Wendell Williams

.

Offense: !@#$ buzzwords Nation Link: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=250840 !@#$ and anything closely related is against game rules.

Offense: !@#$ themed Nation Link:https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=273121 !@#$ and anything closely related is against game rules.

Offense: !@#$ themed Nation Link:https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=273455 !@#$ and anything closely related is against game rules.

Offense: racist themed not sure if it's intentionally mispelled. Nation Link: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=335676 Racism and anything closely related is against game rules.

Offense: !@#$ themed Nation Link: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=327740 !@#$ and anything closely related is against game rules.

Offense: !@#$ themed Nation Link: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=329536 !@#$ and anything closely related is against game rules.

"AllIAnce tEiriNg bAsED oN raNdomNess" Do people even know how to lie well enough these days?

Guns and Roses or Global War 18 Several wars in the past had 1 or 2 names. I like the ring of the name.

Designer: And what do you want gradients on? The Legion: yes!!!

Story has no context. What Queen are you fighting for? She just appears like a stray Kim Kardashian ? Maybe someone never told you that these things you write are cringe.

Yeah it's a question on everyones mind. I think we can agree at least it's on the list. 😛

Does Roasis even know what's going on? Nobody seems to have signed a thing? Is this a troll post? Sounds like you just want there to be peace really bad. I mean until Roasis founds out about this forum post have a great afternoon, see you bright and early on Monday.

Give it a rest will you.

Sorry man I had to remove it, I didn't know so many people will react in such an adverse way. These are serious times you know.

I wish you'll stop strawmanning. I simply chose this because Adrienne somewhat rhymes with pants. If it was cringe/trashy then that's the point. However, your level of reach is making me wonder if you dislocated your shoulder.

Getting rolled implies permanently losing. I don't get rolled,especially not by fishy weebs.

I wouldn't think a member of TzkR finding this funny. But when you are a member of the biggest hack ever:

What makes you think either alliance are Pirates?

They are just doing a disservice to their constituents. We want what remains of quack eradicated and not allowed to continue. Roasis appears to be letting quack get by with all types of stuff. Very poor performance Roasis leaders!

I'm not sure what you are refuting. I think I was agreeing that having a force 2.5 time greater should always result in an IT. I was saying it should then work in reverse. This wasn't the case though with it being a toss-up on who wins or loses instead of it being based on actual might.

What the hell are you talking about?? I have to do what he describes as well. I had 87 ships opponent has almost half as many. Still a moderate success. This happens alot with naval. Like I said in the other post this doesn't happen in reverse at all.

The silly thing about this is it doesn't work in reverse. Try attacking a force 2.5 times larger and it's an UTTER FAILURE every damn time. I want Alex to explain how he figured that was fair and what math he was using. Because that it isn't looking right to me. @Alex

What's a genareal?

The selling out of Hedge is where I miss the joke punchline or troll attempt. Then to turn around and complain about being dog piled when all they do is enter wars after an alliance has been slotted, including joining the side they think will win; Quack in this instance, is just a bad look. I understand they can do what they want but volunteering to be a little sister to Quack and being total parrots of their deceptive propaganda (not even trying to sound any different as well) isn't "based".