Popular Post Tenages Posted January 6, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted January 6, 2015 Honestly I find this to be as pointless as the idea to stop counting inactives in the alliance score rankings. There's a point of inactivity at which it's been decided that it's no longer worth keeping the nations alive, and they're deleted. It's been set at 30 days. Until they get deleted, they're still nations, and still in whatever alliance has chosen to accept them. They exist, and they're an alliance member. They should still have taxes collected, they should still be counted in rankings, etc and so forth. If they haven't been inactive long enough to get deleted, there's no reason they should arbitrarily no longer be taxed, or booted out of their alliance, or whatever. Let alliances choose to handle their own members however they want. If the 30 day timer for deletion is too long, then reduce it. Don't create subtimers that serve no purpose other than to satisfy a group of players who don't like inactives, want to raid them, and don't want to see alliances who aren't as strict with inactives as they are profit off of the game tax system. If alliances want to use inactives as a tax farm, as I see it, it's a completely legitimate tactic. It's got it's own set of disadvantages it causes, and the response to it shouldn't be to legislate it out of the game because some players don't like it. As long as players haven't been inactive long enough to be deleted, they should be treated like the other nations in the game. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
last187 Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 right soo if we really wanna make a distinction between active and not why not let us adjust tax rates for all activity levels : like oo you are red as a punishment you will pay more taxes or oo you are very active here have a tax cut Quote Going for top nation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoS Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 right soo if we really wanna make a distinction between active and not why not let us adjust tax rates for all activity levels : like oo you are red as a punishment you will pay more taxes or oo you are very active here have a tax cut Based on my activity that would be acceptable - but, no. That's too much exploit. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashland Posted January 6, 2015 Share Posted January 6, 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cgbZqR2AGI Quote ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [10:47] you used to be the voice of irc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WISD0MTREE Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 right soo if we really wanna make a distinction between active and not why not let us adjust tax rates for all activity levels : like oo you are red as a punishment you will pay more taxes or oo you are very active here have a tax cut No. "Hello! You are inactive. I hope you like your 100% tax." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.