Sheppard

That actually sounds more accurate

Absolute bullshit, no offense. Firstly I haven't liked GPA and I'm not the only one, didn't want to war them as I knew Rose would be implicated. I decided to do some spy ops, I got caught against GPA a few times, haven't heard a word from them. I don't know if I hit him or not when he was in GPA. As I said to Partisan privately I don't know how I ended up espionage his nation, messaged him right away and gave money right away. Didn't know he was demanding millions from my alliance in the forums, well played mate. Secondly no one, no one at all from TKR has contacted me. In fact I've contacted Oberstein myself and have had no reply. Secondly, your method is phoney. The range you used is attack range not spy range. Spy range is closer to the +150%, try using the right measurements. Thirdly you seem to know a lot about the spy ops against me which is plausible as I told Keegoz that I lost just about all my spies. I however never told him that anything besides lost spies. I haven't told anyone that my nation had a gather intelligence spy op against me. Therefore you are behind the 6+ spy attacks on me. Considering it is impossible for 1 or 2 nations to execute such spy attacks in such little time (less than 48 hours) it's fair to assume multiple TKR members are in on these attacks. What I find bizzare is that you claim I'm accused yet you don't contact me, further still you have spy op me even when you said you couldn't figure out why justifying that you had doubts it was me. These spy attacks happened against me before I posted here. As for why I went publicly, you didn't contact me, gave me no reason to think you would respond to me, which is correct as I still haven't received a response from Oberstein. You say you have a method as proof it was me, I've clearly shown you that you had faulty proof as the range used is wrong. I'm hoping publicly coming out that this guy/girl spying this TKR member will stop as I had been lead to believe that TKR thinks it's me and with that believed they were behind the attacks on me. I said to Partisan that I hoped that my accident didn't damage the relations between Rose and The Syndicate. I hope it hasn't damaged the image of Rose to Orbis. I don't particularly know much about TKR and our relation to them but it seems you have some learning to do from this ordeal yourself.

Hello all, to whom ever is spying on TKR member Oberstein. You have made your point of my mistake. Stop spying on him/her their alliance and mine believe it's me. So please kindly stop, again sorry to Partisan and those actions were mine and mine alone. For the million dollar question I was doing some spy ops on GPA, I'd like to clarify I have not done any spying over the last few days and will not be in the future unless I'm at war with them (obviously). Sorry for taking up peoples time cheers Sheppard.

Mmmmmm.....interesting, so why didn't Mensa join in this? From the way I see it t$ looked for a somewhat legitimate reason to attack alpha. Don't get me wrong they somewhat gave a legitimate reason but kinda boarder line really. Many people talk shit, Alpha did it while building up their military. To me t$ did more to roll alpha, think about it. Alpha and TEst have had tension for sometime. I think t$ used that to their advantage. TEst did majority of their work. Just a different perspective which I know that TEst, t$ and Mensa may not see. I've notice Mensa building up a lot the past week and continue to build up heaps day by day. Interesting how TEst said any alliance joining Alpha side, the peace treaty doesn't stand. Alpha saying publicly to it's allies not to step in. Yet Mensa continue to build up. Considering Mensa was a suppose rolling target alpha had, I wonder if Mensa is looking to join in when t$ decides it's had enough or earlier. Maybe Mensa is building up to attack another alliance.....Mmmmmm....your response has really had me thinking.

Just to clarify something, is the syndicate at war with Alpha because of the shit posting/bragging (whatever you wanna call it) or because Alpha didn't demilitarize?

St. Patricks Massacre, vast military build up over the last fortnight consistent with an alliance preparing to go to war (granted it can be classed as defense purposes although GPA wouldn't be #1 if they didn't build up, or at least as much). Then you have the defensive stance in people like me saying GPA isn't neutral. Now what I mean with that is that if GPA members are neutral then they wouldn't want to add fuel unnecessarily to people like me. In saying that they would want to defend and should but they need to do it in a less direct way or they can cause more tension (unknowingly). Basically if your a neutral you have to be careful with what you say and how you go about saying. That's why being neutral is hard.

Ease up mate, that was my first comment in this topic, in fact the first comment about GPA. Like sim city, play sim city (the game sim city) hahaha. Seriously though you gonna get people saying stuff like I have in a game that's titled politics and war if you play like that, deal with it. People can play the game as they wish, however they play they will get scrutiny just like if you were playing COD and you were camping. Not against the rules, it's a style of play but other players are going to scrutinize the way you play, pretty simple. To me GPA still haven't earned itself being neutral, not yet. I've been playing P&W longer than (That terrible game that is totally irrelevant and I shouldn't be bringing it up anyways), even then I play tournament. GPA have proven they weren't neutral before. All things aside who the hell cares if GPA are natural or not, this is a game, people want to get to number #1. Why can't anyone go to war with GPA then, since when does being neutral mean no alliance wide war. GPA growth in the last fortnight has gone up around 50,000 points (35-40%). Growing that fast is going to get attention. One has to think what plans GPA has with such growth, number of members have increased but not by much in the fortnight in comparison with score growth. I question the legitimacy of GPA claimed neutrality. It will be some time before that changes. I don't dictate how people should play, the style they play. I scrutinize the way some play with reasonable argument.

They don't hack, glitch or cause trouble. However in saying that they don't play the game. The game is politics and WAR. They can't be playing the game if their alliance doesn't at least war once No treaties, no politics. May as well call it sim city the way they play

So.....I guess we all just attack GPA

Moon Man When you raid you take a risk, might benefit you might not. Very simple, attack a nation applying to an alliance expect to be delt with. This doesn't mean you can't raid, you have to choose your raid targets carefully or face the consequences of raiding. Can't deal with it don't raid....or raid and get wrecked...which ever The choice is yours.

I would like to upgrade the following teams: Yemen Luzikastan BMZV's Athletici TLF Vanaheim Empire of the Hand The Flying flubbs The Orcas Sheppard of United Lantean will pay the full cost on behalf of FAOA Upgrading the by 600 points each Total cost $21,000,000

Revenge hits....months later....holding grudges is counter productive. Past is past it's what occurs in the present that you should be judged unless it's continuous and persistent (done it for weeks on end, basically hasn't learnt right from wrong). Anyway nations learn even alliances

Yeah mate

Country: Lantean Upgrade: +60 (140>200) Cost: $1,200,000