Stanislaw Sikorski

Poland of science advance! Poland can into space! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miros%C5%82aw_Hermaszewski

Thanks everyone, you’ve been a great community and I will still recommend people to play this game. One day I may return (although you might all forget me by that time, it’ll be a while.)

I keep losing too much from getting raided so all my trade offers keep getting cancelled. I would've given it all to VoC if I could.

Polska has space program. Head of State Stanisław Sikorski ends his alliance with VoC during its time of war, whether he should've stayed until the end to avoid such a dishonourable act is a debated topic for his people. Either way, he leaves his position and shuts down the government like he would've done if he stayed until the end of the war so the fate of Polska would've been inevitable either way. A farewell is given to VoC along with all the resources owned at the time. IV Rzeczpospolita Polska is left to be raided by all other nations and alliances. Sikorski sold as much infrastructure and land as he could and left the money to the remaining citizens of Polska before leaving with as much of the population as possible. Sikorski now keeps to himself in his office with a select few people, hardly showing himself in public or on media. For future citizens of Polska on Orbis, they will most likely forget Sikorski's past efforts and name, just as he will forget about them. The future is somewhere else for Sikorski. What will become of Sikorski's future? His influence on Orbis gone, all we know is that we won't be seeing him again. (I'll still be here for a while to read any interesting replies people have. OK now the real reason I'm leaving is because I now have CIV 5 and I just don't have the time to be active and fighting effectively in wars. There's nothing wrong with this game, it's a good concept and I enjoyed my time here. Most of you probably don't know me but I used to be more active here and I was the MoFA for VoC. Goodbye Orbis. Good luck to you all.)

March of War, still downloading CIV 5 at the time of posting. F2P game but still good.

Different alliances give their members different titles so I don't think anyone can answer that unless they're from the alliance you're talking about.

I actually wanted to make two nations to experiment with gameplay but I suppose there is the risk of slippery slope if one person is allowed.

Could have either a slightly less or same damage as nuclear weapons.

Welcome! You placed an embargo on New India, nice one xD.

Welcome! I advise you join an alliance to help your nation grow faster and to have better security. Also, only buy infrastructure in batches of 100 so you can buy the maximum amount for the minimum price per unit, rather than having the price rise after buying only 50.

Welcome! I advise you carry on checking these forums as people post some interesting suggestions on how to improve the game and you may find help from some of the users who've been here longer. Help out other new players in the community on these forums by answering their questions, you'll be rewarded for it.

I'm from Britain.

Happy bonfire night everyone! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Fawkes_Night

I believe what we're trying to achieve is realism. With war, not everyone would be unhappy about war. As for tax rate and average income, that would just make people change their policies to have the highest average income and lowest tax rate, it wouldn't change their revenue but it would increase their citizen happiness which destroys the idea behind the policies being used as a RP element of the game.

I thought about doing that to experiment with raiding, too bad you're not allowed to have more than one nation.

Being a teenager in Britain, the word is used a lot so I really don't care much when people use it. I try to use curse words and insults to express myself or as a joke as opposed to trying to be offensive, although nobody actually takes anything offensive seriously (mostly because people are obviously joking and it has become funny to be offensive as a joke even if there's no clever thought behind it) and the word banter now describes anything said or done that's offensive/harmful.

It should be based on who has won the most wars between nations instead. If a nation suffered huge losses that would have too much of an effect on deciding the winner for just one nation losing a war with heavy losses.

I'm just happy that the war is over, I didn't lose any of my wars and that I managed to rebuild. I was most concerned about the damage my nation would suffer as a result of war mostly.

War was costing me a lot since I was targeted by airstrikes and couldn't defend myself against them. I'm glad that peace is finally achieved and hope that all other smaller nations can still rebuild after this war, no matter how large the cost.

You should really only buy land in batches of 500 so you can buy the maximum amount of land for the minimum price, rather than paying more per unit for every 100 or however much you're buying at the moment. Same goes for infra if you're not buying it in batches of 100 already. Do this, you'll be able to get land at a cheaper price and reduce your disease rate.

A suggestion to include perks in the game was made a while ago. It's a nice idea but then it might make people spend more on their military, if we had to add methods of improving military we would need methods of improving other things so I prefer the perk idea.

You should get used to it, I've had it for a while and it doesn't bother me anymore now.

Did you skip the tutorial? Really bad idea, you could use the bonus money and you would've known how to play this game.

A nice idea that would give spies a very good use and stop wars from going on too long.

War would cost a lot to all nations and the damage to our nations isn't worth the looting of resources for some of us. Seeing as we're still in the early stages of the game I don't think war may start although people should still be prepared.