit in an alliance bank? Now people just hide the entire bank. Easiest solution would to be to scrap looting, scrap bank looting, and instead, have won wars result in stealing a % of a persons income before tax. Only way that could be exploited, is if said person intentionally reduced their own income out of spite, but that would just hurt them too.

Seems fine to me. The main concern would be this helping pre-existing established alliances more than new ones, as they have the capital to build their members up faster as a result. Despite this, there needs to be a way for people to catch up to the existing playerbase, the advantages outweigh the negatives imo.

I don't think locking out banks for alliances under 5 members permanently is a fair solution. Just make it so they can only use the bank after say, the first 10 days after their alliance is created, or when they reach X members. The biege idea is just terrible, when an alliance is bieged, that is when bank access is most important, so they can provide resources required to rebuild and fight back. DO NOT implement that.

Why not lock out bank usage for a certain time period after an alliance is created, or unless they reach X amount of members. Seems fairer that way.