Jump to content

Post your war reports - End of War Damage Numbers!


Placentica
 Share

Recommended Posts

I've been following the wars of the leaderboard and it makes me think more than ever that Missiles are lame and they ruin tactics, it will suck if war in PW descends into just throwing missiles at each other which you can basically do nothing to defend against. Big battles on land and the air/sea will become irrelevant with missiles/nukes...

It's the natural progression of war - people use the most effective options in war.

 

P.S. There is a project that has a chance at thwarting missiles, which is bound to become commonplace one day, too.

 

I'll post war stats from my wars when peace is declared. Hopefully I'll be able to get up to at least a dozen wars by then! ^_^

Edited by Kurdanak
xzhPlEh.png?1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the natural progression of war - people use the most effective options in war.

 

P.S. There is a project that has a chance at thwarting missiles, which is bound to become commonplace one day, too.

 

I'll post war stats from my wars when peace is declared. Hopefully I'll be able to get up to at least a dozen wars by then! ^_^

Really, you're pulling the "realism" argument? I'm just saying that war with soldiers and tanks attacking, aircraft bombing, ships blockading, is INTERESTING. Throwing missiles and nukes at each other to see who has the biggest pile of rubble left when it's over - is lame, even if it is realistic.

Democratic Republic of Koprivshtitsa (DRK; Bulgarian: Demokraticheska republika Koprivshtitsa)

Communist Party of Koprivshtitsa (CPK; Komunisticheska partiya na Koprivshtitsa (KPK))

Member-state of the Green Protection Agency

 

~Peace and Fraternity Between All Nations~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really, you're pulling the "realism" argument? I'm just saying that war with soldiers and tanks attacking, aircraft bombing, ships blockading, is INTERESTING. Throwing missiles and nukes at each other to see who has the biggest pile of rubble left when it's over - is lame, even if it is realistic.

Of course the other things are done too, if it makes sense strategically. If I have missiles, I will use them. Maybe alone or in combination with other weapons. I am not going to do GAs if I lack troops. Similarly I am not going to conduct air attacks if the enemy outnumbers me in aircrafts and I haven't halved his air strength yet. The goal is to do damage.

 

And really, war is only truly interesting for both fighters when they are at somewhat equal levels.

Edited by Niklaus

Blood of a king. Heart of a lion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm jealous of all you guys with the cash loot.  My only prize was the extreme butthurt I caused.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really, you're pulling the "realism" argument? I'm just saying that war with soldiers and tanks attacking, aircraft bombing, ships blockading, is INTERESTING. Throwing missiles and nukes at each other to see who has the biggest pile of rubble left when it's over - is lame, even if it is realistic.

TIL that dealing the most damage that you can to an enemy, causing millions in damage, is apparently lame. I'm not pulling the "realism" argument, I'm pulling the "logical" argument. Try it sometime. â”( ̄ー ̄)┌ Edited by Kurdanak
xzhPlEh.png?1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.