Jump to content

MonkeyDLegend

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    424

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by MonkeyDLegend

    1116 Days

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    3 hours ago, Buck Turgidson said:

    Well I was in the alliance he was in, where he shared updates every time he thought it was about to be implemented. People routinely asked him for updates. I will look for them tonight or tomorrow - for now, I am preparing for a television interview (not kidding) for a product I designed that was not doing to well until the current C19 crisis. Now it is flying off the shelves! Anyone from Montreal can tune into CTV - they will likely air it as a feel-good piece on the 6pm news. So if you want to know what I look like, look for the guy with the green screen...

    ? 
    I was thinking about the space program, spysat and moon landing, not sure about the new projects, only seen one post about it. No knowledge about the dates.

    AYY LMAO DOW

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted · Edited by MonkeyDLegend

    5 hours ago, namukara said:

    So...EM was being a middle man for some ingame cash for rl cash thing, in which, if anything, he was providing the ingame cash.

    Unless perhaps you don't think that money should exist, I'm struggling to understand where your anger towards him rather than Nokia or George comes from, because he didn't profit from the transaction ingame. What unfair benefit are you arguing he received?

    NR and george both got their nations reset or did it them self. 
    "The punishment for real-world transactions for in-game materials will be a complete nation reset upon first offense, and a permanent ban from Politics & War upon a second offense."

    2 hours ago, namukara said:

    Could you please show me the proof you obviously have that EM gained an ingame benefit from this? If you can, I'll gladly stop arguing what I'm arguing, I'm not too proud to admit I'm wrong if I am. Right now though, I'm seing a dogpile and I'm not a fan of those.

    You don't need to have a ingame or irl gain to be guilty, you just need to part-take/be a middle-man/know about it without reporting it to Admin.
     

    As it says on the rules page before the rules: The rules for game-play are relatively simple and easy to follow. Be smart, use common sense, and you won't have any issues.
    Taking part knowingly in illicit activities withour reporting it is against the rules, so is knowing that someone is cheating and not reporting it.(common sense)

    • Upvote 4

    AYY LMAO DOW

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    3 hours ago, namukara said:

    Cypher, weren't you that guy who we all had to disassociate ourselves from in the last global when you were gloating about BK getting hacked? That's right isn't it, and now you're trying to take the moral high ground.

     

    1 hour ago, Cypher said:

    I’ve never hidden the fact that I believe everything in war is fair game. There are people who don’t share the same opinion as me, and that’s absolutely fine. 
     

    What isn’t fine is getting caught cheating and profiting, attempting to swindle more IG cash and immunity of Alex and offer nothing in addition. That isn’t an opinion, that is me being as objectively true to the facts.

    @namukara are you one of those people who share their log in details ? bc if ur not then shut the frick up about the BK-hacking sacndal. 
    Digging shit up from the past won't help, esp when ur 200% wrong and Cypher was right back then.
    There is no moral-high-ground here, BK got what they deserved back then bc they shared accounts, either get ur information correct or just don't comment.

    1116 Days

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted

    19 hours ago, Buck Turgidson said:

    It is a fair point, and I am sure there are some gray areas. How d you feel about folks who are effectively granted Diplomatic immunity like @Prefontaine? If you see the screens I posted, and the brazen confidence in how he posted them, you can see a cheater who knows he will not be punished if caught.

    Ironically, he just named his latest city 'Integrity' - a pantomime of a liar on display.

    Frankly, that is far more damaging to the credibility of the game that someone who has been caught and forgiven like @Elijah Mikaelson

    I wouldn't call it cheating, but it does fall into a gray area. Pre has had some good ideas on how to make the projects do what they were intended for, which was to dry up raws and refined resources.
    I do not agree with some of them and I have given my honest opinion to both Pre and Alex. As for the projects and it being "secret information shared for big gains", that is not true, @Prefontaine has made many posts about the projects and shared those forums-posts often, so has Alex also and even made them available in test-server for us to test them and report potential bugs.
    It might maybe appear that he has used that secret information at first glance, but I highly doubt that. If you dig through the forums a bit you can see that that's not the case and that Pre has made several posts, also dig through the public discord it's the same there. 

    • Popular Post
    • Popular Post

    Did the miners all leave?

    in Orbis Central

    Posted

    12 hours ago, Roberts said:

    Back at it again with some economic interests.

    So Alex posted his enforcement of game rules on February 5th. This resulted in a mass exodus of GPWC, NPO, GOONS, and other alliances from PnW.

