Speaker Faris Wheeler Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Today, The Kingdom of Hyrule has enacted a Law banning the sale and consumption of Genetically Modified Plants and Animals. Being caught in the practice is a fine of 500 Rupees and the removal of farming licences. "This is considered animal cruelty" said Queen Zelda. "Not only it is cruel for animals, it is unhealthy for the people of the Kingdom and there is no need for it". This comes as a study from the Hyrule Institute of Technology Health Department show that consumption of Genetically Modified foods can cause birth defects, autism, and other instances. 3 Quote Peace will never be accomplished without war, but war cannot happen without peace.... or something like that idk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimitri Valko Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Congratulations! They are also banned here in Ryas. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince Hunter of Bavaria Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 We have enacted this law in the DeustchReich as well 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikhan Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 In Chernigov, GMO's are legal, as long as they are thoroughly tested before being put on the market. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Techcraft2 Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 We have already embraced the GMO as the superior food. Surely, others can say the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chapsie Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 (edited) NSF official: Tests in Nova Scotia contradict the paranoid belief that genetically modified food is unhealthy. It provides the plant further resilience and is able to feed more people. Levels of any negative aliment have not been traced to GMO's and furthermore the NSF looks down upon governments in which so easily throw away scientific progress due to their paranoid beliefs. Conservative belief in the halt of change and the fear of the future is what really impedes the path of inquiry. Stand not in the path of inquiry. “Upon this first, and in one sense this sole, rule of reason, that in order to learn you must desire to learn, and in so desiring not be satisfied with what you already incline to think, there follows one corollary which itself deserves to be inscribed upon every wall of the city of philosophy: Do not block the way of inquiry.†― Charles Sanders Peirce - Philosopher Chappie: Chappie don't eats no food. But nothing wrong with modified foods. Edited June 7, 2016 by Chappie 1 Quote We have seized the means of production. Though union, and self-governance, we have organized between all peoples of the land. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Techcraft2 Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 NSF official: Tests in Nova Scotia contradict the paranoid belief that genetically modified food is unhealthy. It provides the plant further resilience and is able to feed more people. Levels of any negative aliment have not been traced to GMO's and furthermore the NSF looks down upon governments in which so easily throw away scientific progress due to their paranoid beliefs. Conservative belief in the halt of change and the fear of the future is what really impedes the path of inquiry. Stand not in the path of inquiry. “Upon this first, and in one sense this sole, rule of reason, that in order to learn you must desire to learn, and in so desiring not be satisfied with what you already incline to think, there follows one corollary which itself deserves to be inscribed upon every wall of the city of philosophy: Do not block the way of inquiry.†― Charles Sanders Peirce - Philosopher Chappie: Chappie don't eats no food. Nothing wrong with modified foods. Exactly. The impurities of nature must be ironed out by the hands of man. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimitri Valko Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 (edited) NSF official: Tests in Nova Scotia contradict the paranoid belief that genetically modified food is unhealthy. It provides the plant further resilience and is able to feed more people. Levels of any negative aliment have not been traced to GMO's and furthermore the NSF looks down upon governments in which so easily throw away scientific progress due to their paranoid beliefs. Conservative belief in the halt of change and the fear of the future is what really impedes the path of inquiry. Stand not in the path of inquiry. “Upon this first, and in one sense this sole, rule of reason, that in order to learn you must desire to learn, and in so desiring not be satisfied with what you already incline to think, there follows one corollary which itself deserves to be inscribed upon every wall of the city of philosophy: Do not block the way of inquiry.†― Charles Sanders Peirce - Philosopher Chappie: Chappie don't eats no food. But nothing wrong with modified foods. It is unfortunate that the Nova Scotian people would be so quick as to accept such notably harmful foods within their country. Your tests must obviously be incorrect, as our lead researchers in Ryas have found the consumption of GMOs to have ill effects. http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/04/08/10-scientific-studies-proving-gmos-can-be-harmful-to-human-health/ http://responsibletechnology.org/10-reasons-to-avoid-gmos/ http://enhs.umn.edu/current/5103/gm/harmful.html Edited June 7, 2016 by Dimitri Valko 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tali Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 The Quarian people agree with Chappie. We have been genetically modifying our foods before we even came to Orbis to secure food for the fleet and have found no indication of any harmful side effects. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speaker Faris Wheeler Posted June 7, 2016 Author Share Posted June 7, 2016 This thread is going to be the start of WWVII 2 Quote Peace will never be accomplished without war, but war cannot happen without peace.... or something like that idk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chapsie Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 (edited) It is unfortunate that the Nova Scotian people would be so quick as to accept such notably harmful foods within their country. Your tests must obviously be incorrect, as our lead researchers in Ryas have found the consumption of GMOs to have ill effects. http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/04/08/10-scientific-studies-proving-gmos-can-be-harmful-to-human-health/ http://responsibletechnology.org/10-reasons-to-avoid-gmos/ http://enhs.umn.edu/current/5103/gm/harmful.html NOTE: I will be targeting the scientific references, not the article itself, as it provides no real substance. I mean no ill will to you Dimitri, I'd just like to show you. I'm