Prefonteen Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 Just now, John Q Listener said: Actually it's more about you changing your tune to suit your own ends, but good to finally have you clear that up. You're the least perceptive GOON i've met thusfar. That includes Milton. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Q Listener Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 17 minutes ago, Prefonteen said: You're the least perceptive GOON i've met thusfar. That includes Milton. Very telling that you resort to personal attacks, but I guess that's all you have left? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComradeMilton Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 3 hours ago, Prefonteen said: You seem to be slow on the uptake. Let's try again: - I speak for t$ - I represent t$ and its allies (along with others) - I represent coalition A (along with others) You don't represent CoA to CoB as tS as far as CoB is concerned is not a part of CoB. You're separately agreed and mentioned you accepted that and had been seeking that separate peace, then expressed frustration at what you perceived as being ignored. If you need to inform CoB, who are probably at least friendly, what they need for peace, it's to return to the peace server and begin work on the second term. 3 hours ago, Prefonteen said: I hope this helped. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Q Listener Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 1 hour ago, ComradeMilton said: You don't represent CoA to CoB as tS as far as CoB is concerned is not a part of CoB. You're separately agreed and mentioned you accepted that and had been seeking that separate peace, then expressed frustration at what you perceived as being ignored. If you need to inform CoB, who are probably at least friendly, what they need for peace, it's to return to the peace server and begin work on the second term. This is exactly what I was questioning before. I thought I was taking crazy pills here! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 9 hours ago, John Q Listener said: Very telling that you resort to personal attacks, but I guess that's all you have left? Just figured i'd throw a curveball to break the monotony of bashing my head into your weaponized ignorance, friend! 6 hours ago, ComradeMilton said: You don't represent CoA to CoB as tS as far as CoB is concerned is not a part of CoB. You're separately agreed and mentioned you accepted that and had been seeking that separate peace, then expressed frustration at what you perceived as being ignored. If you need to inform CoB, who are probably at least friendly, what they need for peace, it's to return to the peace server and begin work on the second term. 5 hours ago, John Q Listener said: This is exactly what I was questioning before. I thought I was taking crazy pills here! Coalition B does not have the power or leverage to dictate what coalition A alliances identify themselves as. If the constituents of coalition A present themselves as unified, then for all intends and purposes they are. To argue otherwise is a matter of pedantic semantics. What coalition B can affect, is how the peace of coalition A is approached. Due to the balance of power you can push for or force a split negotiation as you have. While we may accept that (as we have in November), it still does nothing to alter the status of coalition A as a unified coalition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sval Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 We are part of Coalition A. Quote <~Sval[OWR]> I am your father.<+Curufinwe> Can confirm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Q Listener Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 1 hour ago, Prefonteen said: Just figured i'd throw a curveball to break the monotony of bashing my head into your weaponized ignorance, friend! Coalition B does not have the power or leverage to dictate what coalition A alliances identify themselves as. If the constituents of coalition A present themselves as unified, then for all intends and purposes they are. To argue otherwise is a matter of pedantic semantics. What coalition B can affect, is how the peace of coalition A is approached. Due to the balance of power you can push for or force a split negotiation as you have. While we may accept that (as we have in November), it still does nothing to alter the status of coalition A as a unified coalition. Just would like to throw out that it's almost like you didn't read what Comrade Milton posted at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avakael Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 1 hour ago, John Q Listener said: Just would like to throw out that it's almost like you didn't read what Comrade Milton posted at all. We stopped bothering to read what Comrade Milton was posting somewhere in late 2016. It's not really a y'all thing. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComradeMilton Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 14 hours ago, Prefonteen said: Coalition B does not have the power or leverage to dictate what coalition A alliances identify themselves as. If the constituents of coalition A present themselves as unified, then for all intends and purposes they are. To argue otherwise is a matter of pedantic semantics. What coalition B can affect, is how the peace of coalition A is approached. Due to the balance of power you can push for or force a split negotiation as you have. While we may accept that (as we have in November), it still does nothing to alter the status of coalition A as a unified coalition. You said what I said except in longer format. 11 hours ago, Avakael said: We stopped bothering to read what Comrade Milton was posting somewhere in late 2016. It's not really a y'all thing. Pity. Agreeing with me in very thorough detail is more effort than just noticing we agree and moving on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTI Posted December 16, 2019 Author Share Posted December 16, 2019 Who are the leaders of Coalition A and B? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.