Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Today
  2. They're also a discordless community, so its more of a refugee haven lol
  3. Yesterday
  4. Why thank you good sir! Aim to please! But I think TSC is doing better than what you are arguing. The machine may have started running a bit later than expected, but I think it is running well now. We are raking net positives for the past few days.
  5. I hope the next war TGH goes in has completely even numbers dude... There was like a 2% difference at the beginning in the mid-tier and like a 15% advantage in the high mid-tier for WELP when comparing effective military strength by the score ranges. One of the closest wars in Orbis history and probably the closest war that's going to happen in the next 2 years... Dogpile 🤣
  6. I'm surprised LoD isn't lower. Have you ever talked to hamer? Dude is a genius. /sarcasm Plus LoD is just performing bad, lol. DB has performed a lot better than it's history. I'm not much of a stickler on selling infra, just as long as members show up to fight. Shows a unified front if their members sell Infra for better military standing while fighting, so that's honestly impressive there. They did a complete 180 turnaround here, even if it's in a dogpile. Hopefully they learn from this for future conflicts. TI is terrible. Even with the knowledge of the war coming up, they still didn't show up. How do you fumble that? And holy hell, look at some of their nations bleeding loot. Why haven't they changed their taxes to stop the bleeding if their nations aren't going to fight? Grumpy is very disappointing. I could rant on about them. They had a promising showing initially, but fumbled it because they didn't stick around to counter. Could've kept that upper tier if they persisted, but nope. Just tapped right on out mostly. What's the point of a 0 tax alliance if you're not going to fight for it? They've pretty much gave up the upper/whale tier fight to their rivals, and with other AAs growing their own whale tier now - Grumpy will be left in the dust sooner or later. WAP was doing pretty good initially, but they could've declared more wars. Granted they're on the dogpile side, so maybe it was tough for them to snatch up slots. TKR, as usual, doing alright given they're having to carry their side and fight against another dogpile. Plus it seems they're target #1 due to their ability to fight. Better to focus on pinning them down since their allies aren't doing much. TSC could do much better, but only a handful of them are trying to put up a fight. The rest seemed to have given up. I see you @Ronjoy Tehmina, you're doing a damn good job there sir. You'd think with some of these AAs chest puffing over their Protectorates or just handling FA, they'd fight way better in a war or at least put in an attempt. A lot of AAs here are really subpar, even on the dogpile side.
  7. Not as it sits currently. I don't believe they have much (if any) influence. At first glance, they have 2 people listed as gov in-game with 109 members. Typically you see this when the gov is weak, or there isn't a lot of trust between leadership and the rest of the staff. The AA is also running 0% Taxes - as a non-raiding AA, this is a bold move that will likely not pan out in their benefit. 10% nations on grey/the AA appears to be a favorite raid target for pirates. Maybe it's a fun community, but they currently have no impact on the political landscape. Maybe in time that will change. Good luck to you and your group!
  8. Personally I support an increase in nuke cost (not sure about double but maybe a 25%-50% resources increase), I think missiles should stay the same. Missiles have become less effective, and it wouldn't be bad for them to be seen as a more cheap but effective option to deal damage.
  9. What font is the PnW logo? Or is it custom made?
  10. This is an updated & maintained version of the original post from 2015 ALLIANCE DIRECTORY Alliances are sorted alphabetically. Updated on the first of every month. =+=+=+= Antarctica Alliance Discordless Apocalypse Knights Discord Arkham Asylum Discord Arrgh Discord Black Knights (BK) Discord Blackwater Discord BROTHERHOOD FAMILY (BroFam) Discord Camelot (CAM) Discord Church Of Atom (CoA) Discord Dark Brotherhood (DB) Discord Eclipse Discord Empire of the Romans (EotR) Discord Event Horizon (EVH) Discord Federated States of Orbis (FSO) Discord Global Alliance & Treaty Organization (GATO) Discord Grumpy Old Bastards (Grumpy) Discord Guardian Discord House Stark (HS) Discord Knights Templar (KT) Discord Legion Of Dawn (LoD) Discord Magister Mortalis Discord Man I Love Frogs (MILF) Discord Mayhem Discord Moms Friendly Robot Company Discord Name Withheld Discord Oblivion Discord Pokimans Discord Rose Discord Singularity (SIN) Discord The Commonwealth (tCW) Discord The Enterprise (tE) Discord The Fighting Pacifists (TFP) Discord The Foundation Discord The Golden Horde (TGH) Discord The High Table (THT) Discord The Immortals (TI) Discord The Knights Radiant (TKR) Discord The Legion Discord The Lost Mines (TLM) Discord The Sword Coast (TSC) Discord The Syndicate (t$) Discord Unforgiven Legion Discord United Purple Nations (UPN) Discord United Socialist Nations Discord United Ummah Discord Vault-Tec Discord Weaponized Assault Penguins (WAP) Discord Weebunism Discord World Task Force (WTF) Discord Yarr Discord
  11. Our stats would look better with MM included, but told Hamer we'd be ahead within another round.
  12. Who even is this guy

    1. Ronjoy Tehmina

      Ronjoy Tehmina

      lmao fr though 

  13. Wanting to unsubscribe from life.

  14. No, not really. Though I will say they've shown relatively respectable growth and even some reformation (as far as I know) since the days of when I thought they would probably die quickly.
  15. unironically yes, if you think it's a zero cost endeavor you can also have zero rebuild cost by never rebuilding, effectively taking zero damage. If that doesn't explain what I'm trying to convey then I guess I am lost as to what even your point is. Attacker bears virtually zero cost by having virtually no income, if that's acceptable to you then I can also argue the defender can simply not rebuild to have same virtually zero cost of eating a nuke. Logic checks out.
  16. @Kevanovia Does Antarctica have any political power?
  17. Two nukes built per day means two targets can be nuked using two separate wars, since each war gets its own MAPs. Go learn how to war And again, if each nuke does one full day's income worth of damage then that completely nullifies the targets' growth, at virtually zero cost to the attacker. And your counter argument is literally that one simply shouldn't have infra so it can't be nuked? Mate, you can't claim that turretting is underpowered when by your own arguments it demonstrably isn't. I'm not saying it's OP, but you're certainly making a good case that it is.
  18. I'm not completely sure, since haven't paid to renew card for many years. However head shop says its the good stuff, with whatever cannabinoids. Do expect it fully legal soon. Radidation has already killed my food production, should see if food can be driven up in cost.
  19. one per day - takes 12 MAPs. 2 will take 2 people In any case, that in itself is no argument, debate is not about whether someone should be losing a day's income or not because people do, very often and much more than a day's income. It was about the cost to inflict that damage which I have already said (proved?) is quite high already if the attacker wants to be in a position to take practically no losses. Attacker not losing anything is because he didn't have anything to begin with, it's an illusion, you can also zero your losses by not having infra, at which point I may argue to buff the nukes since they're not doing any damage anymore and that argument would still make more sense than whatever is being discussed here. Even if I were to consider your "it's too op to be able to kill one day's income" it simply does not happen often enough to be worth any concern, the top 100 most nuked nations, the most extreme example you could possibly take, ate a nuke every 21.73 days on an average. Most of which are eaten during GWs so the actual impact is even lower, and again this is for the 100 most nuked nations, for the average guy it's non existent. If you're interested in numbers: most frequently nuked guy is ironically a pirate. maybe later I'll delve further into numbers.
  20. And I thought I was the one who pushed propaganda! 10/10
  21. Last week
  22. You know I think I'm just going to plop this here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continent
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.