    By the end of February we began seeing a downward slope for raw resources.

     

    • Coal: Almost 50% of the world supply gone
    • Bauxite: Almost 50% of the world supply gone
    • Food production stagnated since March
    • Iron almost 50% used up
    • Lead almost 3/4th of the supply vanished 
    • Cash hasnt recovered to pre-Feb 5th levels yet
    • Oil : almost 50% gone
    • Uranium supply is down 25%

    Basically tl;dr - It appears the market suppliers have all gone home. Aluminum appears to be the only resource being crafted at a reasonable rate, all the others are very slowly recovering.

    Our market is looking like it might be fooked for a long time in our post-apocalypse world.

     

    Pay ur own student loan.

    9 hours ago, Epi said:

    Bruh, folks are hoarding stuff again to keep the market prices high. 

    8Dt9FWw.jpg

    • Haha 11

    1116 Days

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted · Edited by MonkeyDLegend

    On 4/20/2020 at 6:01 PM, Elijah Mikaelson said:

    (Also cheater? i broke the rules but did i cheat? I do not think so)

    Getting immunity from being banned surely means that ur squeaky cleen and didn't break the rules, you are beyond reproach; without vice.
    Jokes aside, so on a srs note; shut the frick up, bc you broke the rules, was going to get banned and that means you cheated.
    Having immunity doesn't change the facts.
     

    @Buck Turgidson sorry for taking the thread off-topic, please continue the retirement home drama :P

    • Upvote 2

    1116 Days

    in Alliance Affairs

    Posted · Edited by MonkeyDLegend

    On 4/19/2020 at 10:38 PM, Buck Turgidson said:

    ~snip~

     

     

     

     

    On 4/19/2020 at 10:48 PM, Prefontaine said:

    ~snip~

     

    Glad to see it's taken outside of the retirement home. :P

    On 4/19/2020 at 11:22 PM, Hime-sama said:

    Can we get a tldr?

    HmA4oNH.gif

    • Haha 1

    Satellite Projects revisited.

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted · Edited by MonkeyDLegend

    3 minutes ago, Elijah Mikaelson said:

    but with that, would their become a point where its not worth buying any more cities as you wont make anything? most cities now only add anywhere from 400k to 750k a day to your income.

    Not really, once you go above c40(if we do 0.25% decrease) or c50(if the decrease is 0.20%) then you'll have 115% commerce still. 

    It just makes the project worthless above the project-city limit, which would make it worth to buy it in early game-play. 

    Satellite Projects revisited.

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Elijah Mikaelson said:

    2% is huge as well, for how cheap it is

    it's cheap bc we have it stockpiled, a city 20 nation would have to save up for a while and will be slowed down in terms of city growth. 

    Could make it so 1st city is maxed 125% commerce, then i gradually decreases, like 0.20-0.25%commerce, all the way down to 115%.  that way when you reach c40/50 the project is useless.

    Satellite Projects revisited.

    in Game Suggestions

    Posted

    Telecommunications Satellite:
    Requirements: Space Program,  International Trade Center
    Cost:
    Cash: $40,000,000
    Bauxite: 20,000
    Uranium: 20,000
    Oil: 20,000
    Munitions: 10,000
    Steel: 10,000
    Aluminum: 10,000
    Iron: 1,000
    Lead: 1,000

    Effect: Increases the commerce rate in each city by 2%. Increases the maximum commerce rates in cities to 125%. Reduces city improvement upkeep by 10%. Reduces resource production upkeep by 10%
    ___________________________________


    This seems a bit too OP, this will just inflate the prices more and the whales will make even more cash. Which again will lead to higher resource prices. 
    I find it a good idea but it's hurting the low tier and slowing them down.

    Might add; we saw what happened when CP and ACP got implemented.

    Selling art drawn by me

    in Free Trade Market

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, Alex said:

    It depends on the context. The question we should be asking is: Is the artwork game related?

    I'd consider custom flags for use in-game, on the forum, discord, etc. to be "in-game goods" or at least "game related goods" which would not be against the rules to trade for in-game money.

    If you were, say, a painter and someone commissioned you a picture of a horse that had nothing to do with the game and was going to be hung up in your house or something, but wanted to pay in in-game money, that would be against the rules.

    It's a gray area with some nuance, but hopefully that makes it clear what is and isn't against the rules.

    Thanks for clarifying! :D 

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.

  I accept