Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Now i wish eclipse will involved to But @Veinstill busy to have c69 then going to war again 😭😭😭
  3. I have no strong feelings one way or another about the rest of this idiocracy, but I glad it created this post^
  4. Hello everyone, my name is Aursonsous, led by my leader Leonidas Vasquerez. I just wanted to intorduce myself as I have been playing the game for 3 days, and I want to know what are some tips you have for a newbie.
  5. TGH is in the wrong here end of story.
  6. Today
  7. Don’t tease me with a good time now. Imagine dictating another alliance and them not listening.
  8. waiting for you guys to fight so I can sneaky raid you 😗
  9. Lets me put this into perspective. Try this going to Orange. Let me know what TKR says. TKR didn't want IRON on Orange when it was around for the same reason.
  10. TGH’s deliberate actions to tank the gold color bonus are antagonistic and aimed at directly harming EVH’s economic interests. You can have your own opinion on the matter, but NAPs are not intended to offer protection while one party provokes the other. EVH has provided a clear and diplomatic path toward de-escalation by requesting that the alliances invited by TGH to tank the color bonus vacate the color.
  11. Waaaah waaah. Cry me a river, man. Those who live by the sword, die by it too. Man the !@#$ up.
  12. Hurts worse if anything, color wars are expensive and making fair deals is profitable for both parties.
  13. With respect, I think the "letter of the law" view on things is... incomprehensibly stupid. We keep testing the borders of what is an is not a violation, when it's fairly clear what it's intended to do, be it with nuke lotteries, spying, hiring mercenaries and over time, these have all made their way into what is really a stupid list of things that are on there. An NAP serves stop acts of aggression, deliberately sabotaging the other signatory's economy is just that.
  14. You can’t help yourself but throw punches when the other side has no chance, can you? It’s 287 vs 37 Are you still mad all those guys in THT don’t want to play in your team?
  15. If you’d like to, hurts you as much as it hurts me, same as Kastor here
  16. Okay. Can I tank your color, whatever it is, then?
  17. I mean Kastor is being Kastor; I don’t blame you for wanting to roll him. If EVH were to hit them after the NAP I’d say go for it. Maybe even root for you. However, there was no agreement made that an alliance can’t move to a new color bloc during the NAP. You could argue Kastor is being a duck about it sure, but it’s not an act of aggression. Hitting them would be almost as egregious as everything our dear friend Epi has done.
  18. Thanks for the opinion. Aside elaborating can't speak to it.
  19. You guys are so stupid with this PoV. I would consider EVH or Spectre or anyone hitting anyone in the NAP over color blocs to be in violation of the NAP
  20. Obviously the devs dropped the ball on this one. Clearly every AA needs its own unique color. So sad to see a basic function not be a thing in 2025.
  21. Missiles and nukes yay!!!! ... ... at least wait until the NAP expires, I mean come on.
  22. From DarkStar Well this isn't worth a DOW, so the TL;DR we are fighting alongside EVH in this conflict bcs it's ass what you are doing to harm us our groups in any sort or way, it feels almost as if you are obsessed with EVH so much you dream about them lol, I don't know what's so hard in minding ur own business and working on yourself and group to actually compete, and what you are doing is like having an argument with a pnw nerd on discord and he gets mad about it and wake up and find your spies assassinated, very much a coincidence, playing victim doesn't suit you and is pity you can do better. If you talk like a total a$$hole; and give these "whatever narrative suits you" responses, then don't get surprised when your ass gets beaten up and treaty the same way See you on the battlefield lads, Gold is ours
  23. Yesterday
  24. 1. THT didn’t attempt to tank Gold. There’s no evidence to support that. Just as I don’t entertain this idea that EVH went to Gold to spite TGH. You won’t hear me speak that narrative. 2. “The Baba Yaga” is protected by TGH, THT, and AA — because it offshores for all of them. You know Borg? He offshores for a lot of people, too. (And he also happens to be TGH IA just as I am TGH 2iC/Econ Head). Prots of TGH and AA were covered under the NAP. You can’t conveniently cross those out to create a narrative to justify attacking me — and then push the blame back on me when you get caught violating the term. Gaslighting at its finest. 3. I haven’t been leading THT since the GW34 conflict began. I was in the process before THT got attacked of transitioning to TGH. That’s why I signed the GW34 NAP under TGH, and it’s why THT wasn’t part of the negotiations or a signatory of the NAP. Same reason as I have no control of THT’s FA, nor any visibility to their FA embassies on their own server or any other alliance’s server. That’s all handled by House Reyne. Just because I quietly took my leave and didn’t wish to attract attention doesn’t mean it should be used to discredit me several months later.
  25. Our decision to move first, had nothing to do with you. We moved to Gold because Olive was not ideal, and it's literally GOLD. That's it. Stop trying to spin, lmao.
  26. I'm happy to see you admitting that you did it to spite us. Glad we got that out of the way.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.