Bored now Leafing

COMMI'MURICA! I once heard of a policy about school funding revolving around the number of kids who graduate, but i can't remember the search terms used to find it or i would give some links to that too, however this situation would fit in well with trying to maximize the funding the school gets based off such a policy of more graduates more money.

http://www.pressdemocrat.com/news/4640349-181/rohnert-park-cotati-schools-rethink?page=0 http://www.prisonplanet.com/students-in-california-school-district-now-guaranteed-c-grades-for-doing-nothing.html http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/27/students-in-california-school-district-now-guaranteed-c-grades-for-doing-nothing/ The Fast track to illiteracy. Don't worry The union won't stand for this, sitting down is more comfortable.

If this man goes over the deep end it won't be a clean split between civilian auxiliaries and military elements, there are a lot of guys in play now that do not like him, but there are also units being/have been setup that owe loyalty to the leader and not the Constitution. You can't maintain civility can you? Well there is no reason to continue talking to such an abusive person. 13 Caecus is an example of someone raging so hard on the inside that it spills out into the real world and people like that can only hear there own rage and the rage of another, so they try to make other people rage so they don't have to hear the inner rage that is only silenced by the rage of another.

There were bigger secrets to be kept then Bill's extra marital activities and if he was going to be impeached it was thought better to have it be for some tabloid level nonsense instead of something that might endanger some backroom deal or another. If the constitution is so set-in-stone then why are the proper method of changing Constitutional laws not being used? We get this endless fearmongering about guns and hints at Australian/UK style gun laws instead of seeing a straight forward proposal to amend the constitution like during the prohibition era, they amended the constitution to ban alcohol then figured out how much of a bad idea it was and amended the constitution again to legalize it. Rome lasted so long because communication and travel was slower, when ideas and people move faster so do events. In this whole debate i have never said these things will happen i have been laying out a picture of what things might look like if a President carries out a threat to bypass congress and attacks a core ideal of America in this case the 2nd amendment.

Psychology is a very important factor still and until the military becomes 100% automated it will remain a large factor, when a solider is given an order to do bad things the ones of poor moral character will follow orders so long as they face zero risk, thous of higher moral character will protest so long as they are not burdened with ideas similar to that of original sin. If guns are banned and it is accepted it is the same as telling thous of high morals that they have done something wrong and if they think they have done something wrong they will stand down so long as they think they are in the wrong. If there is a true revolt and not a false start there will be a split in the military it won't be just the civil population vs the gov.

I had the feeling you were not actually reading/comprehending much if anything i was typing based on how you worded your first reply but i thought i would make sure by ADDRESSING YOUR BLOODY ARGUMENT in 3 or 4 different ways. This is why this and so many places are so boring people like you can't debate you only throw insults, worst of all you do not see your own failure to comprehend what is in front of you and as such you will not grow instead you will sit in your own verbal vitriol and find someone else to rant at and fight with. A heads up when you fling insults at people you harm your own arguments and people tend to form a bad opinion of you. I don't count the same set of insults twice. Caecus Insult count: 13

Government power tends to make people crazy or draw the functioning crazies to it. The higher up in government a person gets the more everyone will let them get away with things normally against the rules, this has two primary effects. First they become isolated more power equals more isolation, this of course makes them out of touch with regular life and unless they have a really good moral compass to guide them they often feel justified in breaking every rule there is. The second ties in with human nature, the nature of man is that of opportunity and the borrowed power of a nation is a very large opportunity and thus it makes the biggest temptation to abuse. To imagine that the person in charge of a nation brought to power by votes is somehow morally superior compared to thous who cast the votes is not rational. Rules are for moral people, rules are for the law abiding, rules mean nothing in a nation with immoral rulers or an immoral populace, for a nation of poor morals is a nation headed for dictatorship, or already there. Now here is the important part the exception to this is when the government of the nation engages in activity that demoralizes the moral/law abiding part of the populace, one big way to do that is to convince them to give up there arms willingly and to get them to surrender the right and duty of self-defense and rely completely on the will and wisdom of the select few to protect them and if the moral part of the populace can be convinced to do this then they will not stand in the way of an occupying army. As it stands the moral population of the US has not been completely demoralized, but then that is why The king goes around talking about the need for gun control and the media acts as loyal parrots to that agenda. Caecus Insult count: 13

