Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brucemna

  1. Whatever.. here ur talking bout honesty and stuff but yet it is okay to disguise oneself and just invade the privacy of anyone.
  2. Well funny thing is you urself I think or someone else had said they didnt know whom he was .... but my question was not if he did or didnt but if they had the right too ... and it dont matter whom it is but regardless entering into a private domain and then copying stuff with a false identity then making it public is ?
  3. Aside from the bot then .. does any member of ur mod team have the right to go into private owned channels or forums were they are members only access ? Only a question and not a accusation ?
  4. Hmmm. "Didnt know who he was" ... public is a open channel... private is a channel that u need to be invite amd allowed in. Seems to me u know of alot of deception that occured
  5. Does if someone was in the private channel amd passed it on without permission
  6. I only mentioned alex does not own discord never said he went in it or whatever and I just asked a question ...
  7. One question... does alex or pnw own discord. As far as I know whomever owns the channel is that and discord is a separate entity which is chosen by people to do their communications. Unless stated public I beleive private channels are just that. If one enters that private channel and copies anything they are actually invading privacy is my thought if not given permission by the channel owner would I beleive be the rule of thumb.
  8. No one is blaming alex such as it is just the desicion amd timing. For the desicion part as he had at one time said mechanical and not mod issue then giving out bans seems excessive specialky cause someone does not want to say sorry on demand. However this is determined if cheating or bending of the rules if in actually cause of the vagueness of the rules in question it seems a ban is excessive. I have seen worse talk in the game channel to be honest by them that condem.
  9. Ah so u just threatened NPO with permanent war or roll lmao. Oh admin oh admin ....lmao .. naw couldn't be bothered. I am glad u can dictate what we can or cant do or should or should not. Just remember now these words u say may come back to haunt u. I dont know which u think u are that u can dictate to anyone what we are going to do or not as it is my understand only alex as the owner can say what u r saying. Geeesh for backroom trash talk like this we have members that r banned and yet u r still here .. go figure
  10. So ur saying that a couple of TEMP bans on some members mean we will be or should disband . In all honesty we have been mostly disliked since day one we changed from the old Vamguard to NPO. And as well I get the impression that u are not going to rest til we either do disband or delete. Hmmmm I think u are just proving maybe that the leadership is right on our side that months ago u all tried to set us up to beat us down to leave the game. Oh see I just twisted ur words .. or didnt I. Like i mentioned NPO will be just fine without without ROQ and co
  11. Agian who r u to tell NPO anything of what's best for them .. in other words dont worry bout NPO we will just be fine.
  12. Just out of curiosity... if these privatr logs before the investigation were there ... how do u know them and how did u read them to know what was apperently said.
  13. First and foremost the question was who do u think u r to be the one whom decides that we will disband .
  14. Seriously.. wonders how u know so much what Alex is doing and whom u are to demand anything.
  15. Actually I play at my pleasure not Alex's. Yes it is his intellectual product and yes he sets the rules and to his credit he does get players help him with ideas amd stuff at times which he has said NPO has helped with as a matter of fact. You actually missed the point though that if the mods and such are participants they are actually in a conflict of interest situation. As can actually be conceived as in his own words he has join in on the action and one can actually question if there was bias or not. No not accusing here just making the point. If I recall correctly when this game was first created the original moderation team where not allowed to participate at all. I can even admit to myself that if is a part of any of the moderation team I would be bias or have a favorable few of certain AA ol and such. Hence why I never entertiancthe thought. Dont make sense MV ... it dont sit well here. Remember all were paranoid we were trying to make players delete and bust alliances. If this was true we at least were warring on our own and not use admin to have to make severe desicions and do the dirty work they were not willing to do
  16. Hopefully it is the players game. I would think anyone the creates games thinks and let's the players play the game. Yes Alex owns the game but should never get involved with the game as long as he is the man making the desicions. Yes in his own words he does participate and regardless what side he may play or even if he plays both sides it is still a conflict of interest. Take this as u will as I sure u will twist it some way.
  17. It's okay I pass .. got better things to do Spoken like a true admin lapdog
  18. So everyone has not downloaded movies or music of certain sites or acquired however they are without permission from the right holders to such things or no one else has shared back and for pics or memes of any kind without the original publishers permission or tagged a news line of some kind..blah blah blah blah ...
  19. Omg forgive if real people are playing they game lol .. funny bout that too ... normally I am very inactive .. most of the time missing my log ins and so forth .. hell half the time ROQ has had to message me to sign in just to spend the money for my growth .. and yes what am I saying .. I myself am more a farm than anything .... sure I been a little a tive lately as work and life has been slow or was but basically I am a friggin farm by the way they are using it against us ..
  20. Was admins words not he would not of thought about until it was brought to his attention months before around november I believe ? And hi Stewie
  21. No .. there were no offences and seeing the arguement were it was a mechanical and not a model issue for one ... and the way it is described or reported supposedly it is all 1 issue of so called outside farming and so forth which I understand it as recruiting for the game. Personally if this method is walking the fine line of what u call farming them maybe less penalties are in order then redefine the rule to the recruiting process in game through mediation and committee of all peoples and not a select few. This went to far and the harshness has actually angered or caused people to delete due to coalitions complaints then enticing which is what coalition aWas supposedly trying to say what NPO and co was trying to do hence walking away from terms and surrendering. Seriously the hypocracy of the whole mess really really stands out to the one sidedness of the game. It gives the impression that if TS is not in control of the game and things are not done their way or they are losing let's get admin to do it for us. This time as u see from many posts the anger and resentments causing deletion and other ricpical events outwayed the war and its events.
  22. I prob read it wrong but it seems to me first offence was a nation reset and no ban til the second which is permanent. If there isxanything that actually was wrong. Trivial to make make a sound judgement? Wow just wow. I guess it is just trivial that we form a defense with no trial too
  23. So on other words everyone must play nice without some kind of "endgame" in mind and I dont mean making people delete or get banned. Sure even I can admit that some of my posts do sound off the wall and with that in mind I dont work real life and only have so much time to respond amd maybe points should be more defined. But since of course am dealing with feeble minded I guess understanding the gist of common English is not possible of a 2 year old. Next time I will just use the words good enemy and bad enemy and you will understand better I assume though probally a big assumption. Now as far as I am aware just cause we use are farms as more of a banking nation instead of meatshields a d because they are not as active as some people think and I mean think your side unjustly assumed agian we are cheating. Sure maybe we came up with a economic system that you dont like maybe cause you didnt have the brains to think it out we have to pay. Problem is since day one everyone has considered NPO the big bad bullies and cheating community from other realms and different times. We started NPO as a offshoot of a alliance called Vamguard and even under that name and because of the original members of that time the word was still shaky towards us .meaning no matter what we do it will always be wrong and un acceptable to some. You have small minds that instead of playing the game today under changing dynamics to move forward to create new events to make the game better with more people in it you went and cried foul when the ball actually hit the line.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.