ELPINCHAZO Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 please change Bonus = ( Nations on Color * 2 ) / ( (All Nations Not on Gray) + ( Alliances on Color ^ 2 * 200 )) to Bonus = ( Nations on Color * 2 ) / ( (All Nations Not on Gray or Beige) + ( Alliances on Color ^ 2 * 200 )) There is no reason that beige nations should be considered in the calculation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashland Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 (edited) I do actually agree with this. Which is basically a glowing endorsement coming from me. Edited January 1, 2015 by Ashland 2 Quote ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [10:47] you used to be the voice of irc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jodo Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 Sold. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Snow Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 no. just. no. When people are beiged during war it adds an extra part of defeat into alliance-wide wars. not only that but it adds extra challenges into the game rather than just a hand out. be thankful we even get stock bonuses to begin with Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grillick Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 I disagree with this suggestion. See below for why: Oh, and if you were asking "why" because you wanted a justification, rather than a snarky reply, the answer is "because it is intended to capture all active nations, and the only way to move to grey is inactivity." 1 Quote "It's hard to be a team player when you're omnipotent." - Q Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Alex Posted January 1, 2015 Administrators Share Posted January 1, 2015 When alliances are fighting, under the current system, you are going to suffer a small penalty for each one of your members that gets knocked off of your color to beige. I think that makes wars a little bit more fun, and things ought to stay the same. 1 Quote Is there a bug? Report It | Not understanding game mechanics? Ask About It | Got a good idea? Suggest ItForums Rules | Game Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ELPINCHAZO Posted January 1, 2015 Author Share Posted January 1, 2015 no. just. no. When people are beiged during war it adds an extra part of defeat into alliance-wide wars. not only that but it adds extra challenges into the game rather than just a hand out. be thankful we even get stock bonuses to begin with You apparently didn't see the numbers when I ran them,they weren't higher. It actually becomes LESS of a handout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur James Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 please change Bonus = ( Nations on Color * 2 ) / ( (All Nations Not on Gray) + ( Alliances on Color ^ 2 * 200 )) to Bonus = ( Nations on Color * 2 ) / ( (All Nations Not on Gray or Beige) + ( Alliances on Color ^ 2 * 200 )) There is no reason that beige nations should be considered in the calculation Please change it into: Bonus = Nation colour *2/(alliance on colour^2*200)+ (All nation not on Gray and not below 300) plus 1% extra bonus if all can keep the colour unchanged with more than N days like 10, 20, 30 days or 1,2,3 weeks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geronimo Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 (edited) Please change it into: Bonus = Nation colour *2/(alliance on colour^2*200)+ (All nation not on Gray and not below 300) plus 1% extra bonus if all can keep the colour unchanged with more than N days like 10, 20, 30 days or 1,2,3 weeks. I'm fully support this idea. Edited January 1, 2015 by Luckynako Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.