Jump to content

Jacob Knox

Members
  • Posts

    1205
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

Everything posted by Jacob Knox

  1. The difference this would provide is almost negligible enough to the point of being purely cosmetic. I'm not exactly against it, but it's kind of pointless if you ask me.
  2. "Crap, Nokia is at it again. Captain, could we please turn the plane around??"
  3. I couldn't make sense of half of what I just attempted to read (which, by some miracle, was roughly 2/3 of your post). Nobody insults my bby @MinesomeMC like that. When I get out of VM, I'm gonna get to your level and cremate your nation. 🤬
  4. I love that you're calling Sketchy out on this when Aurora has Main, FA, MA, and c20+ servers (technically there's also an IA server and the Goon Squad server). Though I will say as someone who can see the majority of channels in those servers, I appreciate having them separate lol. Especially when it is war time.
  5. Says the person posting stuff on the Forums about their test server alliance, which is arguably irrelevant.
  6. 1. You misspelled Immortal lol. 2. I'm a tad confused... are Dukes high gov or Immortals? Because usually with a graphic like this I see alliances put high gov on the left and mid gov on the right. 3. Make me MA high gov. You totally won't regret it.
  7. Stopped reading after you complained that the chance of blocking a nuke is "too small." Making the chance too high would simply make it pointless to launch nukes as they use 12 MAPs and a handful of resources. Why would anyone choose that option if there was a strong chance it would be blocked?
  8. Time to add a new column to the DB? 🤪😂
  9. I understood what you meant. You can have a max of 3 defensive wars and 6 offensive wars (last I checked). So you can lose a max of 3 wars as defender (3 days of beige in your suggestion) and 6 wars as attacker (2.5 days of beige in your suggestion). 3 * 3 + 6 * 2.5 = 24.
  10. I'm never really opposed to QoL changes like this, so I support this.
  11. By your proposition, someone can get up to 24 days of beige (3 defensive wars * 3 days each + 6 offensive wars * 2.5 days each). That's ludicrous, in my opinion.
  12. When you're so out of touch with the politics rn, but there is war and image is funny. Must laugh react.
  13. Shoot, say less. I now support Florida. Signed, irl Florida Man.
  14. I disagree. Realistically speaking, people don't generally like to be in a state of war, especially if it has negative consequences for then (i.e.: conscription in the Vietnam War).
  15. Stuff like this is why I like you lol. Keep it up.
  16. @Village seems like a really serious bug. Wanted to ping you in case you hadn't seen it yet.
  17. I didn't realize BS was a thing again. Interesting.
  18. You don't have to be in the alliance at the time the embargo was placed for it to affect you.
  19. I can guarantee this is nowhere near as important as you think it is. Also, I'm not sure if you can have a test server nation if your main server nation is banned. Clarification, @Alex?
  20. Some of these changes are going to be a headache to remember when I come out of VM. 😅 At least my job isn't MA now hahaha.
  21. This is a well known issue that I believe they're hoping to fix soon (or were hoping would be fixed with the rewrite). @Alex @Village
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.