Jump to content
Deulos

Bank Hiding/Changing name of Alliance

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Add this to top 10 dumbest reports of the year.

Edited by Denison
Warned for defending myself by calling it a dumb report, feels communism man.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Deulos said:

This nation changed the name of his alliance right after the war was declared to avoid people stealing the cash if they won a war. Obvious bank hiding technique.

https://politicsandwar.com//nation/id=163127

 

I’m going to provide evidence here.

 

This is clearly a weak attempt to use moderation to get bank loot, as anyone with a pair of eyes can see that a new alliance was created.

 

But that does raise the question: would changing names to avoid being loot even be punishable?

936B66B0-6CFB-430B-9008-8FC46F5F5066.png

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is being reported is not against the rules and so this report should be dismissed.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, CandyShi said:

This is clearly a weak attempt to use moderation to get bank loot, as anyone with a pair of eyes can see that a new alliance was created.

I'm sure you already knew that  Alex did discuss alliance bank hiding using a variety of methods and his ways of stopping it. Also I'm not sure where you get "using moderation to get bank loot" from. He's avoiding his bank being looted by creating and leaving alliances everytime he feels he'll lose a war. I feel your evidence suggests that he is doing this.

 

11 hours ago, Thalmor said:

What is being reported is not against the rules and so this report should be dismissed.

 

I feel like the above is against the rules so by game policy I have reported it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Deulos said:

Alex did discuss alliance bank hiding using a variety of methods and his ways of stopping it.

I seem to recall Alex discussing how it was a common tactic, which implies that it’s legal otherwise they would have already been banned.

 

You seem to be heavily cherry picking here in the hopes that you’ll get a cut of the loot.

(again, correcting his report here no ban pls)

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Deulos said:

I'm sure you already knew that  Alex did discuss alliance bank hiding using a variety of methods and his ways of stopping it. Also I'm not sure where you get "using moderation to get bank loot" from. He's avoiding his bank being looted by creating and leaving alliances everytime he feels he'll lose a war. I feel your evidence suggests that he is doing this.

 

I feel like the above is against the rules so by game policy I have reported it.

It does not matter how you feel. What matters is what the rules state. There is no rule against 'bouncing' banks between alliances to avoid losing loot. This has been a common practice across dozens of alliances for years. Not once as Alex ever said it was against the rules nor taken action against it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Thalmor said:

It does not matter how you feel. What matters is what the rules state. There is no rule against 'bouncing' banks between alliances to avoid losing loot. This has been a common practice across dozens of alliances for years. Not once as Alex ever said it was against the rules nor taken action against it.

The rules state if you feel like a game rule or suspicious actions are occurring it is our duty to report it.

Just because everyone does it, doesn't make it ethical. I'll let Alex decide which action to take though.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doing an actual alliance name change (which you pay for with Credits) won't prevent bank looting.

Deleting your alliance and creating a new one is not against the rules. Transfer of money / resources this way can also be prevented with a blockade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Alex said:

Doing an actual alliance name change (which you pay for with Credits) won't prevent bank looting.

Deleting your alliance and creating a new one is not against the rules. Transfer of money / resources this way can also be prevented with a blockade.

Well I posted this in tech support and someone told me that I didn't get the alliance bank loot because that alliance no longer existed. I looked and Denison deleted the alliance and created a new one right before he was beiged. So it's either a bug or some sort of exploit Denison used to cause his alliance bank not be looted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Deulos said:

Well I posted this in tech support and someone told me that I didn't get the alliance bank loot because that alliance no longer existed. I looked and Denison deleted the alliance and created a new one right before he was beiged. So it's either a bug or some sort of exploit Denison used to cause his alliance bank not be looted.

You didn't get alliance loot because the alliance you were trying to loot (the one the nation was in at the start of the war) no longer existed, therefore there was nothing to loot.

Deleting an alliance and creating a new one isn't against the rules. You might question the ethics of the tactic, but it is a common one. But, it can be prevented with blockades.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Alex said:

You didn't get alliance loot because the alliance you were trying to loot (the one the nation was in at the start of the war) no longer existed, therefore there was nothing to loot.

Deleting an alliance and creating a new one isn't against the rules. You might question the ethics of the tactic, but it is a common one. But, it can be prevented with blockades.

Wow, interesting...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Elijah Mikaelson
3 hours ago, Alex said:

You didn't get alliance loot because the alliance you were trying to loot (the one the nation was in at the start of the war) no longer existed, therefore there was nothing to loot.

Deleting an alliance and creating a new one isn't against the rules. You might question the ethics of the tactic, but it is a common one. But, it can be prevented with blockades.

Sorry for posting here and i am sure i will get a warning in time however Bank to bank is not blocked by a bloackade, most would have someone else setup the offshore send the stuff bank to bank and then join the new alliance

I personally think its about time a nation thats blockaded can not send rrs or cash from the bank 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.