Tiberius

Still yet to see any evidence that baseball is not balanced and not equal. Quit trying to score political points.

The system we have now, everyone has developed with. All strategy was devised using the current war system. To make all wars end with beige is going to benefit those with a bigger rebuy the most. Hence it is adding an imbalance to the game and gives one group an advantage over the other. It also nullifies the strategy of up declaring. The suggestion in isolation is a fair one, however it does not take into account the imbalances it will create in the gameplay/meta. Thus I can not support it.

The irony is strong with this one.

I'm gonna build city 21 and make Scarfalot pay for it.

Wow, they let you out too huh?

Can you link your game suggestion for it to be removed please.

I like point 2. It allows Nations to play with the mechanics to figure out the best combos etc scot free. Rather than having to make excel sheets etc.

Let's not pretend it's a new feature and only new Nations can utilise it. It's been here for years, it is completely balanced and it is equal for everyone. No one is disadvantaged by baseball unless you make the choice not to play it. Find me another mechanic in this game that can be said the same of.

Here it is the treaty that now ties TCW bloc to Coalition A. The end of slot fill gate.

Because it's: A. Not game breaking. B. It's completely balanced. C. Players are actually playing the game while playing baseball, increasing server traffic and earning the game revenue via the ads. Also to tag on, in all the suggestions regarding beige the main argument against its removal is the ability to be able to rebuild or fight back in wars. Removing baseball earnings does stop the tactic of baseballing to rebuy military if you are blockaded which means Nations can fight back even when blockaded. Which funnily enough you are happy to argue is a solid reason to not remove beige in those threads.

Care to explain why you bother?

Nope not game breaking at all as I've already explained. The evidence suggest thus far that getting the majority of 1500 Nations to do anything is a miracle in itself let alone have them all play a 1000 games of baseball. Your figures are all hypothetical, and those hypothetical numbers can be matched by the other 1500 Nations and both sets of Nations make the same. It's completely balanced. You keep saying it's not a suggestion based on political bias, and then constantly throw in your bias. Goons, NPO 20 cities, Opus dei member counts. There is plenty of mechanical imbalances across the game, baseball isnt one. Why dont you work on suggestions to fix unbalanced mechanics, which would be better spent effort than trying to nerf your political enemies.

It isnt game breaking if the other 1500 Nations also do it. Hence its balanced and equal. No one is disadvantaged by Baseball unless you choose not to play it.

Baseball is literally the only thing that is balanced and equal in this game.

So NAPs dont mean shit when it's your coalition breaking them, okay. If P&W did the Olympics, Coalition A would secure Gold, Silver and Bronze in the mental gymnastics category.

In the reports forum there is Baseball bot report and Alex says in there that there is player support from the surveys to keep it as it is. Baseball is completely balanced and it isnt restricted to tiers, certain playerbase. It is something that many players enjoy about the game and in some instances the only thing that keeps them playing. Everyone can play and you dont need to put much effort into earning the revenue. When you list an alliance in a suggestion and those opposed to that alliance then come in and support said suggestion, it is obvious that you want to change baseball for political reasons/vendetta against that alliance.

@Alex I disagree with any further changes based on political vendettas. There is a lot of players who enjoy baseball and as you have proven that the majority, via surveys etc, are okay with it how it is.

When Coalition B alliances were peacing out individually it was celebrated. Now the shoe is on the other foot, your true demons are showing.

Dont worry, we still hate you ❤️

No, I dont want half hashed ideas as a war system. In theory it is a good system, however in game play it is absolutely unbalancing. The OP has made no effort to balance out the areas his idea would make unbalanced. So unfortunately it's not a suggestion I would support.

To tag on to this, it would be nice if we could input Nation IDs into the battle simulator and it auto fills for you rather than having to manually input all the data or better yet when you click battle simulator on the attack page it automatically fills in the data for that specific war.

Because the majority appreciate a quality written post, unlike this post of yours.

Good luck with the rebuild!

No. It's pretty simple, he still hasn't proven that anyone said the action of pre-empting was wrong. All he has proven is that a negotiable term says that the CB was outdated and because it was outdated it was invalid to use as a CB. That still doesn't show someone saying that pre-empting as an action was wrong. The evidence provided also only becomes a statement if you agree to it.

No.