Grave

Then please take all my money 💰

You're lacking the most basic literacy skills, as I said before, anything less than proving the posted screenshots are not real does nothing to challenge their 3rd CB

Not ready to die avenged sevenfold  .mp4

I was all in until I saw Epi's name Maybe the V2.0 will be better.

Maybe if you didn't go for individual actions from individual members and actually showed a per player alliance comparison (even with elite alliances like KT) your point would have any substance I'll wait. Intention doesn't mean anything with the logs posted Evh could've had a blitz planned out on their own and already sent out targets to all their members and these threats would still be considered them being forced to act and act against TI.

Come on James, the wording is just barely vague enough to not pass in a criminal court of law IRL , anyone who isn't biased can see the clear threats of aggression if they were not in A war, along with the multiple suggestions that it should be TI targeted Imo anything but directly challenging the legitimacy of these logs does nothing to disprove their points

Even if EVH only had sights on hitting TI , which I have no problem believing, I think the screenshots provided makes it very clear an option was put to them to go through with it ASAP or get rolled. While I will say The fact they didn't come to TI right away and look to attack TGH and co. together rather than listening is beyond my understanding . That doesn't ultimately change that they were forced to act .

Dayum well let me just apologize here real quick

Victoria vel mors, tamen non possumus mori

Oh yeah I'm sure me challenging a single member of an ally on fourms will certainly be so overwhelmingly bad that they'll forget the "atleast 6 months of beating down" You wanted to give them and rose

Bro had to find someone not even in their alliance or bloc to show someone doing good against me

Read my above comment, good communities also don't deserve to "be made to suffer for a long time" as was included in your leaked discussions that is what actually resulted in the other half of this war. I'd be looking at offensive wars declared per person instead of trying to find any little thing that I can use to make my opponents members look bad to make myself feel good, then cry about it in our discord when we don't take the bait like Daveth.

*bonk* get back in your cage Just cause you had nothing to lose when we were winning doesn't mean we didn't win .

Shows a 25% increase , called it "vastly"

This entire thread is a testament to the amount of work EVH puts into making it seem like number difference is the issue at play

Who ? Are you suggesting I can get the average member to declare >3 wars each time they leave beige I wish , y'all just bad

I haven't heard a single person in the entire game even mention the number difference in members , because really it's not relevant. Imo your effort to "change the landscape " could've really ended in a death sprial of 1 month ROIs, perma revenge cycles, and mass exoduses of good players because of continuous loss of progress over Long periods .

Isn't your alliances first complaint about Rose is that the didn't notify you that they didn't approve of this war for the same reasons I've been complaining about? I'll wait Edit: You're still in denial of the smell of your own crap And we declared more wars per player, after getting blitzed Without a milcom head So what does that say about y'all?

No qualms about the numbers advantage from our side, simply that you didn't allow us to get any kind of recuperation in between wars , which everyone but your ally (while a raiding alliance) has unofficially done since gw14 Outside of that I have nothing against what you said about TI I think the overall disapproval of your declaration should be well understood, I honestly don't know how you got it passed in gov or without your own members being pissed about it (although planed economy does help there ) I even told you that someone other than us is eventually going to do this same thing to you and that the people who matter agree with me, they just knew a lot more than me about the when and who and Stayed quiet to avoid suspicion

All we said is we wanted to be paid a little overtime pay and get breaks atleast once every 20 hour shift , but this will do

This is definitively one of the DOWs of all times.

Aged like milk

why not make all wars start with 0 MAP by default?

I think one the big issues that make it less desirable for alliances to try is that improvement is not recognized until you are a part of the top 3-5% of all alliances in these regards. In turn? it doesnt become a matter of being better , or even being good, it's about catching up to the ever-shifting bar that is held by those at the top. Which many see as a lost cause. And as someone who has arguably lived through that shift , it would kill most alliances (numerically) the game