brucemna

Who cares now about this semantic of validity 8 months later. Deal with today and move on. Seriously this argument is so repetitive it is like coalition A finding a excuse to keep this going.

I can understand ur concern for the rogue part but generally I think most AAs have a policy if rogues or unaligned raiders attack them they come up with a target list to deal with them on a individual basis. Maybe if someone rogues u can boot them off the AA they maybe on or using them both sides can agree they are fair game for anyone. That way they are not thinking for say if it is a TS (just a example dont overread or think) u can kick them off ur AA and attack them as well as members of the AA they attack until some kind of resolution comes .. though one could say slots can be filled but in that regard then ur AA would be responsible to produce battle logs to show effort in dealing with it.

Congrats and all ..

Makes sense ... as a matter of fact I think bonds at naps are good as they are almost a guarantee no one will make a stupid excuse for breaking them at will. As loans maybe should be a subsection of the peace agreement on a pending approval without holding peace I would think with a financial review of some kind with the borrowing AA

For and this is not on u personally I am surprised logs have not been posted on the counter to use in justification that our terms r to harsh. U r right we dont know what is in the private channels. As for what our leaders are saying we can say the same and have counter argued the perception u are trying to give. The only bull I have heard is public slander. Seriously though it is obvious to the word the PERCEPTION is different on both sides and no one should be called a liar. As mentioned before u have surrendered and yes negotiation involves rejection. Now as I have mentioned my perception is that 2 years there were reps paid by three alliances of 525 mil. At that time the precedent was set for any AA to go that road. There may have been reps even before that but am just working off memory at the moment of what is mentioned here. SO reps in this instance are justified as it is just a matter of perception on how much. Forward teo years maybe almost 3 and we also have to look at the state of the world then and length of war. Nations are bigger now .. as well axlonger war so damage and such is greater so pro rated the terms being suggested to u do not seem all bad given thought That does not mean u dont have the right to negotiate and with that in mind knowing ur perception and the hold for the past u way low balled ur counter I would think to 1/8 of the original terms which is just a guess. Mayne i am wrong maybe i am right but if u want this to end as u say u do then frick get on the ball and suck the road to get it done. One thing I am sure of is given the diplomatic state of the game right now u have lots of time to rebuild. If u say NPO is vulnerable to be able to build a sphere of strength then man the longer and more bull u guys keep posting will ruin ur window to even get there.

Why have I got the feeling that u love nascar racing as it seems u can only turn left and keep going in circles with the same one thought mind. Seriously I would think u would be coming with counter offers but then I guess u dont know how to turn right to the proper room u should be negotiating

One also has to look back to 2016 were I beleive the precedent of reps was made in we were to pay 525 mil to someone which if I recall was a shorter war in comparison. Though I haven't figured out the exact ratio and all it seems that this is not all that unreasonable agian I will bring up it has mostly been betrayed that NPO is receiving close to 50b. Which is not the case and as well even the question was tcw was not included when i blatantly see they are receiving reps though they may have to pay out something which may end up a wash . They point is that ur trying to make the 50b worse than it is. 2cyears later larger nations larger damage so maybe the ratios are not far off.

Your comments actually bring to life why there is no peace. If everyone acted like u do I would turn my back period as the tone u gi e is screw it why make a effort. Hence probably why the world is in the mess in the first place

Actually this makes more sense that the total was near50b .. as for tcw my understanding they were offered to come to the table with the last peace talks with the Panth and co .... but I guess with the new treaties signed is why they didnt come ... them treaties probably hung on them staying in. And just saying but it seems to me that NPO does not really benefit as much as certain peeps in coalition A are trying to make people beleive ... hmmmmm

How bout instead of these economic lessons AMD whinning the terms are to much there is this thing called negotiation and it does not involve using ur feet walking away from the table. Like this ... Coalition b ... we want 100b Coalition ..A ... hahahaha .. way to much .. how bout 50 .... A ... TOO LOW 90 B .. no way dumbass how 65 .. and we through in some ...... See get it hint hint ...good luck wah wahs

I miss Jack

Stop comparing different times from old age to new age. People have to change and adapt as time progresses.

Statistics do matter. They give u answers to what economic building u must do to make urself stronger. They matter when u go diplo to be able to find allies that are comparable and comparable to male sure in the world that u can protect and help each other where one may lack in one area or another. Stats do habe a place. First of in war there is never really a winner or loser cause everyone suffers in the physical and diplomatic sense. Where u win in one area ur going to lose in another. Point is it matters how we rebound amd move forward. Ur side in this case surrendered on condition of terms. Instead of showing the patience to find the terms u decided to walk away and then try a propaganda campaign. It almost worked until some found they were just gonna be meat shields and treated it seems as if they domt matter. Ur case for the propaganda trail would of been more stronger and successful if u had of took the terms and gotten the peace in november December and then start the war of words in the back channels . Now with what has happened with these alliances that found out ur intentions and thoughts about them u have taken 3 steps back. Now u want to try and say this is NPOs fault or BK or goons .. I wouldn't I would look back at the road u choose ..the words u used and maybe just maybe choose the right direction u intended when u surrendered. It dont matter what u say here in the owf cause quite frankly NPO membership are strong loyal and in this for the long haul and loyal to the leadership group we have to make the desicions they do.

Shhhhh ... that's to easy .. it gotta be more complicated and dramatic for some to understand

Naw we dont show mercy or nothing ... dam I agree with u these peace terms for these menaces are way to harsh. As what these terms stand for is giving the little guy a break that got sucked in by ur own gaslighting to use them instead of respecting them. Hmmm actually I hope the leaders of my side when they do discuss peace for u include reps for these people u used and insulted.

Congrats on the peace. Enjoy ur rebuild and fry some eggs on me

No just coalition A making fools of themselves. And the only gas I have is either in my car or butt thanks. Here is the meaning of gaslighting. Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which a person seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, making them question their own memory, perception, or sanity. the only gaslighting I have seen is coalition A posting leaks and trying to twist around the events of the past. All I have read is Coalition B answering the same thing over and over consistently but A tries to twist

Just out of curiosity how can other peoples ips show from Leo's devices? If I understand right then the person would have to be at Leo's location using the same internet company using Leo's phone or what not. And just asking not judging and how do u see the ips on what is posted as well or how did u find the ips ?

Escalating does not warrant peace. You are just dragging things out. Seriously coalition A had a chance for peace but instead decided they are sensitive people and backed away from talks amd decided to try amd win the war of words.

Yep.. and another 13 years beyond that..

Yes let's:) ...

Can u re quote the Roq quote ur talking about ? And then maybe u will answer ur own question or maybe even Roq will give a more detail answer

Agian read his words .. he said the post he made not Roq lol

Agian a spin lol .. and u wonder why we keep saying u guys keep spinning and assuming ... lol no where in tibbets post did he say or use the letters except TK lol and he mentioned he is giving his own opinion

And ur nation does not exist ?