Jump to content

Ayayay

VIP
  • Posts

    5115
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    80

Everything posted by Ayayay

  1. Well considering the fact that the Wahhabi movement could be severely weakened by removing them from power in Saudi Arabia and we still haven't done anything about it in the past few decades, yes, we are at fault. ISIS want's us to put boots on the ground to gain the support of the moderate Sunni. Needless to say we shouldn't. We should however try to get local powers to intervene. Supporting the Kurds is a risky maneuver since it could hurt our ally Turkey in a few years.
  2. I should set my stance on this issue since I've been less than serious most of the time. People should not be able to purchase anything above a pistol. You also need to pass a training course and be mentally stable. I also doubt a gun law would ever pass that would take away guns people already own. Especially considering the fact that you can still buy a handful of miniguns that were sold into the civilian market before the law went into place banning them. I have seen Iraq, it was far less violent when they didn't have guns under Saddam. I also find it laughable that you think we are anything like Iraq. 1. The militarization of the police force is a direct consequence of the war on terror. Changing gun ownership laws won't have an effect on it. 2. We are the leading weapons manufacture, we spend 40-45% of the entire world's military spending. But, again, changing gun ownership laws won't effect that because that is spent by the government on defense and has nothing to do with what a consumer spends. That guy in the video is pretty hypocritical, he denounces using children as political ammo but then turns around and uses his dead comrades as political ammo. Also, should congress take up arms and go overseas with the marines when they declare war? Really appears to be nothing but rhetoric which I tire of. I agree that the bill should not have been forced through but they did it before for same-sex marriage, where was the outrage when they gave men and women the right to marry their own sex? Or when they did the same for teacher evaluations? How dare they evaluate teachers!
  3. The problem is that there are 2 main arguments for the second amendment. 1. The idea is that an armed populace is harder to subjugate by a foreign invader (which, as the arsenal of Democracy, is not something we need worry about) 2. So we can fight against our own tyrannical government. (Which is again, ludicrous, how is a civilian supposed to fight against A-10's or Abrams?) Both of the arguments are outdated. We are the world leader in military strength, and with NATO behind us we can take on the rest of the world. Even if the worst came to pass and someone invaded us, we have over 5,000 nuclear warheads, you can extrapolate from there. A rebellion, on the other hand, would need to be supported by the American military to have any hope of success. Your "Barbie doll" AR-15 is, weather you want to admit it or not, not going to help you.
  4. BoC might have a more organized government
  5. She would have been unable to kill him without a full-auto uzi in her hands. Anyways, a 9 year old can shoot a Uzi but it is illegal for me to own a fully functional Abrams? I just want one, that's it. And maybe a Bradley as well. A F-22 would be nice too. Also a Predator Drone. I can't have any of those but that child is allowed to kill someone? Where's the justice?
  6. Zoe Quinn and Kotaku hypocrisy incoming?
  7. The page is working for me, although I already created my city a few days ago.
  8. You're just a great person to mention. The people that don't know you tend to not like you. The jokes just make themselves. (Also Lambadelta ragequit so I need a new person) Anyways, joke thread Job interview: "What's your greatest weakness?" "Honesty." "I don't think honesty is a weakness." "I don't give a !@#$ what you think."
  9. I meant stopped in that they stopped it themselves, same with CS.
  10. you can always just use an image from the net So anyone want to take bets on how long these guys will last? 10k that they go inactive/disband by the 7th.
  11. BLOC Party = Destroyed Poison Clan = Dismantled The Corn Shuckers = Stopped Porcelain Legion = Rolled into the ground Legacy Group = Stopped CoIN = Well, you know VoC = World War Alpha Other AA's that I can't be bothered to remember = gone You're not new or original. Raiders get destroyed, it is how it always has been and always will be. You are no different. The Bloc Party had what, 170+ members at their height? They are dead and gone, the only remnants are the ones that jumped ship during the UPN-BP war. How is your puny alliance of 16 members going to stand against anyone? True, you can destroy some of the tiny alliances but at what cost? Your nations won't prosper, you'll all probably leave in a few weeks anyways.
  12. Why didn't you put the link in the changelog as well?
  13. I thought you fixed that in Speedbeta?
  14. To be fair, that's more than what BLOC Party did.
  15. Ask your alliance for build guides
  16. Do you even middle mouse click bro? Or ctl+left click? If you don't know basic shortcuts you deserve wasting your time.
  17. Did someone call the Raider Killers? Dons UPN war flag
  18. No it isn't, you can open 2-3 tabs a second. The largest alliance can do it in 30 seconds tops.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.