Rageproject

As we reach a milestone and reflect upon 365 days from inception to its present evolution, The High Table wishes to extend a toast to all. Join us in celebrating and uniting all peoples of Orbis from the lonely one-nation nano, to the 200-nation mega-macro, to the tax farms that have perished, and the micro dreams that are yet to become a reality. Raise your glass of our finest Red Wine — Glory to The High Table! And may John Wick have mercy on those nations receiving personalized invitations from our devout members to join them in celebration.

Guys, this isn’t about all of us anymore. This is about the new players. Don’t forget that.

Related color quality of life issue… Can we fix the problem with having to toggle from gray to an actual color? Currently, a gray nation has to go into Edit Nation page, select another color, and then reselect the color they want, and save the page. Eliminate the ability to ”hide in gray” and it should automatically revert a nation to its prior color upon login. Beige players move to gray as usual, until they login and it reverts to their prior color. If it’s meant for inactivity, then let’s keep it strictly for inactivity. Let players and alliances fight about taxes amongst themselves instead of exploiting what feels like a glitch in the game. Plus, this is a huge frustration for players who think they fixed colors it and didn’t, and it draws active players to be attacked and mistaken as inactive constantly.

Isn’t one alliance with 36 inactive members and constantly suspected multi nations already enough for your group?

I don’t disagree with you on much of this. But it is why I feel the game doesn’t put in place the mechanisms to create any sort of balance — like capping out alliance membership numbers, or having a tiering safeguard that enables these mega alliances and nanos to exist and not compete in the same arena. If an alliance is not Top 50-60 at this point, it’s not exactly relevant. And like Epi points out, the cut off for any relevancy is going to continue to shrink based on sheer exponential growth of the top tier alliances because that’s what the mechanics allow for. This is all relevant to this topic of Atlas, because here’s an example of a micro that has (sorry Mac) become quickly declining in status in recent months for both internal and external factors.

My condolences

Update…

20+. Rageproject

You should see how bad it looks now.

I look forward to my phone now trying to autocorrect “two” to “TWO” all the time. Thanks a lot.

Oh, hey… I know these guys! Good luck.

You praise yourself for making BS successful… but blame an entire community when you fail despite your own actions along the way. Propaganda until the end. That said… Best of luck in whatever world you inhabit outside of P&W. Sincerely.

Honestly one thing that should be considered is the barrier to entry on Missiles and Nukes. You should have to reach a certain city tier before being capable. And probably have basic projects. I agree with the fact it’s too easy to just lob missiles/nukes simply to be disruptive.

You can’t argue with Professor Steiner

Happened to notice this too… confirmed multi