Namukara

Yeah, obviously no nukes because that wouldn't test anything and would just be idiotic on either side, but a few test wars between willing participants could be useful, not on the artificial environment of the test server. Everyone participating could put some money in a pot so we're playing for to win something.

If CotL would oblige with a lack of counters, I'm sure we could throw nations at you and see what city count it takes to defeat you 1v1, if that's something you'd be interested in.

Can we have a compremise on downvotes? As in, only have them for terrible updates like this?

Absolutely. Something we should steal from NationStates is the ability to give different officers different permissions.

The rule is that if people make a goodbye thread, they'll come back, if they just vanish we'll never see them again.

Spy slot filling is kind of meh, it's not really something to get too upset about. Both sides in the last global were doing far worse.

well done on banning one of the most active players in the game, you're getting good at this Alex. I wish you'd stick with banning bad people like the NPO though, rather than decent people.

I would back SoA in a SoA-Pantheon cage match, largely because pantheon leadership has never given me the impression that they know what they're doing.

Why is one of your vps in 20 city war range with 13 cities? Do you want to get raided?

Good evening, The factcheck department has noticed some errors that require clarification in the above statement and has sent me to make such known. Firstly, the lost empire never backed out of a war with goons, they were with us until the end despite having no direct reason to enter in the first place. I suspect that this commitment is the reason that they have found both finding and keeping friends to be easy. Secondly, although the regiment did withdraw from the war, they did so much later than other combatants, and following what I understand to be a lot of internal arguments. The regiments warchest was not at the state that would be required for a prolonged war, and like the lost empire they were not chained into entering it. Most were happy that they saw fit to enter in the first place. In the end I must conclude that one group of great people has found another, to form a stronger alliance, and I wish them luck in their future endeavours.

I know of a guy with some pretty impressive resource stockpiles who hasn't been active since march if any whales want a nice boost. In a pretty useless alliance as well so you might get some bank.

Start that global already, nobody knows what you're waiting for

I would really like to know if schrutesphere would try to white peace with a single person.

You're in range of some people who really cannot fight who could still destroy some infra.

Or you could continue attacking whales, let them lower your infra for you and then become the worlds scariest raider.

At speaking my mind? Every alliance I'm in thinks I'm way too good at it. Apparently it tends to put them in a bad light

So he didn't benefit from it, yet he should be attacked...because he didn't follow the exact letter of the law? When do you plan on reforming goons? He made some rl money, big deal. We're all broke rn, I'm sure the rl money served him well.

I just want to know what the conversation between Kim and TEst leadership was when they came up with this marvellous plan...unless of course it was TEst leadership who proposed it.

Could you please show me the proof you obviously have that EM gained an ingame benefit from this? If you can, I'll gladly stop arguing what I'm arguing, I'm not too proud to admit I'm wrong if I am. Right now though, I'm seing a dogpile and I'm not a fan of those.

What is this, an alliance announcement in alliance affairs? Congrats Adrienne!

So...EM was being a middle man for some ingame cash for rl cash thing, in which, if anything, he was providing the ingame cash. Unless perhaps you don't think that money should exist, I'm struggling to understand where your anger towards him rather than Nokia or George comes from, because he didn't profit from the transaction ingame. What unfair benefit are you arguing he received?

Cypher, weren't you that guy who we all had to disassociate ourselves from in the last global when you were gloating about BK getting hacked? That's right isn't it, and now you're trying to take the moral high ground.

Similar happened when for some reason somebody decided to make a nation with the same name as one of the banned NPO people.

I only give to good causes, sorry.

You can fire off a maximum of 4 nukes per war. Your nuclear attacks are doing just under 2k damage; his navals are doing 1.3. You're also slotted. It'll likely cost him more to rebuild than you because 4k infra, but he has more money than you. Whatever way you look at this, you lose.