Let's have a closer look at that statement you made not just the part you want to focus on. (1) Last time i checked auto aim was not a feature included on hand guns and rifles. The real reason you don't see mass stabbings is because knives and swords are not the popular weapon of choice for most suicidal maniacs. This talk of skill just sounds like something an FPS junky might spout off. (2) This part here is you siding with the logic that an armed populace is irrelevant. (3) This is you in another post completely reversing the course of your statement Consistency is important. (4) Further in that other post launching a plethora of thinly veiled insults and statements about your superiority. So is it better to be called out on your insults, or do you prefer to have them ignored by a quick bit of snark? The thing that makes the comparison of guns to melee weapons absurd is that if a person really wanted to kill and maim lots of people a knife would be more effective in a crowd then a gun cause unless your gun shoots holes in people it's 1 bullet 1 kill IF YOU CAN AIM, if you can't aim and you rely on spray and pray then the damage you do will be a lot lower plus the whole gun shot sound draws attention to you fast and that means anyone looking to stop you will be able to find you faster, compare this to a gun free situation get a knife and start cutting people in a crowd and the first sounds anyone can hear is the screams of the injured no need to aim and no need to reload leaves a lot more time for slicing, so unless everyone else is carrying a knife as well you likely are not going to get a knife in the back or any other form of resistance for some time. I shall also point out here that when media makes celebrities out of these killers it encourages more of them to do these kind of things, all this anti-gun hub-bub makes the media want to focus on guns.

Your calling me a troll yet the only thing you have managed to do is spew insults HMMMMMMMMMMM...

(1) Absurdity meets Absurdity (2) says the guy who suggested it would be easy to occupy a place with just a handful of tanks. (3) No counter argument? goody a freebie.

(1) Nuclear missiles are unique, in the sense that they are ranged ballistic explosive weapons capable of MIRV, and a person with no skill whatsoever could operate it. You want to prevent mass genocide, it's quite simple. Ban Nuclear missiles. The reason why you don't see mass Bombings is because it actually takes skill to use a Predator drone and kill a lot of people with it. Using a Nuclear missile and Targeting it at some nation does not take any skill whatsoever. (2) Psst hey bud why with all this modern tech do so many nations still have issues with gorilla warfare? simple, effective warfare has countless little parts that have to all work out or else things turn upside down in a hurry, and do you somehow imagine that 100% of the military is going to just abuse/stand by while other units abuse there own friends and families on the order of a wacko in the government even if that wacko is El Presidenta? Now lets thicken this mix thous armies have to get supplies for the men and there machines the more advanced the army the more it becomes dependent on solid supply lines and if everyone in the area refuses to supply your army then you have to bring everything you need in from other places and that leaves thous troops vulnerable and all it takes is one decent win to start capturing military equipment. The most important aspect to winning a siege is to get comfortable and it's hard to get comfortable with a population that hates your guts and is looking and waiting for any chance to slit your throat, so unless you plan to burn the whole place down get ready for countless very long nights. (3) As you seem to not be paying attention i will let you in on a secret the man that presently lays claim to the US throne is threatening to bypass congress (AKA act like a dictator) and use an executive order to ban guns, and that insane asylum escapee isn't the only one squawking as such, but thous i will let you try and find out about.

Hmm let's see, Climate change = Neo-feudalism, whining about the poor while he sits on giant piles of gold in the basement, and telling other nations to take in foreigners while having the most strict immigration and enforcement polices in his own nation. The well read Christians should be worried about this guy seeing as he, came in his own name and not in the name of the Christian lord, that's a big thing i hear something from the son of god himself?... well i don't read that stuff so i might be wrong about who said it, but it is still a big deal and all that. Flush the poop 2016 - I Chem trails!

Flush the poop 2016. I greet you Adama faithful of the church of climatology.

Civ games i own Civ 1 SNES and PC Most liked aspect War comes in many flavors Most disliked aspect Battleship vs Phalanx (you sunk my battleship) Civ 2 ToT MPGE PSX/PC Most liked aspect Near god like terraforming powers Most disliked aspect Late game eternal wars Civ 3 Most liked aspect The war engine Stacks of doom artillery and more Most disliked aspect Terra who? you wanna make this desert a little less dry? na bro what do you think this is civ 2? Civ 4 Most liked aspect MEGA CITIES!!! Most disliked aspect SSSSSSLLLLLOOOOOWWWWW TURNS... just give me a moment still waiting to process the last turn/ absurd population growth metrics. Civ games i have played but do not own Civ 5 Most liked aspect Ideological evolution Most disliked aspect Almost everything else Civ offshoots that i own Alpha Centari Most liked aspect Submersible flying aircraft carrier battleship... you sunk my everything, AKA custom units. Most disliked aspect Nothing to show me my total population, HOW MANY PEOPLE DO I HAVE!!!!! I MUST KNOW! Civ call to power Most liked aspect More technology more concepts more flavors of war MORE MORE MORE! Most disliked aspect Much to fast paced could not enjoy the various eras Civ call to power 2 Most liked aspect Troops drain population when being made/healing Most disliked aspect Max city size of...60!!!? what the... Civ offshoots have played but do not own Colonization and it's Remake on the civ 4 engine Most liked aspect Build build build build Most disliked aspect you have won the war of independence...game over

Left = Crazy government powered bureaucrats who want to control everyone else because they can't control themselves. Right = Crazy government powered corporate bureaucrats who want to control everyone else because they can't control themselves. Center = Crazy corporate bureaucrats who can't decide if they want to hand all power to the government in the open or hide it behind a facade of big business.