not upset, but rather, intrigued. Maybe I'll learn something myself. On the first link: In your first study, it references this: "Pesticides associated to genetically modified foods (PAGMF), are engineered to tolerate herbicides such as glyphosate (GLYP) and gluphosinate (GLUF) or insecticides such as the bacterial toxin bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between maternal and fetal exposure, and to determine exposure levels of GLYP" GLYP being the herbicide, in which it is the not the genetic that is harmful, but the pesticide. This article referenced in the second point of the first blog you stated talks nothing about GMO's themselves but to DNA that that cannot enter the bloodstream. The third article is just an RT journal post that references an article that later is talked about. So it's basically fluff. The fourth article is not a study at all, but a few interviews of practitioners that are attempting to blame GMO's for their disorders. The expected results and recovery are rather false, as gluten celiac and sensitivities are non repairable with medications and as far as I know, come from birth. This reference may help. The fifth article was withdrawn. "However, very occasionally circumstances may arise where an article is published that must later be retracted or even removed." in which would mean that it was either wrong, or they found something that counteracts (or strengthens) the argument. However one would not withdraw an article without it being wrong, as a correct article would just reference the newer version of said study. But moreover, this proves nothing. What even is this... A redaction of the article does not prove anything, as I said above. This article argues against herbicides... again not GMO's. I will stop referencing these articles, because the more I look, the more that I realize that they are arguing against pesticides, and herbicides and not GMO's. The plants just happen to be herbicide resistant, and in saying that, the plants thus get sprayed with the herbicide, leaving residue. I cannot refute the harmful effects of glyphosate itself, but GMO's are clearly not the problem. Just think, that was only the references in the first article. EDIT: I read the other articles too, they only state potential health risks, and to quote the third link you posted "There is concern that inserting an exotic gene into a plant could cause it to produce toxins at higher levels that could be dangerous to humans. This could happen through the process of inserting the gene into the plant. If other genes in the plant become damaged during the insertion process it could cause the plant to alter its production of toxins." That is similar to saying "If my food is cooked wrong, I will have food poisoning." Edited June 7, 2016 by Chappie 1 Quote We have seized the means of production. Though union, and self-governance, we have organized between all peoples of the land. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speaker Faris Wheeler Posted June 7, 2016 Author Share Posted June 7, 2016 Due to much international concern, The Kingdom has started funding to a team of scientists to start researching and creating a chemical-free healthy pesticide. 1 Quote Peace will never be accomplished without war, but war cannot happen without peace.... or something like that idk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chapsie Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 Due to much international concern, The Kingdom has started funding to a team of scientists to start researching and creating a chemical-free healthy pesticide. This we can agree with, Nova Scotian scientists have also jumped on the international outrage of herb-pesticides and hope that we can create a sort of union to create non-toxic chemicals to help our plants grow and prosper. Quote We have seized the means of production. Though union, and self-governance, we have organized between all peoples of the land. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimitri Valko Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 (edited) -snip- We still do not see good enough reason to genetically modify our food if we do not know the exact side effects of said treatment. It is still an unknown, and we do not wish to risk our citizens' safety with unknowns. As food in Ryas is given freely to civilians, we are always trying to regulate our food to help keep our population healthy, and we are quite simply afraid that these genetic modifications could pose as potential harm to us. Edited June 7, 2016 by Dimitri Valko Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince Hunter of Bavaria Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 The DeustchReich has made its own decision, and based on its own results. Even if the food cost us more, we are willing to pay to give our people the best. The DeustchReich also bans all imports of GMO's and no GMO goods are allowed to travel within our borders. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ekejen Luish Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 We let the people decide what they eat, so all GMO's must be tested by the government frequently and randomly and GMOs must be labeled as GMOs in stores. They are forbidden from being sold at any place other than authorized grocery stores (i.e. not farmer markets or stuff). 2 Quote This is very small Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speaker Faris Wheeler Posted June 7, 2016 Author Share Posted June 7, 2016 This we can agree with, Nova Scotian scientists have also jumped on the international outrage of herb-pesticides and hope that we can create a sort of union to create non-toxic chemicals to help our plants grow and prosper. Thanks. Hyrule has much to thank for your efforts. 1 Quote Peace will never be accomplished without war, but war cannot happen without peace.... or something like that idk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Techcraft2 Posted June 7, 2016 Share Posted June 7, 2016 We are surprised at the lack of embrace of the future. In the Order of Humanity, our GMO crops will taste and grow better than any organic crop. Our food scientists labor endlessly pursuing a greater and better food for the nation. We hope that one day, meats as well could be "grown" economically in the same manner as our vegetables and fruits. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ekejen Luish Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 We in Meonesia use farm skyscrapers; Crops, though not animals, are grown on each level of the building using growlights and sprinklers and all. Of course, we also use regular farms. But these farms are able to grow lots of crops in a small space, and clean the air (we leave the windows open when it's not raining and turn off air conditioning when we can in these places). 1 Quote This is very small Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.